A few minutes later, the superiors and colleagues arrived at the scene. According [music] to Jon's request, they called an ambulance. Jon was sent to the hospital. The examination [music] results showed multiple fractures and abrasions. After Wright conducted a search of the vehicle, he found no illegal items. Surprisingly, the subsequent investigation [music] concluded that Wright's use of force was reasonable and he was not held accountable. Further [music] investigation revealed that this police officer had been involved in incidents of excessive use of [music] force as early as 2020. However, his superior, then lieutenant and later police chief Philip [music] repeatedly characterized his actions as reasonable law enforcement, thereby indirectly condoning his behavior. Between 2020 and 2024, [music] Wright was reported to have engaged in violent law enforcement at least four times, but he was never seriously punished. 3 months later, he once again used violence to [music] throw someone to the ground, resulting in the other person suffering a broken chest. After the involvement of civil rights [music] lawyers, it was discovered that Wright had long violated citizens rights, but had not been punished as he deserved. Subsequently, several victims jointly [music] filed a federal lawsuit, accusing themselves and multiple management personnel of being negligent [music] and failing to properly investigate, although Wright could potentially face a maximum sentence [music] of 25 years in prison. In reality, he is likely to be sentenced to only a few years. In contrast, the actual consequences might be reflected in the hefty compensation payments. In similar cases before, the police had paid $130,000 [music] for settlements. The cumulative compensation amount for multiple cases could be as high as several million. This incident originated from a routine traffic checkpoint. At that time, driver John Millet was stopped and [music] inspected by police officer James Wright for not using the turn signal. Due to the incomplete vehicle documents, Wright asked Jon to [music] get out of the vehicle to cooperate with the investigation and explicitly warned him not to move [music] around. Before getting out of the car, Jon bent down to pick up the dropped lighter. This action was regarded [music] as a dangerous behavior in the law enforcement recording device. Although it was later proved that he did not carry any weapons, Wright still deemed him [music] non-compliant and forcibly dragged him out of the vehicle and made him fall to the ground. No, this is >> I'm not even doing nothing. >> Before John could figure out the situation, [music] he was electrocuted by the stun gun for a duration of 10 seconds without any obvious resistance or posing [music] a threat. This use of firearms clearly exceeded the reasonable scope of law enforcement. [music] Subsequently, Jon was restrained again because he did not immediately lie down. When he tried to call his wife to explain the situation, [music] he was pushed to the ground by Wright instead. John immediately stated that his shoulder was dislocated, but Wright regarded this as an excuse to evade [music] law enforcement and refused to take it seriously. In the position of having his handcuffs removed, Jon was pushed down again due to being unable to support his body, he suffered severe injuries to his shoulder. Subsequently, [music] Wright continuously changed the reasons for the accusation from obstructing law enforcement to drunk driving, possessing contraband, and attempted to search [music] the vehicle.