Your driver's license back.
All right, like I said, I visually
estimated you at 65 in a 45.
>> estimated me?
>> Yeah, when I was going westbound or
eastbound, you were going westbound. You
flew past me.
>> And you didn't clock me with any sort of
radar or any sort of equipment?
>> visual, but you were definitely going
too fast.
>> time that your eyes have been
calibrated?
>> It doesn't matter about my eyes. I've
been trained.
>> You've been trained?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay.
>> To visually estimate.
>> to go to court with this.
>> That's fine. Fight it. So, I'm citing
you for speeding 20 plus in a 45. Okay,
and reckless driving because there was
other cars that you're driving past,
weaving in and around traffic and
>> Weaving in and around the traffic, okay.
>> An Arapahoe County Sheriff's Deputy
pulls over a motorist after claiming he
had to drive over 100 mph to catch up to
the vehicle.
The driver calmly hands over his
license, registration, and insurance
while asserting his right to remain
silent.
The officer admits he did not use radar
and instead relied entirely on a visual
estimate to clock the vehicle's speed at
65 mph in a 45 mph zone.
This reliance on subjective guesswork by
law enforcement highlights systemic
overreach and potential corruption
within traffic enforcement.
>> I'll be right back.
>> Okay.
>> Yeah, 43.
>> Good evening. I'm Deputy Hockley with
Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office. The
reason I was pulling you over is you
were going a little fast down there on
Arapahoe Road. It's 45 and you're going
way fast.
>> Okay.
>> Do you know how fast you were going?
>> Uh I don't answer questions.
>> You don't answer questions?
>> No. Here's my uh registration, license,
and I'm pulling up my insurance right
now for
>> Okay, perfect.
>> One second here.
Well, I had to do a 100 and 3 to catch
up to you from Piccadilly and all the
way to Buckley's before I caught up to
you.
>> Did you clock me on radar or
>> No.
>> Oh, so you didn't clock me?
>> No.
>> You just caught up to me.
>> Mhm.
>> Okay, I understand.
>> Visually, I estimated your speed around
like
65.
>> That's interesting.
>> Okay.
>> It's not my car.
>> It's not your car. Can you pull that up
again?
>> Yep.
>> It was uh
>> I don't answer questions.
>> Okay.
>> Is that valid insurance good?
>> Uh can can you pull it up again?
>> When questioned about his methods, the
deputy dismisses the need for radar
calibration and writes citations for
speeding and reckless driving.
The driver firmly challenges these
arbitrary charges, noting that the
officer's unverified visual estimation
lacks empirical backing.
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens
from unreasonable searches and seizures,
requiring probable cause based on
objective evidence rather than arbitrary
suspicion.
Such questionable enforcement tactics
demonstrate how corrupt practices can
manifest through abuse of administrative
authority on public roadways.
>> All right, I'll be right back.
>> This guy doesn't answer questions.
>> At all?
>> That's what he says.
I asked him if he knew how fast he was
going cuz I had to
do over 100 to catch up to him.
And he says, "I don't answer questions."
>> Hm.
Well, that's nice.
>> Mhm.
And then he's driving a car that's not
his.
And I asked him who this person is, and
he says, "I don't answer questions."
>> Hm.
This could get interesting.
>> [snorts]
>> What's that dude?
>> All I was doing was uh
flying past. Uh I was heading eastbound,
he was heading westbound.
Flipped around, and
I was almost to uh
Liverpool.
Like Piccadilly area.
>> [snorts]
>> Um
>> [clears throat]
>> So, I turn around, try to catch up to
him doing I'm like doing like 106
trying to catch up to him. I don't catch
up to him until like Buckley, and he's
like weaving around traffic and [ __ ]
>> Oh [ __ ] [snorts]
>> So, I'm going to get him for speeding
and reckless.
He doesn't answer questions, by the way.
He doesn't answer questions.
He's driving somebody else's car, but he
won't tell me
who that person is.
They're recording on their cell phones
right now.
>> Huh?
>> They're recording on their cell phones
right now.
So, you know.
>> [snorts]
>> Which one am I driving?
>> Huh?
>> Which one's recording?
>> The one in the passenger seat.
All right.
>> The tension escalates after the citation
is issued when the driver requests the
deputy's professional business card for
his legal counsel. Instead of complying
professionally, the officer becomes
defensive and hostile, even momentarily
drawing his firearm while open carrying
near the vehicle.
Under the color of law, police officers
are prohibited from using excessive
force or intimidation tactics to
retaliate against citizens for
exercising their legal rights.
This aggressive display exposes an
alarming misuse of power and a disregard
for public accountability.
>> Who's Dr. Sebeck?
>> Yeah.
>> All right. Like I said, I had visually
estimated you at 65 in a 45.
>> estimated me?
>> Yeah, when I was going westbound or
eastbound, you were going westbound, you
flew past me.
>> And you didn't clock me with any sort of
radar or any sort of equipment.
>> visual, but you were definitely going
too fast.
>> time that your eyes have been
calibrated?
>> It doesn't matter about my eyes. I've
been trained
>> You've been trained?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay.
>> to visually estimate.
>> to go to court for this.
>> That's fine.
>> it. So, I'm citing you for speeding 20
plus in a 45.
>> Okay.
>> Okay, and reckless driving because there
was other cars that you were driving
past, weaving in and around traffic and
>> Weaving in and around in traffic, okay.
>> Yeah.
>> That's fine. That records my speed.
>> So you should have seen that that other
car that you cut off right before you
went to the light when I finally caught
up to you.
>> I didn't cut them off. I had plenty of
space.
>> Okay, that's fine. Either way,
your court date is going to be Monday,
October 7th, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. I will be
there.
Arapahoe County Combined Court is down
there. There's the address right there.
All right, I just need a signature from
you right here saying that you'll show
up to court.
>> Not an admission of guilt?
>> Nope.
>> No problem.
Right here?
>> Yep.
>> There's my signature autograph. There
you go.
>> Here's your citation.
>> No problem.
>> Drive safe.
>> card?
>> It My name's on there.
>> I can't get your business card.
Can I get yours, sir?
>> Drive safe.
>> Can I get your business card?
>> All my information is on my
>> I I want your business card. It's
professional for you to just give me
your business card.
Is that too much to ask for?
The stop's over, so can I just get your
business card? That's all I want.
>> Why are you getting out of your vehicle
right now?
>> Huh?
I didn't hear what you said.
>> You need to step back in your vehicle.
>> The traffic stop's over.
>> Correct.
>> I get your business card?
>> And you're over here with a firearm
flashing right at me.
>> It's I'm open
It's open carry legal.
>> It's not.
>> Get back in your car.
>> Or else what?
>> Have a good day.
>> I need your business card.
>> My information is on the citation that I
gave you.
>> Because I'm going to request all this
uh the video evidence from your body
cams and I want to forward request all
this information.
>> Okay, you can get all that.
>> I want your business card.
>> All right, there you go.
>> I appreciate it. Thank you.
>> Have a nice day.
>> I appreciate it.
That's That's all you had to do. Can I
get yours?
>> Lit- literally all of his badge number
>> No, I understand that, but I like the
business card just so I can give it to
my lawyer. It's not the first time I've
been through this. Don't be scared of
firearms, bro. It's the second
Amendment.
>> afraid of firearms.
>> I I see your memorial band.
>> Yeah.
>> Were you Marine Corps or
>> Marine Corps.
>> Thank you for your service. That's all
you had to do.
>> Okay, have a good day. Drive safe.
>> Traffic stop's over. I'm free to go,
right?
>> Go. Yeah, go.
>> [snorts]
>> Charlie 71, clear traffic.
>> 10-1 emergency for 5 minutes.
>> They're combat.
>> Ultimately, the motorist stands his
ground, addresses the officer's previous
military service, and successfully
obtains the necessary contact details
for accountability.
The encounter concludes with the driver
being found not guilty in court,
exposing the baseless nature of the
initial stop.
Due process of law guarantees every
individual the right to a fair and
impartial hearing to contest unlawful
government actions.
Such cases serve as a vital reminder of
why oversight is essential to curb
unchecked law enforcement misconduct.
Like and subscribe for more videos like
this. Thanks.