Channel operation
Preparing…
Starting…
- Elapsed time
- 0s
- Estimated remaining
- Estimating…
No changes saved yet.
Keep this page open while work is running. Estimates change with channel size; leaving may interrupt unsaved work.
View resultsTranscript Details
- Language
- en
- Format
- text
- Source
- scrappa
- Auto-generated
- Yes
- Confidence
- N/A
- Created
- 2026-10-23 01:50
Transcript Content
and friends we went over this in December of last year the Sovereign citizen child support scams continue and I've said this many times and I put a lot of work into this paperwork and you know I could easily you know double triple what I asked for but I am trying to help people I not in this to get rich I titled this video alternative methods to establish jurisdiction but before I tackle this subject as always I must stay for the record I'm not a lawyer I do not practice law and I do not pretend to calling the final case for today docket number four Graham V craft Mr [Music] craft believe you have you you're entitled to 10 minutes of oral argument if you wouldn't mind putting your your name on the record please um I'm the executor and so beneficiary of the trust and estate of Mr Kevin Dwayne craft the legal Persona you may you may proceed I am not here making a general appearance I'm here by special Divine appearance uh judge to settle a matter um to call for a constitutional Court of record to ask for a summary judgment upon the truth and facts that I placed upon the record with my documents I stand firmly on my rights um and I'm here to ask for the summary judgment please you ask for um I do also have a few questions um the I understand your prosay and then therefore you get a little bit of leeway but typically the judges don't answer questions we're the ones who ask questions this is not this isn't like a trial court where it's a very kind of back and forth back and forth back and forth um the court of appeals is is more structured in terms of the lawyers or parties come up they make their arguments uh the judges may or may not have questions for the person and then it's submitted and then we go back and discuss the matter and then at some point in the future we come out with an opinion so it it is different in that respect than trial court U understood um but I am wondering if this is a court of Constitution and what the Constitution being applied in these proceedings um the court of appeals the Michigan court of appeals is provided for under the state uh constitution of 1963 is that a yes that's the answer I'm giving you um okay um I'm asking to verify to make sure these proceedings are legitimate um the Constitution has two jurisdictions common law Amy law or Maritime tribu um and I'm asking in uh which context would this court uh try to enforce jurisdiction on me we're acting under the state constitution of Michigan of 1963 um moving forward I'm here to pretty much address the Court's era for ignoring my motions um notice of dismissal default judgment under Federal rule 55 was filed December 12th 2022 under Federal rule 55 if a party fails to respond to defendants themselves and this is confirmed by my affidavits um in other means the clerk must uh officially record a default Judgment of that party um I filed several motions and they were um ignored that's why I'm here and ha hannes versus Kar 404 us 519 1972 courts must be understanding and E and not easily reject motions from people just represen themselves and that's what took place in this matter um in article one section 17 of the Michigan Constitution prevents courts from ignoring motions and um and guarantees that people have a fair chance to represent themselves in any AR arent and evidence that did not happen that's why we're here um the state um ordered me to take a paternity test um and monell versus Department of Social Services um which is a United which is a New York state case the Supreme Court Case established that uh municipalities liability under section 1983 for constitutional violations in the context of child support cases where the appellant argues that a warrant should be required for me obtaining genetic and biological material I think it's very sensitive when a state in injects an order asking me to give genetic and biological material without a warrant um that's really sensitive material it's not like a document or anything that's personal by ological material that's why those speciment were not um granted that's why I deny any consent or any contract with the state or title for D agency to give away my biological and genetic material um uh that the case monell is relevant because it underscores the importance to ensure the government agencies like the Friend of the Court on this context these are for-profit agencies disguised government agencies like the Friend of the Court adhere to constitutional standards where collecting evidence potentially implying the need of procedure safeguards to protect individuals for Amendment that's why I ask with this the Constitutional Court um the asking for genetic material is protected by my Fourth Amendment right the fourth amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures and safeguards one privacy and assurance that any such search is conducted within the boundaries of legal requirements I see that they're not here today and you know that's some questions that uh raised um and those were my concerns on August 11 2022 the King County um ordered an appointment for me for genetic and biolog biological testing um in a testing laboratory in in a testing laboratory excuse me DNA diagnostic Center is a business and I can prove it's a business because I have their done in Brad street numbers 87718 4226 for the record weird um they also said when I I thought this was funny um the state of Michigan stated that it would pay the cost of the genetic test and if I wasn't excluded that I would be responsible for that cost and with with that being said uh that set alarms um with me because um the state of Michigan is also a business and with them fronting the cost for me uh that that presented an alarm for me because I don't choose the contract with the state of Michigan I don't choose to do business with them in this regard with another business it seems like a cion of some sort for them to upfront the cost if I was going to be responsible I do not consent to that business Arrangement moving forward um the state they they fail I uh they failed to to show uh a promisory note of a contract of any sort um I I submitted documents notice to the court dismiss uh to demand dismissal for lack of jurisdiction demanded to see an open court evidence of personal subject matter jurisdiction and notice to notice of court to refusing to appear voluntary and I do not accept the offer to contract and I do not consent to these proceedings um that affidavit or noticed a motion was submitted on on November 28th 20122 um so again I'm just bringing up the point that I submitted numerous of documents asking for Clear evidence or asking for due process also asking for just a uh just quite frankly to be transparent with what's happening um and I I I believe I deserve the right to see in writing what gives them the authority and what contract am I entering I want full disclosure in Burns 322 BR 719 a creditor must provide proper documentation such as a promissary note contract to substantiate a debt or Court claim they did not more documents I filed affidavit inserting corporate nature of government entities um I submitted that document um because I'm concerned that these are for-profit businesses disguised as government agencies you know I have proof Kent County Court done in Brad street number for the record 15290 6082 Kent County Friend of the Court dun in Brad street number 6088 33133 state of Michigan dun in Brad street number 50469 18428 these are businesses I would like to State for the record that I am not a corporation I'm a living breathing person human being with these being businesses they have to abide by the same rules as other businesses and may I give an example for example McDonald's McDonald's can't force me to eat their Big Macs they need my consent none of these businesses that I've mentioned have my consent to do business with them section 458 of the Social Security Act incentive payments to state is a conflict of interest um and it's my argument right here right now that the state incentivizes them for it incentivizes them to collect more child support and that's a conflict of interest Canon two of the state of Michigan code of judicial contact sir I wanted to just let you know you had 10 minutes you've got about one minute left so I just want to give you that heads up all right I'm moving forward I'll be as brief as I may and I want I want you to be assured everything you're telling us right now yes sir in your brief yes sir and that's that's kind of the key part of an appeal and so everything you're telling us you've already told us in your brief so I don't want you to think if I didn't say something that you missed out because it's in your brief okay I appreciate it sure moving forward the the the main argument I have here and and for you guys is is is full disclosure you know it seems like they entered me in a contract without my consent without full disclosure and that's the problem here um you know I'm here to argue subject matter and lack of jurisdiction no evidence was establish in my involvement of a common law crime or damages and I and I did not commit any common law crime um notice of court to refusing uh to appear voluntary and I do not accept these contracts and I do not consent to these proceedings was another motion or notice the motion that I submitt 11 2822 and um it's basically evidence is not they didn't provide any evidence of an injury or injured party and um Mr craft you're out of time um we understand that you raise issues of disclosure yes jurisdiction remedy and um as I indicated your your brief as with all the appellants and appal we have here today the briefs that you submit are kind of the key issue that or the key uh tool that we use to resolve cases and so I just want you to know we have your brief we're going to go back um we've had research attorneys look at it we're going to look at it again we're going to discuss your case and then you'll get an opinion from us sometime within the next few weeks if I one last thing uh you've got uh you can do it in 2 seconds I can the government must prove charges Beyond A Reasonable Doubt with clear evidence especially when making a claims against someone and I'm asking you guys right here right now they did not provide any evidence against me and I ask you to uh dismiss this without prejudice okay thank you we appreciate it y that matter is submitted and I believe that ends our case call for today thank you and five days later the appeals court denied his case sorry so what is the Sovereign citizen to do now that he's lost in the state of Michigan appeals court well of course he's taking this straight to the state supreme court cord that's right uh have you anything to add compatriot beas oh okay yeah let me see how about this um all chicks shall um be required to do it with us at all times and thanks for hanging out with us on Factor fors make sure you hit that Thumbs Up Button you're subscribed and ring that Bell for notifications so the next time Premier a video you can me a live chat with everyone else and leave a comment the comment section tell me what you think and a huge thank you to our channel members Robert Morley and D Chris Kelling goddess truth P wagal Drew B Westside girl reacts Sean old park cw1 1960 Pats cats butcher bird Jason Heaton and grindle's rage now if you're still hanging out thank you I appreciate you all hit that thumbs up make sure you're subscribed and ring that Bell and leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you think until next time I'll see you soon
Danger Zone
This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.