Channel operation
Preparing…
Starting…
- Elapsed time
- 0s
- Estimated remaining
- Estimating…
No changes saved yet.
Keep this page open while work is running. Estimates change with channel size; leaving may interrupt unsaved work.
View resultsTranscript Details
- Language
- en
- Format
- text
- Source
- scrappa
- Auto-generated
- Yes
- Confidence
- N/A
- Created
- 2026-10-23 01:56
Transcript Content
well then we might as well not have to have a trial' might might as well just pay the fine and be done with it and welcome back to fa of frauds make sure you hit the Thumbs Up Button you're subscribed and ring that Bell for notifications so next time Premier video you can me the live chat with everyone else leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you think now let's head to North Dakota for a special appearance by a sovereign citizen all right next case is the rep's going to call will be state of North Dakota versus Michael Scott Jacobson file 26 2023 CR 36 26 2023 cr16 and 26 2023 cr50 present in court Attorney Mary deute for the state please have a seat please please have a seat Mr Jacobson is personally present and without counsel sir good morning were you present in court when your rights were read to you earlier sir I don't consent to this hearing because of lack of jurisdiction of the Court over me I'm not a 14th Amendment citizen anymore and it's in my documentation that no no one ever reads sir I asked you a question I I told you so I am not sir I'm not sir stop talking over me I'm going to ask you a question and you're going to answer the question I don't understand so I'm asking you were you here when the rights video was played not once but twice this morning I was here do you understand the rights as they were read to you I don't stand under anybody I'm asking if you understand the rights that were played for you I don't understand okay so let's talk about what you do and don't understand sir do you understand the English language do not have jurisdiction over me you look at the documentation answer my question sir you do not have jurisdiction over me answer the question sir do you understand the English language I don't understand okay so I'm asking you if you understand the English language I don't stand under anybody sir I'm asking you if you understand English I asked the question in English you responded in English I think you understand your answer but I'm making a record sir to make sure that we're clear my record is you don't have jurisdiction over me and I'm not a 14th Amendment czen person or resident sir you even know what I've done I've changed my I've changed my jurisdiction I've gotten out of the jurisdiction of the water and I'm back on the land sir I'm alive I'm a living breathing soul and you cannot contract with me anyways yeah I'm not Contracting with you at all I'm asking you if you sir stop talking out of turn are we clear I'm asking you do you understand the English language you've answered that already so your answer is yes you understand you answered it I'm asking you to answer it sir you've answered it yourself it's not for me to decide it's for you to put on the record whether you understand the English language or not do you understand what I'm saying to you I don't stand under anybody that wasn't the question we're not going to get anywhere you do not have jurisdiction over me sir if you would read if you would read my affidavit were you present in court when you're rights were read to you earlier I've been in court many times and I heard those rights and so you understand those rights I don't stand under anybody that wasn't the question do you understand your answering asking me to do I don't stand under you sir you've already said you made a special appearance so I'm asking you if you understand do you understand I comprehend them okay comprehension is good enough you comprehend them all right do you comprehend that you have the right to an attorney I don't need an attorney do you comprehend that you have the right to either an appointed attorney if you financially qualify for one the right to hire an attorney of your choosing or the right to represent yourself if you can do so knowingly voluntarily and intelligently I don't consent to this hearing because I'm not under your jurisdiction jurisdiction of the land I not in jurisdiction sir of your contract law okay do you comprehend your rights to an attorney I don't need an attorney has anyone threatened you forced you threaten so let me finish before you start talking sir I've been here the last seven times nothing has happened sir stop interrupting stop trying to talk over me I'm asking you a question has anyone threatened you forced you or coerced you or in any way made any promises to you in order to get you to wave your right to an attorney no one has thank you so we are here today for a number of dispositional conferences a dispositional conference is a conference set to determine how you intend to proceed your honor if I can interject I'm sorry but I think there's a little more complexity to this this uh procedural posture in case 16 the defendant had filed a motion to dismiss the motion to dismiss a response was file of the state on June 28th uh the at the last status conference the defendant wished to raise the same Motion in all three of his cases the at that time it had not been served in the two remaining cases although the um motion was not still has not been served it has been filed in the two remaining cases and so I believe that there is a pending MO motion before the court uh in all three cases so this wasn't noticed as a motion hearing rule 3.2 requires that the moving party file a notice of motion declaring whether or not the motion is to be heard for oral argument to be heard for an evidentiary hearing or to be considered under briefs that notice of motion wasn't filed requesting a hearing so today it's not properly before the court even if it was properly served I brought it to the I could not get this is where I'm talking so those motions have not been served so technically even if the states file the response they're not right for the Court's consideration so the court is not going to take up motions furthermore these are judge naram's cases I'm not going to rule on motions in judge naram's case or cases that are not properly before the court and noticed for hearing so as far as the Court's concerned all that's before it today properly is a dispositional conference sir you have five options at a dispositional conference you can schedule it for a jury trial you can request a bench trial and if the prosecutor agrees and the court agrees the court can schedule it as a bench trial you can request a continuance you can change your pleas from not guilty to guilty today or you lastly can choose to schedule a change of plea for a later date let's do a continu until judge and arum gets the case so you can make a decision on it all right so what I told you before is right now those issues aren't properly before the court because they haven't been served properly following the rules serve them properly we'll just do a continu all right Mr peute your thoughts um that seems appropriate to me I believe at the last I maybe there are not notes on the docket I believe it was contemplated by the previous judge that this would be a motion hearing it was discussed at that time um the state is ready to proceed but if your honor doesn't wish to hear it today then I believe continue it until judge naram could hear the motion would be appropriate so okay could you make the decision before we even go back to trial I suppose I have to file that yes so judge naram's next court date in McIntosh County is six weeks away that' be fine it's November 13 we can't get nothing done if there's another judge here got to have judge AR well he's assigned to these cases and typically once a judge has been assigned unless there's an agreement or stipulation between the parties I'm not going to sign a motion or consider a motion that wasn't on the docket as a motion hearing so I will continue this matter all three matters for a dispositional conference and a motion hearing for November 13 2023 before judge naram it'll be set at 9:30 a.m. but I'm sure judge NM will call that case last just so you're aware of that uh Mr Jacobson it probably will be late morning before that motion is heard uh ultimately judge neram will be able to decide the Motions assuming that they are properly before the court at that time and so that means proper service proper notice of motion uh you'll need to file a 3.2 notice of motion that declares whether it's for evidentiary hearing purposes oral argument hearing purposes or both and at that time judge naram can make decisions so that'll be the decision of the court today continuance in all three files until November 13 before judge naram at 9:30 a.m. anything else Mr PE I de clear a part of the record in case 16 it was noticed as a motion hearing I understand the judges ruling I just want to make sure that what's represented is correct but I other than that I have no further comment I remember him telling me file motions for the other three put them all three on the same date yeah so as a matter of judicial economy even if it was it's not an an odyssey the code that I was looking at isn't an odyssey saying that it was a motion hearing but the notice of hearing document does say and motion hearing but in the Odyssey record just says misdemeanor dispositional conference on file 16 on the others it has not been cleared up so in the interest of judicial economy those will track together if it's the same Motion in all three files so all right with that we're adjourned in this matter thank you that G it's like a casting call for Ripley Believe It or Not in that place and thanks for hanging out with us UNF factur FR ODS make sure you hit the Thumbs Up Button you're subscribed and ring that Bell for notifications so the next time Premier a video you can meet a live chat with everyone else and leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you think and a huge thank you to our channel members Robert Morley and D Chris Kelling goddess of Truth P to wacka with side girl react Sean old F Drew bcw 1960 Pats cats butcher bird and Jason Heen now if you're still hanging out thank you I appreciate you all hit that thumbs up make sure you're subscribed and ring that Bell and leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you think until next time I'll see you soon
Danger Zone
This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.