Over the past couple months, I featured multiple exclusive stories. You had GUNS DRAWN ON DOGS. >> ABSOLUTELY. Do you want to get bit by a dog? Have a good day, Mr. Thank you, Mr. Have a good day, Mr. Hey boys, were you offended by his language? Most were sent in by viewers of the channel that personally suffered from unconstitutional behaviors of their local law enforcers. WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> MOVE. WHAT IS YOUR NAME? DON'T TOUCH ME. Don't touch me. Get behind the >> Don't touch me. Don't Don't put your punches. And what could be a better way to celebrate the end of 2025 than with a few updates on some of the most ridiculous encounters? I'm going to break this window and I'm going to pull you out if you don't get out on your own. Are you really going to You have to be this this aggressive with me, man? Hey, come out, dude. Keep hitting me, [ __ ] No. KEEP HITTING ME, [ __ ] NO. KEEP HITTING ME, [ __ ] TO VIEW any of the following encounters in full, use the links provided below. The first incident was submitted by Mike from Centerton, Arkansas, where Sergeant Nick Green and Officer Travian Cain responded to a call about loose dogs. Oh, crap. That sounds a little different. Oh, watch out. Hey, get back. The videos appeared to be edited by the department, but the videos still showed the egregious conduct of a supervising member when the officer appears to retaliate against a bystander who was returning home from work. Upon their arrival, they find two dogs in a backyard, but the gate leading to the street was open. The video begins mid-conversation with Sergeant Green telling his partner that he'll shoot the dogs before they even made contact. I'll shoot this little [ __ ] Yeah, I I I'd definitely like to secure them in there at least. >> Okay. I don't know. Come here once. I don't have a baton, do you? Yeah, I do. I'll just get that thing out. Oh, crap. That sounds a little different. Oh, watch out. Hey, get back. Oh, [ __ ] Don't let it get to you. As the officers back up towards their cruisers, Michael drives up from the rear on his way home. Back up. Back up. Who are you talking to? I don't He asked you to back up. What did you say? I said, "What do you mean back up?" >> He's asking you to back up. We're doing something right now. We have guns out. We're getting charged by by animals. Yes, we're about to Yeah, they're out trying to exactly that and you could get [ __ ] animal. >> Okay. Which we've already tried. Where Where did he go? Huh? Where did he go? That guy? Yeah. He circled back. I'm going to move down there to the front of his house. Okay. Oh, here he is. Here he is. You said those are your dogs? >> Nope. They're not your dogs? Nope. Nope. He said they're not his. Huh? He said they're not his. >> This guy? Yeah. What the [ __ ] is your deal, then? He said something about his dogs. Yeah, I asked him. I said, "These are your dogs?" He said, "Nope. Nope, not mine." So. I don't know what the [ __ ] his problem is. Yeah. Yeah, I got him figured out now. Michael Yeah. I don't know what his [ __ ] attitude was, telling us to get the [ __ ] out of the way. >> Yeah. Both officers suddenly shut down their body cams and the dogs escaped the area. Several minutes later, the footage is edited again to start mid-conversation. The footage provided shows that Sergeant Green had lingered outside Michael's house. When you told him to back up, he goes, "Get the [ __ ] out of my way." is what he said. Sergeant Green spots Michael outside and returns to escalate the incident. Neither of those dogs yours? No. No? Those are the ones you said were yours or no? I have nothing to say. Okay. I said don't pull your guns on dogs. Yeah, absolutely. When they're trying to attack people? Yeah, they were attacking Hey, were you here? That's right. Thank you, sir. Have a good day. Have a good day, Mr. Thank you, Mr. Have a good day, MR. WHAT? 726, COME BACK OVER HERE. OH, [ __ ] I'M trying Come back over here. 10-4. Hey boys, were you offended by his language? Yeah? Okay. So, what's the problem? Nothing. I was surprised that y'all are pulling guns on dogs. >> Yeah, absolutely. When we've got We've received multiple phone calls that they're attacking other dogs because I ran your tag to figure out who you are. >> Why? When you're running up behind us. What do you mean running? It's this [ __ ] direction. >> When we ask you to back up, you have no reason to say anything. Those dogs I stopped and I'm allowed to say You started yelling your running your mouth about it. >> Because you had guns drawn on dogs. >> Absolutely. Do you want to get bit by a dog? I I'm not out there antagonizing it. What do we antagonize it? I don't know. You That makes absolutely >> up. All I saw was two cops with guns out. >> had dogs running at us. Okay. >> He almost bit someone else, too. Absolutely. All right. So, what's the problem? >> To figure out who you are. >> For what? To figure out who you are. >> For what? You interjected yourself and said, "Why do I need to back up?" when we asked you to When I was driving in your direction. When we were operating within a law enforcement capacity. Okay. You You You don't want You don't want to have a conversation. No, I think it's [ __ ] ridiculous. That's all I said. >> That's fine. Guess where those dogs ran out of. When we were here. TURN OUT >> YOUR BACKYARD. OKAY. THERE'S [ __ ] YARDS THAT I DON'T HAVE GATES. THEY CAN GO ANYWHERE. GREAT. WHERE DID THEY GO? >> DOGS COME from today, though? I have no [ __ ] clue. Out of your yard, sir. >> And? So, what do we assume? Hey, the dogs are returning to a yard when they have everywhere else to run. You go check their yard, see if it's their dog. That doesn't make any sense. Neither does it [ __ ] coming out of my backyard. It doesn't. >> Really? Because Okay. You're right. It doesn't make sense. >> would you assume >> So, you would assume that one is coming out of your backyard. Hey, man. One would think that dog probably belongs here. Why wouldn't it feel safe here? Are you going to go check on them? Yeah, absolutely. You going to run their tags, too? Huh? You going to go run their tags, too? >> to, absolutely. >> For what? Are they interjecting themselves in this? I didn't interject it. Absolutely, you did. Okay. Have a good night. Hey, YouTube, bud. Absolutely ridiculous. Michael filed a complaint and requested the body cam audit logs. The audit logs should show who uploaded the body cam videos, who has viewed the videos, what case number they were assigned to, who edited them, and more. But much of the information that we normally receive from the audit trail is missing. Instead, they show that a single person uploaded the video, created the record, assigned it to a case, and immediately added a redaction upon uploading. It does not show who made the redactions or what redactions were made and why. And as of the date of publishing this video, no further response has been received concerning the strange edits. However, we did receive word that Sergeant Nick Green was suspended for his performance on this encounter. Sergeant Green was found to have violated the department's code of conduct standards, employee responsibilities, unbecoming conduct, and professionalism. He was suspended for 7 days without pay over Thanksgiving. Our next update begins as officers surround a home in Greeley, Colorado after receiving a noise complaint stemming from a house party. Greeley PD, somebody needs to come to the door right now. They're all hanging out right there. You can see all their heads. Hello. Officer issue, Greeley PD. Yeah, I'm sober right now. Okay. Well, how are you doing? Good. So, what's going on tonight? Uh there was just a little like house party function you're all having. Okay. Just a little hangout. Okay. Keeping officers Who's going to Hello. When we knock on the door, answer the door. Yes, sir. Okay. We'll be contacting the property owners. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. >> This is not okay. Yes, sir. How many of these under age in there? I cannot tell you. Okay. I don't know. This is not appropriate. Yes, sir. You guys saw us coming. You shut the door. Answer the [ __ ] door. Yes, sir. Do you understand? Yes, sir. Everyone needs to leave. I'm not worried about giving out MIPs. Thank you, sir. What I am worried about is this behavior. I don't have to say Okay. >> Understood. While waiting to speak with a tenant at the back gate, a viewer named Brendan arrives in the alleyway. Yo, what up? Sup? What's going on, guys? Not much. Trying to get inside? Nah. Now, are you going to walk around? Yeah, that's fine. Sounds like the party's shutting down anyways. Yeah. Do you have ID on you? Oh, yeah, I do have ID. Do you mind if I scan it for you? Do you have your ID on you? Do I have my ID on me? I do not. Okay. Can you wait just a minute? How many of them are underage? Brendan knew immediately that the officers' questions were aimed at charging the individuals at the gate and others still inside. He realized that he was standing in a public alleyway and that his friends were at risk of incriminating themselves. So, he reminded them of their right to refuse to answer the questions being asked. Hi. You don't have to answer the questions. You all right, by the way? Thought you weren't here, man. Honestly, I could not tell you. Yeah, he's probably leaving. >> Okay. I can go anywhere and What's your name? It doesn't matter. Yeah, you're part of this party. Are you 21? Yeah. I'm not part of the party. Yeah, you are. You're wandering around. >> Yep. Cuz right now you're obstructing >> in the party. Okay. I'm going to need your ID number. Why? I wasn't in there. Now you're Now you're hindering our investigation here. So, what's your ID? I'm telling them they don't have to answer questions. Cool. Or you can move on. We're going to handcuff you if we can't identify you. Sorry. For what? Did I commit a crime? You're obstructing our investigation right now by pulling our attention away from what we're doing. You can go help them. I'm I'm just saying they don't answer their questions from the public public spot. Brendan is arrested for failure to obey a lawful order and possession or consumption of alcohol as a minor. However, the officers never witnessed Brendan drinking, nor did they have witnesses declaring that he was. The officers claimed they could smell alcohol, but had stuffy noses. They also claimed his speech was slurred. But the video shows him speaking clearly. What's your name? It doesn't matter. Yeah, you're part of this party. Are you 21? I'm not part of the party. Yeah, you are. You're wandering around. Yep. I know you're obstructing I wasn't in the party. Okay. I'm going to need your ID, Neman. Why? I wasn't in there. Yeah, now you're now you're hindering our investigation here. So, what's your ID? I'm telling them they don't have to answer questions. Cool. Or you can move on. Put on handcuffs, we're going to identify you. Sorry, sir. For what? Did I commit a crime? Brendan was confident that he hadn't been drinking and requested the opportunity to prove his sobriety by blowing into a PBT. I'd like to blow in a breathalyzer for the record that I wasn't drinking alcohol. But no breathalyzer was given and no field sobriety tests were administered to determine his level of impairment. Furthermore, based on the GIS map, the alley is a public right-of-way. The officers cannot lawfully order him to leave just because they said so. They would need a lawful basis or a recognized legal reason. But similar to how the sergeant treated the tenant, You saw us coming. You shut the door. Answer the [ __ ] door. Yes, sir. Okay. Next time you hear us knock on the door and you see us coming, answer the [ __ ] door. Or you have to go. Okay. Yeah. It's likely that he expected Brendan to simply obey because he told him to without due consideration for his first and fourth amendment rights. His arrest appears to be nothing more than retaliation. You're obstructing our investigation right now by pulling our attention away from what we're doing. You can go go help them. I'm I'm just saying they don't answer their questions. He's definitely here drinking with everybody else that didn't want to get MIPs. Yeah. I find it so odd how you say the only thing that can be proved is the body cam but I smell I smell alcohol. He's a lawyer, did you know that? Who? This guy. I'm not a lawyer. I just know my first and fourth amendment rights. [Applause] Several minutes later, they released the allegedly intoxicated minor with a citation. Failure to obey a lawful order, possession and consumption of alcohol with a minor. You're going to have court Consumption of alcohol? September 15th, 2025. >> go in the party, man. 1:00 p.m. at 1001 Lemon Avenue. Brendan showed up for court on December 15th and the charges were dismissed with prejudice. He is currently in the process of filing a lawsuit against the involved officers and when that happens, I'll update you here. Finally, in early November of 2025, a viewer named B received a call from his fiance informing him she had been involved in a minor traffic accident. B arrived at the scene shortly after to assist with the vehicle. Several deputies of the Citrus County Sheriff's Office then responded and turned the accident into a DUI investigation telling B to stand back, which is when he began recording. It's voluntary. Sir, stop talking. I'm allowed to talk. I'm in public, sir. If you keep interrupting the deputy, I'm not interrupting anybody. If you keep interrupting the deputy, you will find yourself in handcuffs and go to jail. The deputies now moved the driver behind their vehicles to prevent B from recording them and advising his fiance of her rights. You can refuse. What? You can refuse. You know, you keep It's not interfering. I'm in public. >> her to talk I'm in public. You're interrupting the investigation. Hey. >> Listen, let me let me explain something Explain all you want. >> There's something called the Halo law. Are you clear of that? Right? Are you clear of that? >> Elaborate. >> Okay, so you got to stay 25 ft back and not interfere not interfere with us. Florida's Halo law refers to a statute that went into effect in 2024. The law makes it a crime to approach or remain within 25 ft of an officer who's performing certain duties after being warned to stay back. However, the statute explicitly requires a mens rea element. The person must willfully impede, provoke, or harass an officer and refuse to comply with the dispersal order. Speech alone is not impeding. Furthermore, the statute does not allow officers to create a speech free zone. This means verbal criticism, commentary, and even giving instructions cannot be criminalized. Am I allowed to express myself? >> Do I have a first amendment >> to me real closely. Listen to me real closely. Does the Halo law trump my first amendment right? I'm asking you. >> Listen to me. >> I'm asking you. No, you you Because you're interrupting with the investigation. You're asking a question that he's going to explain to you, but you won't just shut up and listen. >> I'm literally willing to shut up and listen. I'm asking a question. Does the Halo dot whatever this Halo thing is, does it trump my first amendment right to speak in public freely? >> Okay, so listen to me. >> Does it trump my first amendment right? >> that's the first part of it. That's the first that's the first law, right there. Okay? The second one is also called He's trying to tell you. He's trying to tell you but you won't shut up. Is that does it trump my first amendment right to speak in public? >> okay? Every time cuz from what I'm my understanding is that you keep interjecting, okay? And that's what's going on. But here's my here's Listen to me. Listen, can you let me talk for 2 seconds? >> you talk. Okay, so I don't need to let you talk. You can just talk. >> done. Next next next time you cause her attention to come off that deputy I'm letting you know you can just talk. Next time you cause her attention to come off that deputy and speak to you, you are going in handcuffs. You're going to jail, okay? Am I being clear? Fair enough. Perfect. >> So, I have no first amendment right. Heard. You are interrupting with the investigation. So, when I talk to the moon If I talk to the moon, You are interrupting with the investigation. >> the moon, Okay, whatever. We're done with you. Hello, moon. You have a voluntary choice in this situation, moon. I have a first amendment. 25 ft. Get out of here. [ __ ] Really? Oh, hey. You can go ahead and get back in the vehicle. I'm in public. >> jail. Get back in the vehicle. I in public? Okay, cuz you're going to learn real quick about case law. Get back in the vehicle. >> I'm asking you. >> Get back in It doesn't matter. So, you're giving me an order. What is the justification >> You First you said 25 ft, didn't you? You said 25 ft. I'm asking you a question. Are you changing your orders? Are the laws changing all of a sudden? What is your justification to have me get back in the vehicle? I'm not doing anything. I'm recording. I'll happily leave if I legally have to. If I legally have to, I'll leave. Is this a traffic 22. Okay, so you're good. It's not a traffic stop. Okay? But you have got to stop. Stop what? Okay? Interjecting. >> I did. You have got to stop interjecting. >> Okay, so stop. Because every time you come over here and you run your mouth, okay? He's trying to conduct his investigation. You're taking her attention off of what he's doing. Are we clear? I understand, but I'm talking to the moon. Okay, and she's told you to stop, too. Okay, well, So, stop. Just stop. Fair enough. Why are you on such a trip, bro? No, it's no it's no trip. That The thing is you're not understanding. We are trying to conclude our investigation, okay? And if nothing's going on, you guys are free to go. Okay? All I did was tell her things were optional. I'm allowed to tell her that something's optional. That's all I did. I'm just standing here. I'm not trying to give you guys problems. It is now seemingly apparent that not a single deputy on scene respects the Constitution or understands the elements of obstruction. The Florida courts have ruled repeatedly that obstruction requires actual material interference, not annoyance, criticism, or disrespect. Words alone do not constitute obstruction without including threats of violence. The deputies are weaponizing a statute to silence advice unfavorable to their pursuit of a DUI. Their repeated threats of arresting B for speaking provoked his silence long enough to allow the investigating officer to convince his fiance to perform the optional field sobriety tests. And after completing them, B's fiance was placed under arrest. [Music] Can I drive her car home? I'm just asking you, can I drive her car home? All right. Of course. [ __ ] dicks. Now, after filming the scene for 35 minutes, B asks a few questions and the deputies manufacture a reason to arrest him. Do you have consent to search the vehicle? I'm not searching the vehicle, sir. Can I move the vehicle? Hey, you're not going to stand like that with your hand in your pocket. Put your hand out of your pocket. Thank you. Okay. [ __ ] high strung over here. Realizing the deputy is now barking unlawful orders to a bystander under the guise of possessing a weapon, B flipped his pockets inside out and set his headphones and other personal belongings on the ground in front of him. This was the basis the deputies used to arrest him for criminal littering. I'm doing my job, bud. Doing my job. Does it help you here? I'll empty my pockets. Yeah, stop. Just stop. It's empty. Look, boom, bro. There you go. You scared? You scared of this? Literally nothing. Empty pockets. Actually, um you got your ID on you? I don't. >> Okay. What's your name? I don't give it to you because I'm in public. I'm not going to jail because we're not a We're not a stop and identify >> Does it matter? It does. I'm not No. Guess what? You just what you're going to jail. If you refuse ID yourself, you're going to jail. That's why you got handcuffs on this B had memorized his driver's license number and recited it for the deputies after he was advised that he was under arrest. His camera was shut off as the men put him in cuffs. At his first court appearance, the littering citation was immediately dropped and replaced with an obstruction charge for not identifying. This is ridiculous for several reasons. First, the deputies documented his recited identification number on the littering citation, proving that he identified. Second, since the littering charge was bogus and likely only used to retaliate by abusing the process as a punishment for exercising his constitutional rights, then there was no lawful reason requiring B to provide his ID in the first place. The agency wanted over $8,000 to release the body cam footage and still hasn't released it to B, though he was set for a pre-trial hearing on New Year's Eve. However, a little over a week ago, B received word that the case had been dismissed and is now considering civil action against the unlawful arrest, search, and seizure of his property, malicious prosecution, and First Amendment retaliation. Let me know what you think of these three incidents. More wins are sure to come, and when they do, I'll be sure to bring the updates. [Music]