This was pointed out by Dominic Isizo
and I missed it and I think a whole lot
of other people missed it. But Will
McNeel was held at gunpoint. He wasn't
just brutalized and punched in the face.
Sucker punched in the face. He wasn't
just punched seven or eight times. He
was held at gunpoint and his life hung
in the balance. Why did he rob a bank?
Did he shoot up a school? Nope. Didn't
have his headlights on when the cop
thought he should have. And this is what
you can expect in the land of the free,
home of the brave. In America, violating
corporate traffic law could cost you
your life. I don't know about you, but I
love the fact that Brandon Tatum, former
Tucson police officer/SWAT
team member Brandon Tatum, keeps talking
about the Will McNeel case because the
more that he talks, the deeper and
deeper he digs his grave. We're going to
talk about him real quick and this
attorney that gets a hat tip from
Brandon Tatum. But before we go over
this, let me ask you a question and I
want you to be very honest with me about
it. If somehow immorality, criminality,
and evil were all legalized,
would you support it? As long as it's
legal, would it get your support? What
if the legalization of immorality,
criminality, and evil was packaged as
necessary and beneficial for the safety
of the people? Would you support it
then? And now let me ask you, what is
the supreme law of the land here in
America? And do you have the support and
the protection of that supreme law of
the land during a traffic stop? Or does
the traffic stop supersede the rights
that you thought you had under the
Constitution? I'm going to revisit these
questions after we watch what Brandon
Tatum says now about the Will McNeel
stop. That day I just really wanted to
know um you know why I was getting
pulled over.
>> Is there a reason that you're pulling me
over?
>> Yeah, absolutely. There's a reason why
I'm pulling over. For one thing,
inclement inclement weather, you don't
have your lights on. Two things. You're
not wearing your seatelt.
>> It's daylight. I don't need the lights.
And it's not weather. It's not raining.
>> It's not raining.
>> Okay. I'm not arguing with you. I'm
telling you why I'm pulling you over.
Give me your driver's license
registration.
>> Driving on suspended driver license is
wrong. A disobedient lawful command is
wrong. Driving on suspended driver's
license is wrong
as opposed to being right as opposed to
the bill of rights and unalienable
rights. Driving with a suspended license
is viewed by Brandon Tatum as wrong, as
illegal, as something worthy of not only
stopping somebody, but punching somebody
in the face. Just keep that in mind. The
son got arrested, was found guilty.
What? What are we even talking about at
this point? It's a money grab.
What's going on, ladies and gentlemen?
Make sure you like and subscribe to the
channel. Hit the bell. Crazy stuff. And
something Let's But what is going on in
the world? Again, I find myself still
talking about this guy that got uh
slapped in the face in the car on a
traffic stop. I want to let it go, but I
can't let it go. People are making
videos about me. And I have to say
there's this fake lawyer, and I say a
fake lawyer because he probably is a
legitimate licensed person to practice
law. But some lawyers, just because you
have the title lawyer, don't mean you're
a good lawyer. Don't mean you're a
reasonable lawyer, and don't mean you
know what you're talking about. Same
thing with police officers, just because
you're a cop, but just because you was a
cop don't always automatically mean you
know what you're talking about. You have
to you have to point things out um fair
and impartial and therefore people will
respect and support what you're saying.
And this attorney that made a video
about me is wrong.
>> So this guy right here, he calls a fake
lawyer. the lead attorney, Brandon
Tatum, is calling a fake lawyer because
this fake lawyer doesn't agree with
Brandon Tatum. Even though this fake
lawyer in the video that he's referring
to only went over statute, Florida
statute 316 217, which states that
during any rain, smoke, or fog, that is
the grounds for a legitimate traffic
stop according to their own laws. in the
comment section, I expose that he's
wrong. And then I have another attorney
that in my opinion is practicing law
like he's supposed to, he is correct.
>> Okay. So, this guy right here who he
says is correct. I'm going to play a
snippet of the attorney that Brandon
Tatum approves of. By the way, I noticed
later in the video that this Kia that
Arthur McNeel is driving is pretty beat
up. It's got a lot of dents. It looks
like it has substantial front end
damage. The the hood is kind of buckled
in.
Uh, it's hard to tell, but I think that
was present before this stop. I don't
think the the police vehicles involved
caused that damage, for example,
which might have been another reason
that the officer did the traffic stop.
Was this vehicle?
What
he's admitting, see, he knows and
everybody knows that there are
stereotypical traffic stops. There are
things that cops look for in order to
make that stop. You know, some people
say, "Hey, cuz it's drive, he was
driving while black." Some people say,
"No, people who look like they're, you
know, impoverished, who can't fix their
vehicle, they get targeted by cops
because other people who have money,
they can typically fight back and fight
the ticket
>> just involved in an act."
>> But wait, there's more.
>> They don't say that. Uh they say because
it was he didn't have his headlights on
in the rain. kind of implying they don't
say that, but this could be the reason
for the stop, which means that the cop
actually lied if what he's saying is
true. If the implication is properly
placed on this law enforcement officer
who initiated the traffic stop because
we do know that cops lie. They'll lie
about, "Hey, you weren't wearing your
seat belt when you actually were." We've
seen evidence of that. They'll say,
"Your license plate wasn't properly
illuminated." We find out later that it
was, hey, your brake light, your third
brake light was out when it really
wasn't. So, they look up look, they
they're just drumming up ways to hem you
up. And it goes even beyond their own
traffic code. They just lie about you.
609 cases in Nashville, Tennessee, shows
that cops have actually charged people
with the DUI that were perfectly sober.
So, don't tell me cops don't have a
history and a pattern of pulling people
over predicated on a bald-faced lie. My
first driver's license ever in my life
was a Florida driver's license. Uh, by
the way, and one of the things they
taught us, this is not a rule in every
state, but in Florida, if there's rain,
if your wipers are on, your headlights
have to be on. In fact, your headlights
have to be on uh if there's just
inclement weather that may reduce
visibility,
>> which is crazy that a lawyer would
actually say that in light of 316 217,
which doesn't say anything about
inclement weather. And we've gone over
this in a video before, so I'm not going
to beat a dead horse. But this right
here is the lawyer that Brandon Tatum
approves of because the lawyer is
actually feeding into Brandon Tatum's
narrative of you better obey the law
enforcement officer or this is going to
happen to you and it's perfectly just
that it does happen to you for a
headlight violation
>> and go watch his video. Watch the guy
who lied who who was, you know, I think
is deceived and watch the guy who told
the truth. Make up your mind. But uh
let's talk about this this video that
has gone out and now McNeel Jr. who's
hired the most corrupt attorney in my
opinion who's a ambulance chaser in the
history of the country. All he do is
chase civil rights uh claims just to get
people paid out. I wonder will he ever
disclose how much money he make on these
civil rights claims. And he only do it
with black people and and and not one
person that he uh uh support or promotes
was following the law. 99% of all the
people that Benjamin Trump has
supported, the officer has always been
acquitted. almost
>> he claims that Benjamin Crump, and I
agree, is an ambulance chaser. Brandon
Tatum claims that Benjamin Crump is a
criminal, that he's corrupt, that he's
on the take, that he's basically a
grifter, a con artist lawyer who's not
interested in any kind of justice. He's
interested in just cashing in. But
Brandon Tatum says in this video, and
it's worth repeating, this video that I
did, I just did this video short uh a
year or two ago, where Brandon Tatum
condemns Benjamin Crump for being
corrupt, but says we need a Benjamin
Crumpt type person to defend law
enforcement agents. Brandon Tatum
unwittingly admits that he wants a
criminal corrupt defense attorney
defending police. Police officers need a
Benjamin Crump for police officers.
>> Think about, let this sink in. Brandon
Tatum, former Tucson SWAT team member,
police officer Brandon Tatum says police
officers need a corrupt criminal con
artist Benjamin Crump to defend police
officers.
>> That that when police officers get into
something like this, they can have a
voice. But what kind of person does
Brandon Tatum think Benjamin Trump is?
>> And of course, the criminal, I can't
stand him. I'm trying to find an
adjective to describe him.
>> He's calling Benjamin Crump a criminal.
We need We need a criminal to defend the
criminals in law enforcement.
>> Benjamin Crump, who's an ambulance
chaser. He's only involved with cases if
they're going to make him money. If your
son get killed today unjustifiably by
anybody other than the police officer,
Benjamin Crump will not show up to
support you. You know, Benjamin Crump is
is is is one of the crookedest lawyers
in my personal opinion, only taking
cases where he's going to make a
lucrative paycheck on.
>> So, according to Brandon Tatum, Benjamin
Crump is crooked, criminal, corrupt, and
money grubbing. But that's the kind of
defense attorney that police need to
defend them in court. Says pretty much
everything you need to know about the
mentality of law enforcement today. And
it truly does because that is the
mentality of an ex- law enforcement
officer who still has the same mentality
as though he were still a law
enforcement officer. But he ain't done
yet.
>> Every case that officer been acquitted.
All he's doing is getting money. He's
not getting justice because he know that
the person who he's representing was a
complete fraud and did everything he
wasn't supposed to do. But he want to
get the civil rights claim to make
money. Okay.
>> It is true. There there is no justice to
be gotten when there is a settlement
because we still have traffic law which
supersedes the Constitution of the
United States on every single traffic
stop in this country.
>> Let's watch this press conference
together. And who in their right mind
think that the press conference or the
statements in the press conference from
McNeel Jr. and his dad or even Benjamin
CR make any sense whatsoever? Comment in
the comment section. These people are
living in another world. Wrote a clip.
that day. I just really wanted to know
um you know why I was getting pulled
over and why uh I needed to step out the
car and I know I didn't do nothing
wrong. Um
>> I was really just scared.
>> Hold on. What What do you mean you just
wanted to know why you were pulled over?
He told you why you were pulled over. He
told you. You just didn't want to accept
it. All right, let's let's keep
watching. to see that video made me go
back to the moment when I was 22. It
hurt it. It made me upset.
>> Mhm.
>> But I seen what my
>> By the way, I I don't believe any of
these people either. And I don't believe
Benjamin Crump. I'm not on board with
him. I'm not on board with Will McNeel.
But we can determine what criminal
activity is. Even if that criminal
activity is clothed with a uniform,
slapped with a badge, comes with the
authority of the state, has a utility
belt, we know that that is a criminal
action against a man who didn't commit a
crime against another person. Doesn't
mean I'm on board with these people.
Doesn't mean I don't think that they're
there to bleed the system with Benjamin
Crump, but right is right and wrong is
wrong. And you can call it out because
you're principled. son did that. I had
to do
>> and he shot right and he did right
to see that
is a hurting feeling
>> to be a father that love God first.
>> Mhm.
>> And to see all my kids
>> not being able to wake up in the morning
getting a phone call saying your child
is gone.
>> That's a hurting feeling. But I thank
God.
>> Yes.
>> Cuz God got him.
>> I I I don't like when people uh put God
in him. But like like how do you how do
you say I believe in God and my son did
was right. No, your son didn't. He can't
he can't help but be a hypocrite. I
believe in God and I believe because
what he is saying and he does say
continually. He's talking about Jesus
and God all the time. What he's saying
is I believe in God and I believe what
the officers did was right. I believe
the violence that rained down upon Will
McNeel was right. I believe in Jesus.
Oh, the blood of Jesus. What a
hypocrite.
>> God would never accept the fact that
your son was being belligerent with
authority. The man told your son why you
pulled him over if your son
>> was being belligerent with authority.
And this is the core of the issue.
The deal is that we've been dealt a bad
hand in life because the unfortunate
reality is there is traffic law and if
you don't comply with the authoriti they
reserve the right to hurt you. God knows
that they have no obligation to help or
protect you. If you have any question
about that, Dashaney versus Wnebago
County and Gonzalez versus Castle Rock,
Colorado. They have no obligation to
help you, but they have a duty in their
mind to hurt you if you don't comply
with their authority. And that is the
god of Brandon Tatum and bootlickers
like him who say you need to submit to
the authority. Whether you think it's
wrong or right, you submit to the
authority right there on the on the
roadside and then you could take it up
in the court where all the chips are
stacked against you.
>> He could just be like, "All right,
whatever happens, I'm going to take it
to court." That's the legal process. God
would be expecting your son to abide by
the law. God expects your son to submit
to the evil man,
the law enforcement agent, the state
agent, the IRS agent, those people who
are trying to take from you, who are
trying to hurt you, even though you
didn't hurt anybody else. Even though
that God that he claims to serve says,
"Do to others what you would want done
to you, don't do to others what you
wouldn't want done to you." the cop
violates that law every single day as a
law enforcement officer as a matter of
course and he says you need to submit to
that evil authority and then the funny
thing is he he doing all this fake crime
and my son he just he just he he he did
the right thing your son is driving on a
suspended driver's license with weed on
him with a big old knife on the
floorboard
>> okay first of all driving on a suspended
license isn't doesn't violate the laws
of moral ity. Neither does ha having
plant matter in your private vehicle and
neither does having a knife. But he's
painting all these things out as
negative because he truly believes that
legality equals morality and illegality
equals immorality. And that is the
problem with our overall mentality.
In a in a in a simple point of the cop
saying, "This is why I pulled you over."
He no, go get your supervisor. No, they
put a They even locked. Shut the door
and slammed it in. If my son ever did
something like that, you ain't never
going to catch me on TV defending. I
don't care if the cop punched him in the
face or not. You ain't never going to
catch me defending that.
>> That's how far gone he is. If a cop
punched my son in the face for standing
for his unalienable right of the fourth
amendment not to be secure in his person
and he got punched in the face for not
having his headlights on when clearly
the traffic stop was a violation of the
cop's own policies. You ain't going to
catch me backing my son. That's how far
gone Brandon Tatum is. And I'm sure he's
thought this out, but he's so in the
tank for morality equals legality and
immorality equals illegality that he
would go against his own flesh and
blood.
>> I think the cop is wrong. I'll address
that. But I also address the fact that
my son was wrong. Driving on suspended
driver license is wrong. Disobeying a
law.
>> Driving on a suspended license is wrong
compared to right. So let me ask you,
Brandon, if you're watching this video,
what's more powerful? What's more
effective? What is what is the supreme
law of the land? The right to be secure
in your person and exercising your
freedom without having to beg the
government for a permission slip or a
license. Is that more powerful or is it
more powerful to and is it more right?
Is it moral to abide by corporate
traffic law? What's the supreme law of
the land? This brings me back to my
second question. What is the supreme law
of the land? Is it the Constitution, the
Bill of Rights, the unalienable rights
that are articulated not only in the
Constitution but the Declaration of
Independence? Or is it traffic law,
Brandon? Cuz you seem to be saying the
supreme law of the land is traffic law.
>> Command is wrong. Your son got arrested,
was found guilty. What? What are we even
talking about this point? It's a money
grab. Let's see what Benjamin Trump got
to say.
>> I want you to try to put yourself in our
shoes. try to put yourself in Williams
shoes just for a second. The police stop
you, right?
>> And tell you, you say, "Why are you
stopping me?" And they say, "Well, you
don't have your headlights on and it's
raining." And you look and you're like,
"There's no rain.
>> Why are you stopping me?" And all he
does,
>> that's not what he said. He said, "You
don't have your you don't have your
headlights on and it's inclement
weather." That was the words of the
initiating the the cop who initiated the
stop. There's a
>> which inclement weather is not in
statute 316217.
It just says during rain, smoke or fog.
>> The park's 21st century moment. He as a
black person says, you know, I'm tired
of it. I'm going to try to demand my
constitutional rights. That's the only
thing that William McNeel did and that's
the only thing you would want your
children to do. But what Benjamin Crump
won't say is that traffic law, and he's
basically saying this, he's implying
that this is what it is, but he's not
going to come out and say it because he
doesn't believe it. Traffic law violates
constitutional rights. Clearly, if you
don't have the right to travel freely
and unmolested down the road without
somebody picking you off for a license
plate cover that may be obscuring your
license plate or a prop improperly
illuminated tag light or you don't have
your headlights on. If your
constitutional rights can be infringed
upon, even if it's just temporary, then
you don't have unalienable rights
according to traffic law. And that
traffic law is the supreme law of the
land. Benjamin Trump won't say it.
Brandon Tatum won't say it. Nobody will
say it. We've got to get rid of
corporate traffic law.
>> Say, as a citizen, don't I have the
right to know why you're violating my
Fourth Amendment rights against search
and seizure?
>> Everybody knows why you're you're
getting your Fourth Amendment rights
violated under corporate traffic law.
And that's why I asked the question, if
immorality, criminality, and evil were
legalized, would you support it? There's
a whole bunch of people out there
supporting traffic law, which is a
legalization of immorality, criminality,
and evil, because it gives cops the
justification they need to interrupt you
during the course of your day for
whatever reason. Have you seen the
corporate traffic law book in your
state? You know how thick it is. That
gives that gives the cops plenty of
reasons to choose from, including the
ones that they make up that don't even
apply to you to stop you and interrupt
your travel. And that's why I also
asked, what if the legalization of
immorality, criminality, and evil were
packaged as necessary and beneficial for
the safety of people traveling on the
highway? Because that's what traffic law
is.
>> Unlawfully.
>> That's it. Nothing more. So search your
hearts, America. If this was your child,
if this was your child, wouldn't you be
proud that William kept his calmness and
his demeanor and deescalated it?
And let that govern you when you call on
the sheriff to hold these police
officers accountable because that's what
we have to get here. We have to have
accountability.
>> This why black people ain't never going
to make it as a whole. I'm Can I just be
real? Like this is why
>> like what makes s like like I don't get
it. He was just standing up a Rosa Parks
moment. A Rosa Parks moment. A Rosa
Parks moment. And he did everything he's
supposed to do. He just wanted illegal
search and seedure. There's no illegal
search and seizure on a civil traffic
stop.
>> There you go.
There you go. He said it without saying
it.
You're not being searched or seized as
you're being searched or seized, but it
doesn't count as searching or seizing
because it's legal. That's why I said,
would you support
criminality and evil if it was legal?
Corporate traffic law serves two
purposes. Number one, it transfers
control from you to the cop or to the
state agent. And number two, it
generates revenue for the state while it
takes away your rights. Immorality,
criminality, and evil is legal under
corporate traffic law. The question is,
do you have the principle? Do you have
the morality inside your heart to resist
that legalized criminality?
>> He wasn't going to search the man car.
He wasn't going to arrest arrest McNeil
Jr.
>> You don't know that. You don't know that
they will arrest you for no reason. Did
you re Did you see the recent video
where the parapolgic is driving this
blind man and the cops mess with them
after the the one cop talking to the
lady in the back is being so nice about
her dog. You don't know what a cop's
going to do. That's why you never drop
your guard around them because they will
look for any I smell weed. Hey, what's
going on here? You sure you don't have
any weed in there? cuz it sure smells
like you. Hey, why don't you get out of
the car, person who can't walk?
Why don't you get out of the vehicle,
person who can't see?
You never know. If those cops are going
to treat those people with those special
needs like that, what do you think
they're going to do to you? Brandon
Tatum can't say this.
A matter of fact, Brandon Tatum knows
that what he just said is false because
cops are looking for ways to hem you up,
to gum you up in the system, to put a
charge against you.
>> Going to do any of that. He just stopped
him on a simple traffic stop and said,
"I'm pulling you over because you had
your lights off in inclement weather."
The cop didn't say whether it was
raining or not.
>> He said in inclement weather, which
according to the law, the officer has a
right to pull you over. He said it again
even though the corporate traffic law,
their own statutes says against it.
There's nothing in 13 uh 316 217 which
is relegated to when lighted lamps are
required. There's nothing in there about
inclement weather. Even though Brandon
Tatum says it, even though this lawyer
says it, even though the initial traffic
stop, the initial officer who initiated
the traffic stop said it, there's
nothing. Say inclement weather all day
if you want to, it's not in the state
statute. And this right here is going to
be the foot in the door that Ben Crump
needs to show that this whole thing
needs to be thrown out because there's
nothing in there but inclement weather.
And there's no sign that it was actually
raining when the cop pulled him over.
>> Those conditions. Inclement weather
doesn't mean that it has to be currently
raining at the precise moment that the
cop turns his lights on to pull you
over.
>> It absolutely says exactly that. During
during any rain, smoke, or fog, you
can't pull somebody over after. You
can't pull somebody over if you see a
rainstorm coming. So, you can't do it
before. If you're going to pull somebody
over for not having their headlights on,
has to be during any rain, smoke, or
fog. This guy is out to lunch.
>> Is that you're driving in
>> and I'm not even say I'm not even saying
this right here is legitimate to give
somebody a ticket and economically
terrorize them. I mean, if the cop was
really interested in safety, he could
have said to Will, he could have said,
"Hey, just want to let you know your
headlights aren't on for safety. Could
you just flip them on for me? Have a
good day." And he didn't do that because
it's about power and control with these
people.
>> Rainy conditions. That means that the
road is rain. There's been rain on the
road. It's overcast. There clearly had
been rain. So therefore, the inclement
weather argument is very clear.
>> There is no there is from the statute.
There is no inclement weather argument.
>> And I think that you know in good faith
the officer made a traffic stop. If you
didn't agree with it, then in the court
of law, you could have contested it. But
we all know if you have paid attention
to anything that's going on that he was
found responsible for this. They did not
throw out the case because if the judge
deemed that it was unlawful for them to
make a traffic stop, they would have
thrown the case out. But they didn't. It
was upheld. He was found guilty. He did
he did his he he he the justice that was
imposed on him. He took it like a man at
first and then now he's releasing the
video. It just makes me mad because
black people in this situation do not
feel like they have to be held
accountable to do anything. The cop
punch you in the face. You have created
a scenario where a cop can use a
reasonable amount of force to execute an
arrest. And if if it's deemed later that
the force was unnecessary
>> again in a sense that tr
we live in two different worlds where
people are following two different
rules. You just want to be free. They
want to hem you up for corporate traffic
law. So if you don't do what they say
that you should do, hell is coming. And
there's no gate that's going to hold it
back because they can deploy unlimited
resources of the state to bring you to
bear. that that is an unfortunate
reality. That doesn't just because we
live in that reality doesn't make that
action right because like I said in my
last video, the video before last, the
reason we look at the Nazis as give me
your papers and and instituting
checkpoints where they hemmed their
people up, they were the bad guys. The
people who were asking for your papers
in Nazi Germany were the bad guys. So,
what do we call the people today in our
country that are telling you, "Give me
your papers or else?" They're the bad
guys. But these guys don't want to call
them the bad guys cuz they want cops to
have the authority over us.
Then then you can talk about it. But
none of what you did was necessary. None
of what he did was necessary. He did not
have to disobey the traffic law. He did
not have to argue with the cop on the
side of the road when he never have read
the statute in the first place. And the
funny thing is a lot of people are
watching the video and I said this from
the beginning because I I think I'm the
only person that's genuine about this by
by a long shot is that I said there's a
lot of the video footage that's missing
from here. What do you know? Like the
first five or six minutes he the the guy
intentionally edited out of his own
video. He he edited out of his own video
and you can see that because if you
>> So he's just going to rehash this whole
thing. I'm going to just keep this here.
Let me ask you the question again.
If immorality, criminality, and evil
were legalized,
would you support it? If there was a new
law that canceled out the right to be
secure in your person's houses, papers,
and effects, would you support it? If
there was a new law that canceled out
your right to keep and bear arms, would
you support it? Because that's traffic
law does all of that. You don't have the
He He's freaking out about a 12-in
knife, if it was even that long, on the
floorboard of Will's car. Traffic law
cancels out the Second Amendment, and it
cancels out your Fourth Amendment right
to be secure in your person.
So, if immorality and evil were
legalized, you better believe tons of
people will support it. Brandon Tatum
supports it. And it gives the cops an
opportunity and the court system and the
state an opportunity to plunder you
through corporate traffic law. And when
plunder becomes a way of life for a
group of men living together in society,
they create for themselves in the course
of time a legal system which authorizes
it and a moral code which glorifies it.
I will see you in the next video.
[Music]