[Music] not you have the power to do you have the obligation because you took an oath prop the Constitution they took it in violation of my Constitution right it's my private property uh like I said under that federal statute 18 USC 31 subsection 6 and 10 sir I'm done with that I'm done with that type of argument and welcome to facts or frauds what you are witnessing is real the participants are not Ang the court will call the case of the state of Michigan versus Eric Martin case number 23s 00425 for the people Mr Eric Martin please unmute your device well and state your name can you hear me I can now sir Dev e lowercase r i of the capital M lowercase a n family a living Sovereign one of the people assistant public defender Dy Libo as standby Council thank you we're here for pre-trial today andam Ben Warr is still outstanding for Mr Martin that's correct as it relates to the pre-trial uh I believe the last time that we saw Mr Martin it was on December 7th and he had some difficulty doing the video that we had sent via flash drive I encouraged him to get with his SC standby counsel who at that time was APD sandre white uh he did not appear at that next hearing but she did confirmed that they had spoken um almost every day and um that he they had reviewed the video so my understanding is that Mr Martin has been able to view the complete Discovery including all of the media um I know that we were headed to a jury trial so um I will leave it to M Martin to um confirm that so we can get going with selection Mr Martin yeah about the video and I follow I looked at the video and I also found some demands to dismiss on self impation based on the video along with some others that have not been decided on um which should be decided on before any trial schedule or anything else Mr Martin I've decided on all the Motions that you brought before me and the way this works is if I make a motion ruling then the party making that motion has to prepare the order so when you complain about no orders being prepared that's your not preparing them sir I think I think my words were very clear you're saying you're saying because I didn't style it as a motion or something what are you saying I'm saying that I already ruled on them so when I rule on them it's up to the party to prepare them that's you I did prepare them specifically my demand to prep sir you did not prepare my ruling order which was that they are denied me they're deny but you didn't rule on it does that do you have anything else you yes Miss McDuffy I'm sorry RoR I did just want to clarify one point because Mr Martin I think um mentioned that he had um he wanted to move to dismiss based on incriminating statements after he had reviewed the video so I don't know if there's a sort of Miranda issue he's raising or not but I would just um I guess for the record remind Mr Martin that when he appeared for the hearing on the five documents that he filed demands motions whatever you want to call those um Mr Martin during that hearing uh rattled off the fact that he did not have a valid license his vehicle wasn't registered and he didn't have insurance and didn't feel like he needed to do any of those things so if there are any incriminating statements that would relate to the csil in this case he has made them multiple times including on the record in this court at his own hearing so if any statements were suppressed from that media they would still come in from statements he's mating for well I object to self-incriminating uh as I pointed out state in my demand to dismiss as the US Supreme Court said license ain't necessary not using the streets for profit which the cops have no evidence so Martin you need you're gonna need to speak up if you want to have a transcript of this because it's not I'm speaking up let's see Heather okay can you can you bring the microphone closer to you Mr Martin yeah I'm sorry little closer now how's that can you hear me now is that any better how was that can you hear me now that that one clear yeah please keep talking in the same volume that you using right now so we can hear it I objected what she just said about I made some self-incriminating statements that's not true because as I pointed out my demands that dismiss the laws in my favor the higher supreme law such as statute which is supreme law of the land under article six of the US Constitution Federal statutes override State statutes along with a pack R vers b b case I uh cited and sent a quote from the law book on that clearly said from the US Supreme Court that the people have a right to use the roads not a privileged right and long you're not using the streets for profit which I wasn't doing and there was no evidence and the cops have no evidence of that so I was exercising my right to travel didn't need a license insurance registration none of that so uh nothing St crimin I say there's no legit case here and uh which is why I beat this a case on the same exact issue in Southgate same EXA issue prosecutor need to dismiss it because they know had they had to win the case the higher law is in my favor the state law is on Constitution that's assuming everyone's driving the motor vehicle when or not and I'm working to change that state while I'm going to I already got a federal lawsuit fou on it in the Detroit courthouse on a Lafia Boulevard right now I got to fight one filing fees but when I overcome that they'll be deciding on the merits and uh I will be winning on that issue and the state law will be changed it's going to stop making the presumption the state statute law that everyone's driving a motor vehicle even when it's not for profit that's the problem with the state law some constitutional cops cops are blindly following that acting as if that and then the so-called courts are acting on that presumption or everyone d a motor vehicle need license insurance or no they don't not doing it for profit exercises the right to travel Mr um I'm I'm sorry Mr Martin since Mr Martin has again um made those same statements that I referred to earlier and this prosecutor will not be dismissing anything in this case we will be proceeding to trial if he doesn't want to plead to it um let me ask the court if I could um are we ready to set this and I understand he has a desire to file an ous amount of lawsuits and Grievances and motions but the court has indicated we are past that point are we ready to accept this case for jury selection or no yes we are thank you all right any motion that was just made whatever he's entitling that is [Music] denied you don't even know what it is but anyways you still have there's still demands to dismiss haven't been ruled on as a matter of law which what lot of them are such as the state as a party I follow demanded this because the state is the party here that the state in this court so-called court has no jurisdiction as indicated as I indicated in uh in my demand under the US Constitution only sir I'm not hearing those motions again on October 26 I made a ruling on all of those motions and you have not prepared the the order to that effect we're done with those [Music] motions is that the May jury selection you H or no no it's not we're going to do a July 25th uh jury uh July 25th finalement conference okay August 9th July 25th 2024 hold on let me write this down here hold on one second one second [Music] please I'm also going to make a demand right now for a compensation also for this uh makeing me proceed against my will under threatened arrest the the so-called coure proceedings uh in violation of my 13th Amendment right against slavery um all these Court proceedings are against my right against slavery no no compation for for all the court proceedings I had to uh make in this case otherwise been arrested it was only under threatened rest it wasn't bingly Mr Martin knows that the jury selection is in person correct I haven't finished telling him all of that yet I'm getting the dates I'm gonna tell him in just one second all right the uh final settlement conference in this case is going to be on July 25th 2024 at 11:00 a. and that is on Zoom the August 9th jury election is in person and that's at 8:30 a.m. on August 9th hold on July 25th 24 right 8:00 P.M a.m so right at 11: amm sir you know I want to be understood I'm not um willingly giving up my right to be one of the Sovereign people and uh by this jury but you know jury selection is August 9th 2024 at 8:30 a.m. you said 24th 830 a.m I meant to say 8:30 A.M you the 24th now or you say the 25th August 9th 2024 at 8:30 a.m. is the jury selection sir I thought you just said July I mean 7:25 24 that is the final settlement conference that is on Zoom I got okay now now do the what's the other date now August what else August 9th okay at 8:30 8:30 what's that considered what's that called there jury selection sir now is it which is in person here now the 7252 24 is that something I have to be there in person for for the fourth time Mr Martin please listen the first event which is in July is on Zoom the last event is in person got it soing a whole bunch of all right we're done today have a good day Mr Martin byee bye you can't fix stupid and thanks for joining us on fa fries make sure you hit the Thumbs Up Button you're subscribed and ring that Bell for notifications so the next time Premier a video you can be the live chat with everyone else and leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you think and a major thank you to every one of our faxer frauds channel members if you'd like to become a member just hit that join button right next to subscribe or click on the link in the description and if you're still hanging around thank you I appreciate you all why not hit that Thumbs Up Button subscribe and ring that Bell and also leave a comment in the comment section tell me what you [Music] think until next time I'll see you [Music] soon