Chief, I'm working. I don't have time to argue about a jacket, okay? Don't you [ __ ] touch me. Don't you [ __ ] touch me. Don't you [ __ ] touch me. You got a [ __ ] problem? [ __ ] It's what You grab me. WHAT? NOW, GET OUT OF HERE. BEFORE YOU GET A PROBLEM. Take it, man. Take it. >> No, you're going to go in. >> Take it. [ __ ] again. From the on-site conversation, it can be heard that the director seemed to have consumed alcohol. His subordinates also hinted that he had a drinking problem. The director repeatedly mentioned dismissal and suspension, and his words were inconsistent. Ultimately, before the traffic accident was fully resolved, Superintendent Billy was immediately suspended and returned to the police station alone. Shortly after that, Billy resumed his original position and continued to serve as the lead superintendent. Meanwhile, Director Gada was immediately suspended and subjected to an internal investigation 2 months later due to the public release of the footage from his law enforcement recorder, which drew the attention of the prosecutor's office. During the investigation, Gada was on administrative leave with a salary of approximately $200,000 per year, and he announced that he would retire early in April of the following year. After the incident was exposed, it sparked intense public debate. Many people questioned the director's long-term alcohol abuse, abuse of power, and interference in law enforcement. Others believed that Superintendent Billy's willingness to resist head on reflected the long-standing management problems within the police force. This case also triggered extensive public discussions on the exercise of law enforcement power and the accountability mechanism.