[Music] this is my max headroom and what you're about to witness is one of the most sinister sounding intros to a trailer to one of the greatest epics ever produced in the history of television [Music] there's more because you are going to see it as well [Music] and welcome back to facts or frauds make sure you hit that thumbs up button you're subscribed ring the bell for a notification so the next time i premiere video you can be the live chat with everyone else and leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you think and i've gotten a couple requests to check out prep bay and squeak versus the police and i asked my friend blue bacon to help me out so sit back relax and enjoy he is just a guest cooperate we're going to take out wards on him now that's the threat that's a threat you cannot check you cannot check out a warrant on him for nothing that's a threat and i'm suing you mr s bates i'll sue you i'll take all your money our attorney see it okay we have the right to detain for order for order to be a criminal warrant there's been a federal indictment who is who's under indictment no you're you're quoting nonsense am i quoting the answer yes you're quoting nonsense mr pratt bay stop listening to squeak and read cornell law university on warrants see look okay well am i free to go no sir you're not free to go okay i like the request mr nate robertson here right now committing the crime right now look what i'm committing you have the there's the order of marijuana coming there's no order coming from nowhere there is how you hey sir there's over marijuana coming from your vehicle you're failing to identify yourself you're resisting our our our i'm not your wife you're what you're resisting you're detainment arrested you're kidnapped station sir what else okay i'm gonna sue the hell of i'll take y'all your money i appreciate that okay i'm coming for you i'm coming for your capacity as your quote unquote public officer and i'm coming for everything just so you know cooperate and identify yourself that's all we're asking for that's a threat right there are you threatening me yeah maybe i am sir are you going to cooperate and identify you why do i have the why do i have to identify myself you're operating a motor vehicle streets of highways in north carolina you have to like call in their versus lawson says i cannot be arrested for afraid to identify so no i'm sorry stop listening to squeak again read the case look it's right here [Applause] why do i have to define myself doesn't have authority tonight and now they're trying to say you don't have authority tonight yeah what i am asking what authority are you operating under sir i'm asking you to identify yourself he's saying he's asking me to identify myself and i'm declining yeah who are you yeah you're operating on the sink and sydney charlotte who are you so are you going to cooperate now he's asking if i'm going to cooperate i've been profiting the whole time you're not cooperating i'm asking you to identify you i have a right to remain silent but sir you have the right remains silent only in the event that you've been charged with the crime you you just said but you have to identify yourself while operating yeah if i if i haven't been a cause for the crime why am i still here am i free to go no sir you're not free to go nazi i'm still not free to go i don't i don't even understand what's happening mr pratt do you want your car destroyed tonight no he's starting now he's just made another threat that now he just made another destroy my brother's car what i'm saying is now that's a threat that's another threat that's a threat that's definitely a threat we're going to break the window of this car ain't saying gonna break the window please do it what are you breaking we're we're authorized to do that why are you over here how do you authorize the break in my window you're resisting sir i'm not resisting what simply your resistance in order for me to resist be a crime so the crime is you're refusing to identify yourself during a traffic stop while operating a motor vehicle on the streets of highways in north carolina a championship is not a crown shut up you're like me part of the problem now or something sir i'm asking you to cooperate i've been cooperating not sure you're not cooperative you're respectfully declining and you're exercising your constitutional rights employees exactly i'm respectfully declining and um i'm exercising my constitutional rights to not be detained by a public employee sir you don't have that constitutional right why don't i have that constitution right your right is to cooperate and that doesn't apply to me and and you could be sued on the title 18 for the one he's about to break my window i'm asking you to open the vehicle he's got a bait he's about my window sir that's exactly what i'm gonna do what do you think you're doing squeak you better break my window you have gloves yeah i'm recording it okay record me sir i'm asking you to step out of the vehicle and identify yourself yes i'm i'm very fearful for my life now i'm asking you to identify yourself sir that's all it takes you identify yourself as a licensed driver in the state of north carolina all right sir i am asking you again and you still about to try to break the window that because it's right here can you read that's the law [Laughter] are you going to identify yourself i break my window squeak i'm getting ready to break your window sir he's about to beat my window that's another three break your window tag me in coach what this guy's trying to say is that traffic stops are not crimes which generally is not true now you could say a traffic stop is a crime because the officer is conducting it unlawfully in that case the officer would be committing a crime assuming that's the case which i don't believe it is we'll get to that though what this individual who is being pulled over is trying to establish i believe is that not all traffic stops are conducted because of criminal activity some things that you can get pulled over for are civil infractions which technically aren't crimes but you can still be pulled over for them so this idea that you can't be pulled over for civil infractions absolutely wrong i'm getting ready to break your window sir if you don't cooperate he's about to break my window i'm going to break the window that's a threat that's definitely a threat but no that's not a threat or it's controversial that's definitely a threat i haven't committed a crime yesterday i've been across because i'm going to have to commit and if you get gas in my eyes i'm definitely going to like i'm definitely somewhere i'll sue you if you even look at me he better break my window and here's how it works window broke the back window now he's busting in i'm being kidnapped sir i'm getting ready to break the front window and i thought about the other window they're forcing me at the vehicle right now sir you're now getting ready to cross the line wait put the phone down can i hold it do i gotta get out yes sir you're under arrest oh come on move it can i hold on please sir you need to go i'm getting out of the car right now because if not i already know how it's going to go down yeah under threat the rest of the choice for real because if not they're definitely going to do some crazy struggle i'm being i'm being arrested that's right he gets arrested and yes he does file a lawsuit it's filed against the original officer that pulled him over not s baits we threatened but blue bacon why don't you explain that alright it's my turn again but we have here are documents that were filed by the individual being discussed in this video and let me tell you they are absolute nonsense so let's go over some of it affidavit fact exhibit a enclosed are international treaty violations involving human trafficking and corporate persons generating income and not reporting the information of the internal revenue services uh none of that makes sense and i it just i there better be something good in whatever was filed now this was filed december 7th 2017 i believe it was sent on the fourth not super relevant but if we look at the sort of timeline of things sort of puts you put you in the right place our boy here in his court case filing nonsense says quote speeding running stop signs traveling without license plates or registration are not threats to the public safety and thus are not arrestable offenses end quote that allegedly comes from christy versus elliot now i assure you that speeding and running stop signs are threats to public safety now traveling without license plates or registration yeah an argument could be made especially in the early 1900s when this case was originally filed 1905 by the way illinois supreme court christie versus elliot now if we look through this case and we look up something like speed speeding is not in there stops stop signs not in there license no license plates not in there a lot of the words that are used in this quote aren't in the case which makes me think that that quote is not in the case and in fact probably has never existed within our legal system something you want to do if you ever hear a sovereign citizen or moorish american quote a case it's either going to generally be made up or it's going to be completely out of context for future reference our boy goes on to say from the declaration of human rights united nations general assembly resolution 217 december 10 1948 article 15. number one everyone has the right to a nationality that's right i assume i don't know if this is actually legitimate but yes everyone i assume should have a right to a nationality if you're born in the united states you get to be a united states citizen you don't just not get a nationality it doesn't mean that you can make up your own nationality because that requires you to actually have a nation which sovereign citizens do not neither do moorish americans although they certainly claim to that's actually a major difference between sovereign citizens and most americans most americans actually try to claim the united states is theirs whereas sovereign citizens generally claim that no one really has any authority over them it's a whole thing we're not going to get into it number two of this article 15 says no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality or denial the right to change his nationality again i don't know if this is the legitimate thing i have no idea but are you arbitrarily deprived of your nationality if you're told that you're an american citizen no if you're born in america that makes you a natural-born citizen in the united states denial of the right to change your nationality you can change your nationality but you can't just change it to anything you want i can't be like my nationality is a bowl of pasta right that's not gonna get any recognition not gonna happen regardless of what your nationality is though when you're in the united states you do still have to obey united states law if someone from spain comes here to visit they still have to obey all the laws even though they're spanish if someone grew up on an abandoned desert island like i actually don't i legitimately don't have a nationality i i grew up in the open ocean on a little a little bit of sand dolphins fed me well guess what they still have to obey the laws even if they don't have nationality it's crazy how that works i know if i went to a foreign country let's say romania and i slapped a baby in the face i don't get to say well i'm not romanian you can't touch me guess what's going to happen i'll give you a wild wild guess you know what you know time's up they're going to arrest me probably they certainly could does that make sense i hope that makes sense sir let's keep going through this though ah from the declaration rights of the child the united nations general assembly 1989 principle three every child shall be entitled from his birth to a name and nationality congratulations you get a name you get a nationality doesn't mean you get to choose your name doesn't mean you get to choose your nationality not confusing let's keep going definition of ld car that gives identifying information such as name age and organizational membership by the person who then carries the card and uses it to establish his or her identity also called identity card i don't know what the relevance of that is but okay that's fine we'll keep going oh amendment for the american constitution 1791 the right of the people to be secured in their persons houses papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation and particularly describing the place to be searched and the person or things to be searched that is the fourth point of the constitution what i'm very familiar with means that you can't be searched you can't be seized your property can't be searched or seized without reason that can be important in a second we'll get to that all right quote the constitution has written instrument as such its meaning does not alter that which it meant when it was adopted it means now which is south carolina versus us four through seven four four eight let's check that real quick south carolina versus us437 let's see if any of that exists oh 1905 fantastic oh boy oh boy okay that quote does exist and so does this one one other fact must be born in mind and that is that in interpreting the constitution we must have recourse to the common law yeah so sometimes you got to figure out what the constitution meant and to do that you got to review common law a lot of the time or create common law so when we talk about things like driving and traveling all that has been reviewed by courts in fact by the supreme court a few times and you know what they review and rely on common law other court rulings to determine okay what do we what do we think this actually meant because guess what there were no cars there were no cars when the constitution was written there was no concept of cars so obviously when the constitution was written that was not taken into account so what the courts do is they interpret the constitution to apply to modern day things and be like well this is what this is how it should be right for the safety of the people for the general welfare of the public we have to do things this way i don't know what this guy is referring to when he actually cites south carolina versus united states but there's a great example because sovereign citizens likes to be like no travel you still can travel doesn't mean you can drive the government's not required to give you the most uh convenient mode of travel you got feet you got hands you can crawl along the ground with by all means you can take a bus nothing's stopping you from taking a bus to my knowledge taxi have a friend drive you you do not have the right to operate a motor vehicle that's different from traveling now you can operate a motor vehicle travel those are two different things i mean i can operate a plane or a helicopter to travel doesn't mean i have a right to do either of those things crazy i know i'm not going to read all the cases there's a lot there and i'm sure that none of them are applicable maybe they are i don't know nothing i've seen so far has really been like oh gosh you got me there let's keep going through this though we have a uh affidavit of the fact exhibit b okay criminal complaint violation of secured constitutional treaty right by person working for or by cohesion with the city of fayetteville it's all capitals excuse me cumberland county jail okay uh also that seems not to make sense at all my brain is hurting at the moment but then it goes mayor nat robertson stop and frisk hate crime what conspiracy excuse me piracy not at all fraud stalking no larceny i don't think so human trafficking also seems doubtful perjury but they haven't gone to court yet so that doesn't seem correct we have pianish pionage pnh not really sure i'm sure i've encountered that before but you'll have to excuse me extortion i um that seems a little slim kidnapping new rants ransom ha and racketeering yeah i'm i'm thinking that none of these are applicable and i do want to point out that the judge is probably feeling the same way that will become relevant in a moment let me keep going through this because it gets better all right here's a complaint i am harold pratt bae moorish american huh a natural person good for you in propria persona and not pro se good for you and not an artificial corporate person uh nom daguerre i think he i'm pretty sure that's supposed to be an oh not it doesn't matter straw man nor any other fraudulent reputation as described in all capital letters so this man is obviously insane uh he subscribes to some of the most intense versions of sovereignty and most american ideology most of it is absolute nonsense nothing i've seen in this so far really seems to be correct or sensible in any way all right as dishonorably placed before this court on paper with corrupt and injurious intent by the unclean hand of others he's basically saying like look you're using my name improperly and you're doing that maliciously that's not how that works i say for the record that no foreign persons nor entities represented by them have any lawful or credible authority to quote represent me which means that he doesn't want a public defender because he thinks that that means he is entering the contract with the court and agreeing they have jurisdiction that's not how that works at all it's just it's just so stupid it's so stupid anyway on august 16th 2017 approximately 11 40 p.m estimated i think is what he means by i don't know it's none of this again i'm my brain hurts from reading this i was illegally apprehended and stopped of my travels by the way a traffic stop just because it stops you i mean that's that's part of a traffic stop it stops you doesn't mean that your your traveling has been unreasonably you can't get me on these going on these tangents it's a problem pj monterio doing business as a police officer for the city of fayetteville attempted and succeeded in an unlawful kidnapping human trafficking ransom extortion reasonable and warranted search and seizure animal abuse animal abuse animal cruelty assault and battery damaged personal property damage to property well it seems like you said the same thing twice unlawful arrest color of law violation failure to properly identify an unconstitutional abuse of power while slowly approaching a yellow light at an intersection pj monterio was doing business as a police officer for the city of fayetteville was casually taking a left turn going towards the direction i had just came from okay afterwards lights turned green and i casually proceeded to go on my travels 15 seconds later i see pj monterio doing business as a police officer for the city of fayetteville illegally performing you turn to the middle of the highway oh yeah by the way uh police officers can do that if they see some crime afoot or certainly something that they can pull you over for the the u-turn not illegal in their case for that situation after performing this action pj monterey doing business as a police officer for the city of fayetteville stalked me from 10 yards away that's not what stalking is by the way and a diagonal position stop stalking me for several minutes slowing down when i slow down speeding up when i speed up then just as i'm a few feet from the city of fayetteville city limits signed pj monterio doing business as a police officer for the city of fayetteville turns on his blue lights no way i did nothing wrong i pulled over and asked pgm ontario doing business as a police officer for the city of fayetteville whenever he reaches the vehicle his reason for pointing me over pj monterio doing business i can't keep doing this i'm gonna try as a police officer for the city of fayetteville then proceeds to lie to me and state that he pulled me because my plates not match the vehicle claiming the plates were coming back for a white lincoln instead of a red chevy cruise i was currently in knowing this to be a lie because one the vehicle was just purchased brand new off car line all paperwork correct and two in order for pj montario doing business as a police officer for the city of fayetteville to have seen my place in the first place would be if he was riding behind me instead of committing the illegal unjustifiable u-turn what yeah so it sounds like he ran your plates and they didn't come back correctly now if you're a moorish american it's not really surprising to believe that your plates are incorrect the police officer can absolutely run them there is no expectation of privacy on your plates they can check them whenever they want for no reason and that traffic stop if those plates did not come back correctly is perfectly lawful absolutely 100 you then committed the crime of not identifying yourself during a lawful traffic stop don't know what to tell you perhaps when you bought the car it was registered improperly now you can take a civil suit to whoever sold that car if that's the case i mean this was 2017 so you i don't know if you can anymore but that's absurd and then he filed all that nonsense remember all that nonsense none of it really made sense he's citing all these things well apparently the judge thought it didn't make sense either because the court directed plaintiff to particularize his complaint he was given 14 days to find his particularized pleading basically saying like look man you give us a bunch of stuff we're not really sure what you mean by it doesn't really make sense you gotta take it you gotta clarify it maybe condense it maybe expand it in the appropriate areas but you have to make this make sense why is this kidnapping why is this extortion why is this whatever it was there was a lot of nonsense and then i guess he failed to do it because on july 17 2018 the action was dismissed without prejudice meaning it can be filed again i don't know if it was for failure to prosecute and the reason for failure to prosecute was because uh the the case wasn't particularized so there you have it a whole bunch of nonsense as you'd expect from these sovereignties and slash moorish american absolute nonsense hope i helped maybe clarify i don't think i helped clarify anything there's very little that can be done to clarify but that's all i got back to you my many thanks to my friend blue bacon for helping me out on this video if you're not subscribed to him already his channel is in the description below subscribe to him now thanks for joining facts or frauds make sure you hit that thumbs up button you're subscribed ring the bell for notifications so the next time premiere video you can be in the live chat with everyone and leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you think and a very special thank you to our channel members led zeppelin werewolf girl 73 kingly 09 private jm tani a and robert morley if you'd like to become a member just hit that join button right next to subscribe until next time juanishi thank you i'll see you later