So, you said there's no one else inside. >> Not that I don't believe you. Yeah. Not that I don't believe you. Check. >> No. Okay. Okay. Any dogs or anything like that? I heard a dog. >> I don't have a dog. >> All right. So, what did you say your other sister's name was? >> On October 1st, 2025, United States Marshalss executed a federal warrant in Reynolds, Georgia, leading to the arrest of a sitting city council member. This case provides a textbook example of Georgia's hindering apprehension statute and the legal consequences of obstructing federal law enforcement. >> Yeah, that's the door she came out of. Watch that door. >> Who's on that side of the house? >> Jace, >> everybody come down here. >> Trent, we got people on the other side. >> Yeah. I have reason to believe that he was staying here in his house last night. >> No, >> because his daughter >> got a lot of name. Uh >> that's your sister. >> Oh, when's the last time you saw her? >> I saw my sister yesterday. >> Was he with her? >> No, it was my old sister. Who who goes? >> Kisha. >> Kisha. >> Um, so you haven't heard? So he's not your dad. >> My dad lives in Louisiana. >> Okay. Um, all right. So he's supposed to be in prison for uh murdering people. He's supposed to be serving a life sentence in prison. He was released on accident by a different facility that he was visiting at. And you're obviously supposed to be in prison. >> Yeah. So you said there's no one else inside. >> Not that I don't believe you. Yeah. Not that I don't believe you. Check. >> Nobody here. Okay. Okay. Any dogs or anything like that? I thought I heard a dog. >> I don't have a dog. >> Um. All right. So, what did you say your other sister's name was? >> That's not her dad. >> It's not. >> But she was with Joa. They went to Jamaica. >> Okay. >> Um, do you know what they were doing in Mon? >> No, I have other people that live in Mon. >> What other family? >> Uh, Angela's, >> but that would be not his family. >> No, my mom's brother. >> Your mom's brother. So, I I don't I'll be honest, I don't have all of the I have a lot of information, but as far as like who's related to who, I don't have that cuz I just found out about this today because they're working the case out of Miami cuz that's where he was uh supposed to be in prison. >> Right. >> Um so, they called me this morning and said we need you to come to this house cuz they thought he was here. >> Um where is your car at? >> My daughter's in. >> Your daughter's in? Okay. What's her name? >> Tamari Saunders. >> Tamari Saunders. Okay. All right. Under Georgia Code Title 16, Chapter 10, Section 50, hindering apprehension requires three distinct elements for prosecution. First, the defendant must know or have reasonable grounds to believe that the person harbored has committed a felony or is an escaped inmate. In this case, officers explicitly inform Price that James Daniels was serving a life sentence for murdering two people. This disclosure eliminates any possible defense of ignorance regarding the suspect's criminal status. Second, the statute requires specific intent to hinder apprehension or punishment. This is not a general intent crime. The defendant must consciously desire to prevent law enforcement from locating or arresting the fugitive. Third, there must be an affirmative act. The statute enumerates six specific prohibited actions. Harboring or concealing the person, warning them of impending discovery, providing means of avoiding apprehension, preventing or obstructing through force, intimidation, or deception, suppressing physical evidence, or destroying evidence of the crime. Price's conduct satisfies multiple subsections. She harbored Daniels by allowing him to remain in her residence. More critically, she employed deception under subsection 4 by falsely stating no one else was inside when officers were searching for him. The conviction penalty for this felony is imprisonment for not less than 1 year nor more than 5 years. >> What title is she? >> T A N I S >> I last name is Daniel >> Gilman. >> Does she have a son? My name and then you said your daughter's name is >> Kimari. >> Kimari spell K I >> K I was shaking. >> Yeah, we're not trying to not trying to scare you. Sorry about that. Okay. >> Are you the only one that has access to this phone? So, I know he called this number back in June a couple times. >> Um, >> that's why I didn't know. >> Yeah. Yeah. So, but other than it being So, that would be your half sister's dad. >> Is that right? Okay. What? You don't have any kind of relationship with him? >> He's been friends when I was a kid. >> Okay. Um, so you haven't talked to him since he's been out? >> I haven't talked to my mother. >> What did she say? >> Okay. Um, cuz obviously it's not >> Yeah, he he's not being charged with anything new, right? Like there's no there's no new charges. And the way it works is it's a uh it's a it's called a technical escape. So he was released in error is what it's called. Um so he he was supposed to serving a life sentence with Bureau of Prisons on the fed side. He got brought back for some state charges that were dismissed and instead of returning him to the Bureau of Prisons, they released him to the street. No one's saying he escaped or anything like that. Um but we have an order signed by a judge, a warrant signed by a judge to pick him up and take him back to prison. Um so >> yeah. Yeah. Where's uh where's >> the female homeowner repeatedly denied anyone was inside [music] until the truth came out and the suspect was found hiding in a closet >> cuz I can call my mom. So, and I don't know how this all works, but they're they currently have a uh $30,000 reward to get him brought back. I don't know. >> Show me your ass. Show me your [ __ ] ass right now. ALL THE WAY THE [ __ ] OUT. >> HEY, PUT her in cuffs. Come on. Where' you shoot that? >> Right there by the door there. >> Okay, I'll get them for you in a second. >> Okay. >> They got they got somebody in there. >> Will you stand here with her? I get her shoes. I'm going to put her in my car. Now we got another I told you. He told me he's hid in there. You hadn't seen me. You didn't come up here with your sister. >> You sat here. I'm lighting my face in my camera. >> 10 out of five. >> Still cleaning the house up. >> Still cleaning the house. >> Still hold. Still hold. They're almost done, but they like >> Mhm. >> I'm not going. >> So, I'm going to try to get uh with his especially with him hiding like that. Um I don't want to put him in the back of my car to make him. >> Do we have is there somewhere else we can hold him just temporarily until I'll get somebody down here with a cage that will take them up to wherever we got to? um and see if we can uh get him squared away. And then as far as her very >> I think she should go to jail. >> Mhm. >> I can't charge her. So I can I can go try to >> This case also implicates federal law. Title 18, United States Code, Section 1071, makes it a federal crime to harbor or conceal any person for whom a federal warrant has been issued with a maximum penalty of 5 years. Additionally, Title 18, section 100001, criminalizes making materially false statements to federal officers during an investigation. Price's denial that Daniels was present could constitute a separate federal offense, punishable by up to 5 years. From a constitutional perspective, the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, law enforcement executing a valid warrant has constitutional authority to enter premises when probable cause exists. In Payton versus New York from 1980, the Supreme Court held that officers may enter a home to execute an arrest warrant when they have reason to believe the suspect is inside. That standard was clearly met here. Illinois versus Gates from 1983 established the totality of circumstances test for probable cause. US Marshalss had intelligence connecting Daniels to Price's residence, phone records showing prior contact, and specific investigative leads. This created more than sufficient probable cause for the warrant, and subsequent search. The tactical execution demonstrates textbook fugitive apprehension protocol. Officers established a complete perimeter before contact. Multiple officers with rifles maintained angular positions. This prevented escape and minimized officer risk during the approach. Under Graham versus Connor from 1989, use of force must be objectively reasonable from the officer's perspective. Given that Daniels was convicted of torture and execution style murder, the armed tactical approach was was entirely justified. The officer's interview technique with Price was professionally executed. He documented her statements methodically on body cam. He clearly explained the legal situation, eliminating later claims of confusion or misunderstanding about the suspect's status. When Price denied anyone was inside, the officer maintained professional demeanor while documenting her false statement for prosecution. This creates powerful evidence of the deception element required under Georgia's hindering statute. The federal state coordination demonstrates proper inter agency cooperation. The US Marshall acknowledged limitations of federal complaint warrants and coordinated with local authorities to file immediate state charges while preserving the option for federal prosecution. This dual track approach is common in cases involving federal fugitives with local jurisdiction assistance. >> You get a uh I can get a fed warrant for but it won't be today. >> Okay. Um, >> we got 72 hours. We can hold her there. >> Okay. If y'all will uh I guess hold her and it would be I would I would say hindering. Um, and then I'll talk to I'll give her the a USA and see what uh see what they want to do. >> Just cuz it's I can do a complaint warrant, but it's not a it's not a quick process. >> Uh I don't have the ability to I wish I did where I could like just see someone arrest them and take them to jail and see a judge, right? Um, it's a it's a much I basically have to get a judge's permission to make a a PC arrest. >> Um, >> well, can a probate magistrate judge do that or >> like a what do you mean? Like a >> Well, so no, if y'all can Yeah, if y'all will charge her at the state level, I can come back and do the do the f. >> Okay. Yeah, I'll charge her state. >> Mhm. >> The uh citizens. >> Mhm. Yeah. All right. Let me let me call you. >> Say what? >> No. >> Miss Ruby. >> Yep. That's Mr. Ruby. >> Hey, Miss Ruby. >> Hey. >> How are you? How you doing, ma'am? All right. >> So, your neighbor across the street was hiding a guy who escaped from custody for murder. >> Are you serious? >> I'm dead here. This guy killed two people in the state of Florida. He tried to kill three, but once alive. The other two died. [clears throat] Okay. He got accidentally let out. She lied to us. After we told her what he was wanted for, after we identified who we were, she said he was not inside. So, we went inside to check because we had a warrant. We found him hiding in her closet. So, that's your city council woman. That's what she does. She lied to the US Marshalss to hide out a guy who killed two innocent people. Tried to kill three. >> That's why she her ass is sitting over there right now in handcuffs. We locking her ass up, too. Excuse me for cursing. But >> that's the type of danger she put us in. This guy's going to prison for life. He's already been sentenced. So, he could have been sitting there with a gun waiting to kill somebody else cuz he might have said, "It ain't my [ __ ] day to go back to jail." >> So, that's what she doing now. She want to sit over there playing innocent. It don't work that way. >> I I I I know something bad for them have all the guns hanging around here trying to keep my pie drop. that that's what's going on here. That's why she's sent out here in handcuffs and that's why we brought as many people as we did >> because he is a danger. If he's willing to kill three people >> Yes. >> then a few more won't make that big of a difference. >> Exactly. >> So that's what's going on. >> You didn't know if someone came over and told you cuz if you was my grandmama or granddaddy, I want y'all to know what's going on. >> Oh, okay. So, you know, I try to watch out for her cuz I know she was a sickly person, you know. Well, you know, but you know Yeah. She >> She ain't sickly, >> but you know what I'm saying? She had a seizure and stuff, so Right. Right. You know, I make sure she was okay. >> She also had line of the tongue disease. >> Well, she got the line of the tongue. I know that line of tongue dis [laughter] I know she had a seizure. So, you know, >> that's that's what's going on on your street. Once we get uh everything clear, we're going to be gone. >> Hopefully, you never have to see us again unless it's a way. How you doing? And keep it moving. I'm glad this this over with then because I didn't know this was going on this close with me. >> Yes, ma'am. All right, Miss Ruby. All right. Thank you. >> Good to see you. >> All right. >> Grading analysis. Timishia Price receives a grade of F. Her conduct represents complete failure of legal and ethical responsibility. She harbored a convicted double murderer serving four life sentences. After explicit disclosure of his crimes and fugitive status, she lied to federal officers about his presence. This endangered law enforcement, endangered her community, and violated the public trust inherent in her position as an elected official. No mitigating factors exist. US Marshals and Reynolds Police Department receive a grade of A. The tactical execution was flawless. Officers apprehended an extremely dangerous fugitive without any use of force. Professional communication throughout. Evidence documentation on body cam was thorough. The operation demonstrates law enforcement at its highest standard. Reynolds Police Department institutionally receives a grade of A minus. Chief Holder statement that nobody is above the law, including elected officials, demonstrates proper accountability. The minor deduction reflects uncertainty about prosecution follow-through. As of May 2026, arrest without conviction undermines institutional credibility. Key lessons from this case. First, hindering apprehension is a serious felony with significant prison time, not a minor obstruction offense. Second, lying to federal officers creates multiple criminal exposures under both state and federal law. Third, public officials are held to higher standards. Elected position does not provide immunity from criminal prosecution. Fourth, body cam footage creates powerful evidence. Every statement is documented, making credibility challenges nearly impossible. Fifth, proper tactical execution protects both officers and subjects. Professional protocols prevent violence even in high- risk situations. This case illustrates that when individuals face conflicting loyalties, the law provides clear guidance. Personal relationships cannot justify harboring violent felons or lying to law enforcement. Price had one lawful option when asked if Daniels was inside. Tell the truth. She chose deception. That choice constitutes a felony, endangered lives, and violated public trust. The consequences are appropriately severe. What are your thoughts on this case? Should public officials face enhanced penalties for hindering law enforcement? Let us know in the comments. Subscribe for more legal analysis of police interactions and constitutional issues. Thank you for watching.