Sir, I'd like you up and let me talk for a moment. >> Hey, don't speak that way in court. >> What are you going to do? Throw me in jail? >> Okay. Next matter is number six on the calendar. Daryl McWills. >> Good morning, your honor. >> Good morning, Mr. McWills. Let me go ahead and pull up your case in the computer. >> I apologize for being in bed. I'm not feeling well, but I'm here with a good appearance in the background, so >> Okay. Well, it's it's not inappropriate, so that's fine. Um, >> did you receive my motions to dismiss both cases? First question. >> I I believe I've got a copy of that in the file. Let me go ahead and pull up some uh papers here from the court file. One moment. >> Yeah, there should be two cases on today and they both have motions for dismissal and all that filed into them. >> Do we have two cases on for uh Oh, yeah. I see. >> Number six. >> Number six and seven. Okay. Got Yeah, you should have 580490039 and 580424973. >> Okay. Do you see your motion to uh to globalize and to disent stand by while I take a chance to look that over? >> Go ahead. >> Quick context for everybody following along. We're in Cowitz County [music] District Court in Washington State and Mr. Mr. McWills is here on two separate noise violations, not felonies and not a constitutional crisis. >> Okay. Uh Mr. Mc Williams, I have reviewed your uh your motions and uh your motion to uh dismiss the cases against you is denied. Do you have any other argument? Uh, >> yes. I would like to set this matter over because there is a case currently ongoing and I will cite that for you. It's Master Sergeant Charles Fields, my father. Um, case number 25201292-08 in the Superior Court. It has jurisdictional authority over this matter. Um, it is currently handling exparte motions of um, stop stay of relief. I also have other criminal cases where I have an attorney who's motioning the constitutionality of the order plus getting a sound expert. I would ask to defer today's hearing to a later date to allow those motions and orders of superior court to proceed and allow my attorney the opportunity to have the prosecutor removed as well as argue the constitutionality of the legal ordinance modification. Just so you know, your honor, I responsibly in the beginning of the year um took accountability for a charge um of playing music cuz I DJ and a prosecutorial agreement was made and then suddenly months later they illegally modified the law without applying to the Department of Ecology pursuant to RCW. So, there's a lot of moving parts right now. And rather than argue today or bring witnesses, if you're going to deny my order on the face of, I would ask that you allow the superior court time for the case that I cited to make a ruling over his jurisdiction in this matter. also allowing my time for my criminal attorney to finish her filings so that I may copy and apply them into this case as they have revolving facts and similarities as well as a question of the constitutionality of the law. So I would ask that this based on her presumption that the constitutionality argument will take one to two me weeks to get in and then heard. I would ask that this be set over for a month at which point I will bring witnesses and I will supply the court with more evidence including any other filings or orders if the superior court chooses to dismiss this on the merits of which we motioned. So I do find that uh both of the cases that are pending this on this morning's docket were filed and uh notice was mailed well in in one case earlier in September and in the other case was filed towards the end of September and the notice was mailed on October 1st. >> Yes. But there's been an ongoing barrage of >> sir sir I'm speaking uh it's currently uh December 10th. I do find that that's adequate time for you to have uh prepared uh your defense. I also noticed that your uh attorney is not appearing on your behalf today. You may have an attorney on other cases, but it appears you don't have counsel in this case. I've considered the argument that you've raised. Uh and I'd like to at this point in time uh understand if I'd like to hear if you have any further argument or testimony that you'd like to offer. >> Yes. the citations that are before you uh lack police training because they were reading in DBC and not DBA and the laws specifically cited as DBA as the measurement as my expert witness will testify as well. So the two citations before you today sir were unlawfully measured in DBC and not accurately in DBA. myself, Charles Fields and Logan Fields, who I can get mustered up right now for testimony, were there when we tested sound decibels, and we have a scientific measurement. I master all my sounds through a software called Platinum Notes. So, they're all measured to 111.5 dB. So, when the board is set for sound, each song is exactly the same. And I've also built the $7,000 acoustic wall since the first charge. I've taken steps and liberties to ensure that I'm not a disturbance. However, the cases before you and these two violation codes, I believe one of them was for uh violating the decibel readings. However, the officers have already admitted on camera to me and on the record that they were reading in DBC, which is a different compression and more sensitive and not reflective as the lost states of DBA. And I believe the second one was for motor vehicle noises or horns or sirens and [snorts] horns, which doesn't apply to this situation. So it's a illegal law that doesn't apply to what was going on. Unless I'm standing wrong. There's a lot of them. These both could be the ones where they just read in DBC. So with that said, we have a problem because the law states DBA. So, the ones before you, I believe, are unconstitutional and inaccurate based on the evidence. But I am a disabled vulnerable adult and I've been subjected to violent crimes and abuses over the past 60 days. There are multiple protection orders granted for me as a vulnerable adult. That's why I would justify to you, your honor, the continuence based on the special circumstances, not your review of the calendar. But I'm happy to cite every case right now to you to show you that I've been busy protecting me and the custodial rights of my minor children and my adopted adult vulnerable adult son Logan Fields who also participates in the music. The music is for therapy purposes of which my doctors will testify. I made a prosecutorial agreement and I stayed within those sound decibels but unfortunately the officers in the beginning were reading them in DBC. Even Officer Jagger himself shows his DBC reader beside mine in a video which I I didn't have time to get before you because my life has been in danger. But in that video, he shows, oh man, we have been reading in DBC and not DBA because showing even on my porch I'm within those EDNA class A residency levels which is between 7:00 a.m. and 1000 p.m. You could be 55 dB and under. You can exceed decibel limits for 15, 10, and five minute segments by certain amounts of decibb. In this case, I would be testing scientific equipment like serum 2 presets. Sometimes when you try a preset, it fires off louder out of the decibb when it's a a DAW plugin, which is the digital digital audio workstation. So, no effort or angle of any of my music has ever been meant to disturb or annoy anybody. But I do believe in the two citations you have that they were decelible reading oriented. And at that time in training, those officers were reading in DBC and not DBA. And I was following the prosecutorial agreement at all times. What we've run into to now is several more charges which are being challenged because after the prosecutorial deal, they then modify the law without applying to the Department of where the neighbors have discretion. And since then, they've been abusing it up to nine charges now. And I've had to get protective orders from them from trying to run me over with their truck. They're making threats against me. They're slandering and liabiling me. There's an open civil case against them as well as the Master Sergeant Fields versus City of Castle Rock. They have retained a really big law firm. And right now we have filed motions even today in court for exparte to address this case among the other several noise violations. So I would ask based on the evidence alone within your police report that the officers lack training and knowledgeable understanding of decel measurements and we're not accurately reading and reflecting that. I know this because I volunteer a lot of my time with churches for LED walls, stage and their concert developments. And for the audience, we have to keep it between below 92 dB for a certain amount of time exposure or it could damage hearing. I'm very um knowledgeable in measuring decibb. And I've taken every step to ensure to make sure I'm not violating the law since I first agreed to a prosecutorial deal in which I accepted guilt without even having an attorney. But now that the city has taken to egregious contact or conduct, we are now mo motioning for a special prosecutor because even prosecutor Christopher Eastwood said he's out for my blood and he said it in front of the mayor or the uh grim law group when they were representing me until a neighbor broke into my house and tried to assault me and now the grim law group represents her. There's a lot of conflicting conflict and overlapping facts and it all originates with the city and improper decel readings, trainings and legal modifications to the law. So while these things are ongoing, I would ask that if you um um read the police report, you'll notice that this is a decibel measurement training lacking that they were coordinating at that time in the wrong measurements because any other time after that once they went from DBC to DBA, the officers acknowledged that I was within the sound limits. And I have what I call the cop line on my Flex 10. It's a DJ controller board and I have it marked so that way I know I'm always within the decibel limits even after installing a $7,000 acoustic wall. I've made every effort to make accommodations not only for my needs as a vulnerable adult defined by Washington state and federal laws to be able to play sound for therapy purposes, but I've tried to create a safe environment for my community. But the neighbors have taken to making false allegations that I have a gun and I'm pointing at them and extreme egregious acts that I am a felon as a you a felon and I cannot have guns. So I am objecting to these actions that are being done to me. So right now there's kind of a lot of things revolving. That's why I asked my motion to globalize the cases because there's training aspects to address. There's laws and ordinances to address and more importantly there was no motor vehicles, sirens, horns or anything like such taking place like further citations. So I would ask this course dismiss this on the basis that the officers acknowledge that they were reading in the wrong decel compression. >> Okay. Thank you for summarizing your motion, Mr. Mc Williams. Uh your motion to dismiss is denied based upon the evidence that is set forth in the officer's report uh on the case ending in 4973 as well as uh the case ending in uh 0039. The court does admit into evidence both of those officer reports. Uh and based upon that evidence uh I will find the uh violations committed on uh >> how do you find those violations? So I can sir I you absolutely can appeal my ruling. >> Yeah is that don't be a baby about it. >> No don't there's no issue sir there's no issue with that at all. you contact the clerk's office, you can file your notice of appeal. Uh on case number 4973, the violation amount is $13. And on the case ending in 0039, uh the violation amount is $257. That'll be that'll be the court's order for today. >> What are you citing as the basis against my actual legitimate legal motion? The evidence is what I just the evidence is what I just cited to which is the officer's reports in both matters which the court has admitted into evidence. Uh so in response to your question that is the evidence against >> sworn officers that are being s sued in a federal lawsuit for face value when they've been targeting and attacking me. >> That that constitutes the evidence against you today. Uh that's going to be the court's order. This concludes your matters. That takes his own I'd like to thank you for sir up and let me talk for a moment. >> Hey, don't speak that way in court. >> What are you going to do? Throw me in jail. >> Well, if you were here, it it might be an option. >> I bet you wish you could. You know what? Give me a real reason. A one-sided police report. The judges even said a >> I don't want to have to find you in contempt. Okay. I don't want to find you in contempt. >> This concludes your matter for today. My first amendment to disconnect at this time. You're a coward. Eric Coward, remember? >> Two cases, two noise violations, two motions denied. No trial because there didn't need to be one. Talking isn't evidence, and confidence isn't a legal defense. >> Well, you got to give them credit. >> Why is that? >> Well, they're going to keep on doing it till they get it right. >> If you appreciated this video, hit those emotional support buttons for YouTube. Like, subscribe, share, and comment. It [music] helps the channel for free. and reminds the algorithm we still exist. And a huge thank you to every one of our channel members. You keep this channel independent, factbased, and honest. And I don't take that lightly. I appreciate you [music] all. This wasn't about sovereignty. [music] It wasn't about sound science. It wasn't even about federal court. This was about entitlement and the belief that talking long enough and smart enough makes the rules optional. A lawsuit in [music] another court does not cancel your accountability in this one. Facts, reality, and the law. Till next time, I'll see you soon.