okay I felt like it was important for me to do this video because this is an example of accusation without substantiation is the height of ignorance I posted something today with regard to freedom and liberty and anti-tyranny and all that and this guy right here whose name is anarchy without government responded with your YouTube channel relies on the ignorance of statist belief that's where you promote the validation of Rights coming from government ever since your main Channel got deleted your truth has changed so he accused me of relying on the ignorance of status beliefs which means that I believe that people have the right to rule other people and those people who are being ruled have the obligation to obey that ruler or be in the eyes of the ruler rightly punished everything that I've ever done since I've been on the internet screams against that and exposes the people who would live like that and the interesting thing is yesterday we did a spaces event spaces is where basically people can get together on the Twitter now X platform and speak freely everybody takes turns well I was in there and the subject matter was are there good cops and it was hosted by Derek Bros delete laws was in there we had a good conversation and this guy Anarchy without is without government was trying to make the case of there's no such thing as social contract which I believe now Chile believes that there is such a thing as social contract and we need to go buy the social contract but and I don't want to get too far off in the weeds here I don't believe in a social contract because I didn't sign the contract the idea of a con contract is an agreement between at least two parties and all the terms in the are in the contract and are agreed upon in a voluntary way nobody's forcing you nobody's coercing you nobody's threatening you to sit down and sign this contract so when I think of a contract I think of two parties getting together and voluntarily agreeing on something dot dot dot fill in the blank now this idea of the social contract says that everybody in society has signed the contract and that's just not true now do we all basically want certain things yeah we want to be able to go to bed at night and not have our houses broken into we want safety there's nothing wrong with that we want security there's nothing wrong with that we want our assets to be protected there's nothing wrong with that the question is how do we achieve those goals and that's just a question for another day but for somebody to say that another person relies on the ignorance of status belief I'm not offended by that but I did ask this guy to substantiate his claim and I'm going to show you that in a second but I can only show you so much because this guy ended up blocking me but I'm going to show you what's in my notifications feed the reason I can see this right now is because it's still hanging out and my notifications feed that's why I want to do this video right now before they all disappear I'm not sure how this works so I asked him okay you made this accusation now substantiated otherwise you're just being ignorant and you're going out on a limb and you're just making things up that doesn't make the world a better place and he says it's in your contact content come on now brother I'm not the only one that has noticed so now he appeals to others to validate his claim which is no validation at all at all it's it's invalid and he also says you used to bash and ask why people were on Facebook now you use that platform more than all and I will say this I have been highly critical of all social media platforms including Twitter including YouTube including Facebook I've been critical but it would be hypocritical for me to bash somebody for using social media platforms that I personally use that is just stupid the height of ignorance one of the worst kinds of people you can have in this life is a hypocrite somebody who claims that this is wrong but they do it themselves so I don't understand where this guy's coming from let me let me see if I can find another post by him so we can take a look at it and I don't see it but I do want to show you where he the anarchist he claims self self-proclaimed Anarchist block me so I'm clicking on his name right here and it says you are blocked now the Curious Thing is he still follows me but I am blocked I can't see what he writes because he has blocked me and I want to show you from my profile at least my side of the conversation and I will show you the initial post that brought this on I think it was right here yes right here see look at look at this I I can't view the thread because you're unable to view this tweet because the account owner limits who can view their tweets that's when he blocked me but you can hopefully see my side of the conversation although not all of it because I guess if it's attached to his this is where he accused me of believing in a social contract I said I've never said social contracts exist as a matter of fact it's demonstrable that they can't exist if you take the definition of what a contract really is I mean we have to make sure that we follow the true definition of words otherwise our words have no meaning and then our sentences and our phrases have no meaning and life basic you can't communicate you have there's no meaning in life there's no meaning I've never said the social contracts exist extraordinary assertions call for Extraordinary evidence where do I promote the Constitution that's another thing he said I promote the Constitution he goes you quote Spooner but then you push the Constitution where have I ever told anyone to believe in the Constitution are there certain things in the Bill of Rights that are just self-evidently true because they align with what people call natural law or um you know basic human rights that we all have see if I have rights then you automatically have rights if you have rights I have rights if I don't have rights then you can have rights if you have rights and I don't have rights then where did your rights come from and how come I don't have them the Constitution I like what Spooner said because it's accurate and it's articulate and he puts into it he encapsulates the meanings of things in such a succinct fat and understandable fashion that it's and and what I quote it it's more than a quote it's real he says whether the Constitution be one thing or another this much is certain it's either authorized such a tyrannical government as we have or it's been powerless to stop it in either case it's unfit to exist why is it unfit to exist Lysander because if it couldn't stop evil and it supposedly doesn't promote evil which I beg to differ because Congress shall have the right to lay and collect taxes that's the promotion of evil how do how does Congress have the right to steal from other people legally but you don't have the right that seems pretty crazy bizarre and mythological to me but if it couldn't stop evil and it supposedly doesn't promote evil which I think it does then what good is it what good is writing it down if we had this codified written law called The Bill of Rights and the Constitution the Declaration of Independence and nobody follows it and worse yet the people who sort of protect defend and uphold it are doing the exact opposite of what they said they would do what good is it so when I mention the Constitution I'm mentioning it in the context of hey these people that swore to protect and serve and uphold your right to be secure in your person's houses papers and effects are doing the exact opposite when they kick down your door are doing the exact opposite when they point the radar gun on you in economically terrorize you under this traffic law which which is basically the supreme law of the land of the Constitution and the minds of the law enforcers so when I mentioned the Constitution I'm not promoting it are there good things in the Constitution yes does that mean I believe everything in the Constitution absolutely not we have to be highly critical of things now if something resonates with the truth and it's an accordion accordance with an alignment with and parallel to and complementary to the truth then why wouldn't you accept it that doesn't mean you accept the whole kitten caboodle there's something for example I don't care how against Hillary Clinton you are if she says the sky is blue and the grass is green you would agree with her not because you agree with Hillary Clinton no you're a you're a Clinton supporter because you agreed with what she said no I agree with what she said I don't agree with her that's just one example so this idea of promoting the Constitution which is a big con game it's a big shell game it's this big construct of belief it's the holy writ of the forefathers nonsense that people claim to stand behind and yet they don't and then he kept going I said you still provided no proof it should be fairly easy to do because he's like it's all over your content man and then I just said to him how can you expect anyone to take you seriously when you make unsubstantiated statements where do I push the statist idea that others have the right to rule you and that you have the obligation to obey or be punished which is the essence of statism and statism can be boiled down with these four words the right to rule I don't have the right I don't have a higher claim of your life and property than you you don't have a higher claim over my life and property than me that seems pretty basic it seems pretty fundamental and it seems pretty self-evident and if I do have the right to rule you where did that right come from and prove it prove that you have the divine right of kings praying proved that King George is anything other than a human being like the rest of us who put his trousers on one leg at a time just like everybody else did does prove that otherwise it's just a construct of belief and those can be super super dangerous leading to Major death destruction Mayhem and chaos so I just wanted to show you this and I I hate that he blocked me because I really really wanted to show you what he had to say and I'm going to put this up on Twitter in the hopes that he sees it I'm not against this guy I'm actually for him and that's what I like about First Amendment Auditors is when they stand Toe to Toe against tyrants they are standing Toe to Toe against tyrants for themselves for their families and for that tyrant in his family and for the rest of us and I know he keeps saying when Injustice happens to one man anywhere it happens to all men everywhere it's just true it's self-evident when tyranny happens to one man anywhere it's going to happen to you it happens to all men everywhere a corrupt Society it brings evil into the world in anywhere evil appears whether you're personally around it or not it is one day going to metastasize to where its tentacles will reach you one day and that's the importance of this message right here this message is a message of the golden rule anybody who violates it should be called out by and will be called out by a just Society and it's never a measure of good mental health to be considered well adjusted to a profoundly sick society which is exactly this kind of society that we're living in so I appeal to you Anarchy is without government which I totally agree I agree with the assertion that there is no social contract because if you if there is then you have to prove that it exists you have to prove the idea exists you have to prove that I signed on to it because if I didn't sign on to it then I don't agree with it and I'm not a part of that contract you can't force me to be a part of the contract legitimately that's that that the core of evil is to force somebody to do something that they don't want to do simply because you think it would be good for them that is the core of tyranny it happens in on any level of crime to anybody whether it's individual or a group crime whether that that group of thugs walked into that convenience store with guns blaring and you know robbing the cash register and breaking and stealing things or whether it was somebody who pulled a chick over and decided to have his way with her in a in a bad way or adults doing bad things to Children the core of that is the person is doing it to the other person believes that he has the right to do it or he wouldn't do it and they believe that you are less than them or they wouldn't be doing it to you and that is the fundamental underpinning mentality of any criminal activity whether large scale or small if you disagree with anything that I said here or you think that something that I said could have been articulated a little bit more clearly because hey let's face it none of us is greater than all of us leave your thoughts about this for the world in the global thought police in the comments section below remember it's not cliche to say the price of freedom is eternal vigilance it's not a cliche to say that freedom is dangerous but I'd rather have dangerous freedom than peaceful slavery I will see you in the next video foreign