You once again, as a lawful order, to exit the vehicle. >> People all over America still seem to think that government oppression and abuse of power is only relegated to those few bad apples we always hear about. In this video, I'm going to demonstrate that it's not just a few officers from a few different law enforcement agencies across the nation who like to hammer us with their authoritay. It's not just a female cop problem or a male cop problem or a black cop or a white cop or a skinny cop, a fat cop, or a short cop. As the Stanford Prison Experiment clearly demonstrated, it's an authority problem. Turns out when you give somebody power over others, it's very rare that that power is not abused. As a matter of fact, you can count on abuse. These abusers believe suspicion is a crime, constitutionally protected activity should be punished, and that they are the rightful punishers. In this one, a female officer claims that she's investigating a potential crime after an anonymous caller reported an unknown man walking a public sidewalk taking pictures of houses. She thinks that's enough to demand his ID. >> I got a call >> Okay. >> about a suspicious person who is walking up and down the road approaching houses. >> Okay. >> And investigating a potential crime. >> Okay. >> Are you going to give me your information so that I can investigate? >> You suspect me of committing a crime? Well, I can just tell you I was on the sidewalk. I was taking pictures of this house for a reason that the owner knows. And that's it. >> Okay. Can I have your ID, please? >> I'm not going to provide you the ID unless I've committed a crime. >> I'm investigating a potential crime. >> Okay. What What are you investigating? >> saying that you are taking pictures of more than one house. >> Okay. >> Okay? It is my job to make sure that you are not casing any houses. >> Okay. >> All right? >> What crime do you suspect me of committing? >> I have already explained that to you, sir. >> Can you articulate a crime? >> information that I'm requesting or not. >> No. Are you going to articulate a crime? >> I've already explained that to you multiple times. >> Yep. >> Okay? >> So, you suspect me of being suspicious. I'm requesting a supervisor. I'm formally requesting a supervisor, Officer Matthews. >> Okay. And I'm formally requesting your information. Not to mention >> Is that a lawful order? >> Yes, it is. >> No, it's not. >> Okay. >> You're You're attempting to use the color of law which would be violating my rights. >> Not violating your >> Actually, it's the color of assumption because all she's suspecting is that he's suspicious, which is ridiculous. It's never a crime to photograph from a public sidewalk. >> It is my right. >> Yes, you are. You're attempting to You have not done it yet, but you're attempting to. >> The other concern is that if you are going house to house, which is the call that we got, is that you have to have a license in order to do that. So, have you filed a license with the city of Battle Creek? >> So, that is if I am pedaling or panhandling, which I am doing neither of which. >> Which is also what we're trying to identify, right? Which is also a crime. >> Okay. >> So, I do have a legal right to obtain your identification, as I've explained on multiple occasions. >> Because I'm expressing my rights? I'm exercising my rights? That's why it's a problem? I am. >> You're not. I've explained the legal right that I have to obtain that information. >> No. >> And you are >> This The >> obstructing that investigation. >> Secondary crime. >> And not allowing me to >> So, cite me a Give me a statute that tells me that you suspect me of committing a crime. Cite the statute. >> A statute term? >> Yes, you have to cite a statute. You have to supply me with reasonable articulated suspicion of a crime. What is the crime that you suspect me of committing? >> I've explained it. >> I don't need a statute. I can just arbitrarily accuse you of anything that I want, sir. >> multiple times. So, I don't know how else to explain that to you. And I hope you have a good day. Take care. >> Can I request the incident number? Officer Matthews, are you not going to provide me with the incident number when I request it? Or the supervisor when I request the supervisor? >> If you want to talk to somebody, you can call, okay? >> Okay, who's your >> provide you with your information. I'm not going to provide you with the incident number because I don't know what you want. >> What's your sergeant's name? >> It's Sergeant Hanley. >> Sergeant Hanley? Okay, perfect. Thank you. I'll be filing out with a formal complaint. >> See, the problem is most Americans just roll over and comply because they've been taught in their 15,000 hour indoctrination program that you're a good boy if you submit to the law enforcers. Cops also believe that every one of their commands is a lawful order and you must comply. And they absolutely love Pennsylvania versus Mims because it allows them to circumvent the Fourth Amendment that they swore to protect and defend. >> You, once again, is a lawful order to exit the vehicle, okay? I'm not trying to make this any harder than it needs to be, but I'm asking you to exit the vehicle now, okay? >> I am not exiting the vehicle. I feel safe here. You have a You have >> No, no. Watch her. >> I'm not going to cause any issue, but I am not going to leave the leave my vehicle. I feel safe here. Y'all have weapons. I do not. I am not leaving my vehicle. >> Ma'am, all we need you to do is step outside, okay? >> And why is that? >> Again, ma'am. >> Tell me why I need to leave the vehicle. >> lawful order to exit the vehicle, okay? >> Tell me why >> Watch her, okay? >> I need to leave. >> Watch her. >> Could I have a supervisor, please? >> Just hold on a second, ma'am. >> Could I I a supervisor? >> I believe someone is coming. I >> I would like a supervisor. >> Okay. Let me know. >> And your your name and badge number, sir? >> Chavis. >> And your badge number? >> 75. >> 75? Thank you, sir. >> All right, ma'am. Again, I'm going to ask you this is a lawful order to exit the vehicle, please. >> I am not exiting the vehicle. I feel safe here. >> Yes, I'm I'm glad you feel safe in your vehicle, ma'am, but again, this is a lawful order and you're to exit your vehicle now. >> Please Please tell me why I need to exit. I'm not the driver. >> Ma'am, >> not the driver. We are traveling. >> You are traveling and this is a lawful order to exit the vehicle now, please. >> Please tell me why. >> Escalation, intimidation, and violation. That's what a cop specializes in. And remember, in this video, I'm just giving you examples of those violations. We're not seeing these videos all the way through to the end. We know that cops are very scared. They believe that their word is the law of the land and they will pick on anybody because they know they have the power and authority. The prevailing belief among police became if they got a call, that alone is reasonable suspicion to demand ID. In their mind, "We got a call" is a trample the Fourth Amendment right for free card. In this video, this cop demands ID of a passenger after they just got done pulling the driver over for a vehicle infraction. >> Can I see your driver's license? >> For what? >> So I can identify you. >> This stop is right here by the way. >> You're 20 years old? >> This stop is right here with him. I'm a passenger. >> Yeah, you have to give me your ID if you're a passenger. >> For what? What law? >> You have to give me your ID. >> What law was that? >> You have to give me your ID if you're a passenger. >> What law is that? >> There's case law on that. >> Okay. You want to take me to jail for it? >> I'm telling you just give me your ID. >> I'm not going to give it to you. >> Okay, you have a good day. >> Bye-bye. You're going to arrest me for not IDing as a passenger? >> Why do you refuse to identify yourself? >> Yes. >> You refuse to identify yourself? Okay, have a good >> Arresting the passenger of a vehicle for failure to ID. >> What's your name? You want to start fresh? I'll tell you my name. You give me your name and your badge number and I'll give you my name. I'm going to tell you why I did what I did, okay? >> I would I would love to hear. >> Okay, this is a vehicle that matches the description of a felony vehicle, okay, that we've been looking for for the last week, okay? I told you to identify yourself. You refused. So, I had you step out. >> Listen, listen, listen. >> I was I was I was conducting investigation, so I could Listen, listen, listen, listen. I talked to my partner to see if this is the vehicle that we're looking for. It's slightly different, so I I didn't I I'm comfortable. >> Like a man, give me a hand. >> Okay, you see, it's not about me trying to I'm not trying to >> I'm not going to give you my >> I don't need your name anymore, cuz I Now I know Now I know Right, but now I know That's why >> You do know you're going to get sued, dude. >> I appreciate I appreciate you. I appreciate you. I'm a struggling struggling construction worker, dude. And this money is going to come right from the state of where I love you, dude. What's your name again? >> Etchberry. >> Edge? >> Etchberry. Can you mind? >> What was your badge number? >> 46070. >> 4670 for the record. >> 46070. >> 460 >> 70. >> 70. He's very courteous now. But not when you pulled me out of the car. >> I was courteous from the beginning. >> By pulling me out of the car? By pulling me out of the car? >> What what >> Finding out who I am, what is it going to do for your vehicle? >> Courteous tyranny is still tyranny. Nice tyranny is still tyranny. Tyranny with a smile is still tyranny. >> The vehicle doesn't match the description. >> I have to investigate that first. >> So, what does it have to do with me? Bro, I'm a hard working man. I love you guys. I'm a strong believer in you guys. >> okay. >> My best friend is a sergeant. >> Hopefully he doesn't believe so much in the thin blue line now. >> And I'm going to call him right now, dude. It's going to suck for you. >> Okay. >> And you took an oath. >> Yeah, I did. >> Did you Did you swear to it? >> Yeah, I did. >> You watch Tik Tok? >> No, I don't have Tik Tok. >> You should You should check it out. It saves your dude. Cuz now your qualified immunity is gone. And your badge stripped. >> That's your opinion. >> It's not. It's going to be the judges. And can I have a business card? We don't have business cards. >> You got your congressman? Tell him that we should have business cards. >> We should, huh? Hey sir, officer, I need your name and badge number. Oh look, he's going to give me a business card? No. I thought you had a business card for me. Damn, dude. No business cards. Miami-Dade doesn't have business cards. Oh, my fault. Yeah. >> It's all this. >> 6049. >> It's Gonzalez, you mind? >> 4609. >> You got to write it down. >> It doesn't matter. It's on the record. I'm I'm I'm Gucci, dude. Hey. Remember me. Remember me. Please. I love you guys. You're the best. Dude, you guys are the best. The absolute best. >> In this video, Cherokee County deputies sat neighborhood kids on the curb in cuffs like dogs, thinking they had busted the biggest Mexican drug cartel in the land, and then told a neighbor who tried to record the incident to keep on moving instead of welcoming the video transparency. >> Hey, why don't you get moving? >> Yo, what do you mean? What you mean keep moving? >> Like I said, keep moving, my man. >> Come here, I'm not moving. Okay, I'm here. So far away from you. >> All right, bro. >> I'm Yeah, you said >> All right. Sorry you feel that way. >> You feel that way. I'm just recording. >> All right, bro. >> I leave here. >> Hey guys, so are we going to be circling vehicles around harassing them? >> No, I'm just talking to him naturally. >> Yeah. Are you guys going to be putting your lives on the line cuz the vehicle's not going to lose against that. I'll tell you that. >> All right, cool. >> Thank you for your time. >> You'll you'll pick up too. You want to call the record that lady? We got ourselves a deal. It doesn't make sense. >> Gaslighting little kids ridiculous. That right there is how you earn the hate. And just to refresh your memory on how much disdain and contempt they have even for their own laws, but especially for your freedoms, I give you this. >> Is there any reasonable suspicion that she was committing a crime? Yes or no? >> We weren't sure what she was doing. >> Okay, so if you don't know what somebody's doing, do you have reasonable suspicion that they're doing anything in particular? >> No, but we have a reasonable response to ask what she was doing. >> Right. Agreed. You could ask her what she's doing. And when she refuses to answer, are you now allowed to detain her? >> Yes. >> Who told you this? That you get to detain people who are videoing and refuse to identify themselves when asked. Are you familiar with the Fourth Amendment, by the way? >> Vaguely. >> What does it say in your own vague terms? >> Uh no illegal search and seizure. >> Right. Unless there's >> probable cause. >> Or >> That's about all I know. >> Okay. All right. Good enough. He said that's about all I know. All right. Um Now, there was somebody else who asked you the same question that I just asked you about your familiarity with the Fourth Amendment. Uh who's in this room right now? Do you know who that person was? My client, Miss asked you that, didn't she? >> I don't recall. >> She asked you, are you familiar with the Fourth Amendment? Do you not remember that? >> No. >> I have to call a lawyer. >> Okay. Call your lawyer. >> That includes my camera as far as um anytime. >> Well, it's already on. >> If you're familiar with the Fourth Amendment >> Oh, great. Why do we always get the crazies? >> I don't know. >> If I tell you that your answer was, "Oh, great. Why do we always get the crazies?" Would you dispute that? >> No. >> Does that sound like something you would say to somebody? >> That's something I did say that day, yes. >> So, you remember saying that? >> Yes. >> Okay. Do you remember saying that in response to the question, "Are you familiar with the Fourth Amendment?" >> No, I just remember saying it. >> They truly believe you're crazy if you assert your rights, the same rights they're supposed to be protecting, but you're the one who's crazy. >> Why is it that you felt she was one of the crazies? >> Well, when people act in a way that is not in their best interest. >> [snorts] >> How was she acting that was not in her best interest? >> Well, at any time, all she had to do is identify yourself, we could have done our report. >> You have an option. All you have to do is show us an ID so that we can do a report and we'll let you go on your way. >> And everything could have gone the own >> And if if some At any time she could have submitted to our authority and not stood on her own unalienable rights. >> What if they were to threaten you that unless you comply with their demands, they're going to put you in handcuffs, would you automatically necessarily comply with their demands? >> Yes. >> You would? >> That's all speculation. >> He was able to answer. So so you would. So even if even if there's somebody who is acting as a law enforcement officer giving you an unlawful order threatening you with detainment or arrest or 90 days jail if you don't comply with their unlawful demands, you would still comply? >> Yes. >> All righty. Is that what you expected her to do? To comply? >> Yes. >> Is there a law that requires people to identify themselves when requested by law enforcement? >> I don't know. >> They don't know and frankly, they don't care. Power corrupts and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely and even more than that, power draws the corruptible and that's the problem with American law enforcement today. They believe that they are your masters and you are their subjects. Leave your thoughts in the comment section below. If you like these videos, like this video, share this video, subscribe to the channel, hit the bell notification icon and I will see you in the next video. >> [bell]