welcome back to the channel guys
i've got another soft set of raymond
hearing for you today
this one goes on a lot longer than my
previous offset arrangement hearing
video but
the ignorance on display is as always
just as prevalent
this particular software is in caught on
malicious communication charges for
repeatedly calling
local businesses utility services and
9-1-1
because he says he is sensitive to the
low-frequency humming noises they emit
his channel is full of him just
documenting these experiences but we're
here today just to concentrate on the
arraignment hearing
artist corporate fiction schrodinger's
cat and opt lawyer covered this video
about
a month ago but i forgot all about it
and
it then popped back up on my radar a
couple of days ago so i thought i would
take another look at it i will link out
his video in the description so when
you've watched this head on over and
watch artist version
right let's get into it
you don't want to be represented by an
attorney in this case
i appointed you if you would sir i
actually have a few matters i
actually may eject first of all i have a
few matters i need to address before we
move forward
um first of all sir you haven't
established the jurisdiction of the
court
okay i challenge the direction
jurisdiction of the court and
as per case law once the jurisdiction is
challenged it needs to be proved it
cannot be assumed
so i need to know which jurisdiction
this court is falling under is it
falling under the common
law or is it falling under uh maritime
admiralty law
okay sir your objection to the
jurisdictions court is noted for your
appeal which i'm sure you're going to
file
but we can't move forward sir until
we've established jurisdiction
i've just denied your objection to
appeal it's noted for the record
well then let the record state that the
court wants to move forward uh with
uh admiralty law
and applying admiralty law uh to common
law subject matter
so you can say whatever you like on the
record but the record is going to
reflect that you've made a motion to
object to the jurisdiction this court
that motion's denied
it hasn't been proved sir correct it'll
be reflected in the record for european
it needs to be proved before we could go
forward sir
it doesn't yes it does i have the uh the
case flow right here
give me one second uh i'm going to move
forward on this hearing
about you not wanting an attorney i'm
explaining that i appointed you an
attorney to protect your constitutional
right
to effective assistance and counsel yeah
this guy is getting his legal advice
from a cartoon talking frog on youtube
you might be wondering why would anyone
take legal advice from a frog
well if you're a sovereign citizen you
don't have that many options when it
comes to legal advice
there's mark stevens who schtick has a
100 percent
failure rate carl lens who has never
seen a win in his life
and then there's frog what's his success
rate
well who cares he's a frog
mr mortimer is here
sir uh i i have to object under article
1 section 8 of clause 17 of the
constitution
uh it it states that i have the right to
have the jurisdiction proven in this
court it cannot be assumed sir
this is a right that's secured by the
constitution
well at least we know he doesn't have
article one section a class 17
in front of him this is proof that he is
reading from a script he either
downloaded
or were still bought online from a
softset website
but we haven't proved jurisdiction so we
can't move forward sir
well that can be the basis for your
appeal if you'd like no appeal this
court
but i've denied your objection i've
noted it for the record it's preserved
for appeal
and that can be the basis for any appeal
that you file so now we're going to move
to the issue of your
attorney i appointed you an attorney to
to protect your right account i have to
object to that sir also
because that is actually practicing law
from the venture which is unlawful
sir you have an equal right to represent
yourself before you wave that right to
council i need to
understand that you're doing that
knowingly intelligently and voluntarily
i object sir we haven't even established
the jurisdiction of the court you're
wanting to put the card before the horse
so we cannot do that
according to the constitution article 1
section 8 clause 17
we have to establish constitution it has
to be proven without a shout out
it cannot be assumed that's what you're
arguing sir and i understand that no
this is according to the law sir
i'm denying that if i'm wrong the court
of appeals will tell me so then you're
acting as a magistrate as according
to the admiralty law am i understanding
that correctly no you're not
so so then you're under you're under
common law are you are you applying
uh is this court under common law
jurisdiction is that
is the jurisdiction of the laws of the
state of ohio
that's that's not a recognized uh
jurisdiction sir
it is no it's not according to the
constitution
there's only it can either be admiralty
law or it can be
uh common law one or the other can't be
both and it cannot be
uh anything else i mean there are some
other you've made that argument you've
also made it in writing
that's enough to present that's a
notarized uh accepted document
which is truth in fact this offset
wouldn't know true
for facts if it smacked him full on with
a shovel in his face
nota republics witnessed the signing of
a document and verified the identity of
the signer
in no way do they verify what he said in
the document is fact
he desperately needs a lawyer
unfortunately he's done in kruger levels
are way too high for him to realize it
okay i've denied your objection i'm
going to say this one more time i've
denied your objection
i understand what it is and i deny it
okay
but you don't have the authority to do
that sir because we have an established
jurisdiction
sir and so if you want to appeal on that
basis it's preserved
sir you've already acted in conflict of
any jurisdiction that this court has so
anything you do further would just be in
more violation of the law
let the records state that the judge
would like to move forward without
establishing jurisdiction and
contract contradiction to the law and uh
article 1 section 8 clause 17 of the
constitution
let the record reflect that please all
right you've made statements to the
clerk here that you don't want to be
represented by an attorney you want to
represent yourself is that true sir
sir we can't even address this issue
until we establish the jurisdiction
sir this is the jurisdiction of the
zanesville municipal court this course
that's not it's not
that's not recognized by the
constitution so i have to object okay
you've objected it's noted for the
record i need to
understand that you're doing this
knowingly intelligently and voluntarily
waving your right to counter sir i
knowingly and intelligent and brandon
don't go together in the same sentence
sir i know that i am asking you let me
object let me i know
for a fact that i am asking you to
establish jurisdiction which you have
refused he didn't refuse he has already
ruled on your jurisdiction argument
just because you don't like the answer
doesn't mean he refused
so we cannot assume the jurisdiction so
therefore um
i being a a flesh and blood man my name
being brandon
uh here on special
uh hang on give me a second here on
special appearance
uh again i'm here to challenge the
jurisdiction of the court and need to
confirm that this court
is a court of record of which
jurisdiction
whether it be admiralty or common law uh
subjects
uh excuse me quarter record subject only
to natural law not statutes codes and
regulations uh
i'm invoking all my god-given rights
secured by the constitution
i am here to rebut all presumptions this
affidavit is sworn testimony truth and
fact you're only subject to natural law
not statutes and codes and regulations
i'm afraid you don't get to decide which
laws apply to you and which ones don't
if you are in the united states you are
subject to all laws
and that includes statutes codes and
regulations uh
now with that being said sir we cannot
move forward until jurisdiction
is proven we cannot assume it just by
you telling me that that's not enough
sir we have to prove
what the jurisdiction is so either it's
admiralty law or common law one or the
other sir it can only be one of the
other
okay you have the right to buy whatever
you like and you've done that you have
the right to state whatever
objection you would like and you've done
that i've denied them
they're preserved for your appeal but i
have to object because it's unlawful sir
here's what i'm going to say i'm trying
to treat you with some respect today
and you're treating me with complete
disrespect by interrupting me
and not allowing me to move sir i'm
trying to establish my rights
you disrespect me in the middle of me
explaining to you
that this is disrespectful because i
have to object sir honestly you're out
of line sir
uh we haven't established a jurisdiction
we cannot we cannot deal with these
issues until we establish a jurisdiction
that is part of the law
i have to remind you according to the
constitution that is the law
just how cringe is this performance if
you committed your offense in the state
of ohio
the courts have jurisdiction over you
it's as simple as that
i mean do you not want to follow the
constitution sir i'm going to say this
as clearly as i can
you have made your objection you've made
your motion with regard to jurisdiction
of this court
i've denied it it's preserved for appeal
we're going to move forward we cannot
move forward sir
it is my right to object until we prove
jurisdiction
i object i'm going to explain to you
that you have the right to hire a
consultant
i object this doesn't pertain to me sir
i i am a living human being flesh and
blood and i fall under common law
jurisdiction what you are describing is
uh maritime admiralty law jurisdiction
which does not apply to living flesh and
blood man
that is how the law works sir
do you not understand this what i'm
doing here today
is trying to find out if you want to be
represented by an attorney or not
and what i'm doing here today sir is
trying to establish what the
jurisdiction is of this court we have
not established that yet
it's either admiralty law or it's common
law it's one of the other it cannot be
both i've denied your request
but you haven't answered the question i
don't have to answer any of you sure you
do sir because according to
our excuse me according to article 1
section 8 clause 17 of the constitution
it says specifically that we are
supposed to prove
jurisdiction of the court i've seen and
heard many
stupid arguments from sovereign citizens
in court over the five years i've been
monitoring them
but this guy has to be one of the most
annoying and obnoxious
the judge is handling it but he could be
a lot tougher on him
judge middleton however would know
exactly how to respond to the
jurisdiction argument
i had that discussion with a guy that
was in jail once
i said well you're in jail i guess
you're in my jurisdiction
it cannot be assumed and we cannot move
forward until
we prove the jurisdiction now here's my
concern
my concern is that you don't understand
the proceedings that you're facing here
today
well absolutely because we cannot
because i don't know which jurisdiction
you're falling under whether it be
admiralty or commentary
so that you have somebody to talk to i
objects or i don't need an attorney it
applies to the charges that have been
filed against you
they don't apply to me sir i am a flesh
and blood man under common law you are
trying to apply
magic uh maritime admiralty law sir if i
can't
understand that you understand the
proceedings against you
i'm going to be required then to have
you evaluated
so that we can find out whether you're
competent sure that is unlawful i have
to object
it's not unlawful it's necessary you are
leaving the judge with no option but to
have you evaluated due to your
bizarre behavior and willingness to move
forward
the judge has ruled on your ill-advised
jurisdiction argument
the next step for you is to appeal that
decision that's how the law works
you can object sir but this is against
my god-given rights sir
i have a few things that i need to get
through to understand that you know what
you're doing in this case i know exactly
what i'm doing sir i'm trying to
establish a jurisdiction of this court
which you are failing to do sir if you
would please please
explain to me what the jurisdiction of
the court is that's all i would like
before we can move forward
do you think i'm wrong you have the
right to appeal and i will and i will
but we cannot move forward according to
the constitution to move forward
article 1 section 8 clause 17 of the
constitution describes that we have to
prove jurisdiction if you're not willing
to do that so then we cannot move
forward and this this
i have to to submit a motion to uh
dismiss the case and avoid judgment
because without jurisdiction
there cannot be a a court you can smear
any motion that you
want you've submitted a few just minutes
prior to this hearing and i'll take a
look at those as well
i've denied the jurisdictional argument
okay you've made an objection based upon
you can't do that sir we have to prove
it
he can do that and he has and just
saying objection to his ruling doesn't
mean anything
your next move would be to appeal it and
that's what a lawyer would do
well not in this instance because a
lawyer understands what jurisdiction is
and when to challenge it all you are
doing is demonstrating your ignorance of
the law
that's your that's your opinion sir you
want to be heard on your motion and not
have an attorney
this is this is hearsay and i object uh
i object i object you can object i hear
your objection they're all preserved and
noted for your record
for your appeal i'm really really trying
to avoid having to order a competency
evaluation in this case
what i would like to know sir i am
telling you that i am brandon i
am living flesh and blood man here on
special appearance i am here to
challenge the jurisdiction of this court
and need to confirm the jurisdiction of
this court whether it is admiralty law
or common law in which
jurisdiction it falls under in which
jurisdiction the
subject matter is pertaining to it
appears to me sir that you're
complaining or this court is conflating
the two jurisdictions and trying to
apply
admiralty law
sanctions and imposing them on common
law subject matter
it doesn't work that way sir maybe the
judge should just pop a kermit costume
on
because that's the only way he will get
through to this guy
failing that he should just do as he
says and order a competency evaluation
but he should also be held in contempt
for interrupting the judge
they're not interchangeable it's one of
the other living flesh and blood man
does not fall under
admiralty law and cannot then those
those
rules and statutes cannot be applied
across to the other jurisdiction it
doesn't work that way sir we have to
establish a jurisdiction whether this
court is under
admiralty law or common law
and until we establish that we can't
move forward if you want to
if you want to confirm that this court
is
is following the jurisdiction of common
law then we can move forward because i'm
a living flesh and blood man and i fall
under that jurisdiction
uh but if it's contrary to that subject
matter
or excuse me that jurisdiction rather
then
i have to uh make a motion or ask for a
motion to dismiss the cases avoid
judgment because we have an established
jurisdiction
please tell me how can you file a motion
to dismiss the case as a void judgment
when
one you don't believe the judge has
jurisdiction to dismiss it
and two there hasn't been a judgment to
avoid
because you are only at the arraignment
stage
i also want to i also want to make the
point sir that uh there's been several
actions by this court
prior to having uh jurisdiction
established
uh sanctions that have been placed on me
the living flesh and blood man that are
unlawful uh and were unlawful at the
time they were placed
uh because the uh jurisdictions are
being conflated
uh it's as simple as that sir
um so i would like you to just please
confirm for me are
we under the jurisdiction of the common
law or
admiralty law
sir are you refusing to move forward
with the hearing regarding your waiver
right to counsel
sir uh acquiescence by silence is tested
admission
and silence is consent silence should
never
mean consent i've said this before in a
video
but they keep repeating it so i need to
keep saying it
so if you're gonna not answer the
question
and establish the jurisdiction or prove
it rather
then we can't move forward because
jurisdiction has to be established
before
we can move forward with any suit
whatsoever in any court
are you refusing to move forward with
this hearing today
sir i object to what you're saying until
we establish the jurisdiction of the
court we can't before with anything
say yes no i object so you want to go
forward
i object i object this is your objection
i'm asking you if you want to go forward
sir that doesn't make any difference to
me
until we establish jurisdiction that is
a moot point
you should understand this sir i hope
that you do
i am trying to be respectful but i'm
being drug into this courtroom and
having to answer
uh answering for crimes which i didn't
commit and there's jurisdictions that
are being conflated so i'm trying to
understand
the jurisdiction of this court because
you're trying to operate from two
different jurisdictions
and that's unlawful sir so unless you
want to establish which jurisdiction
you're operating from whether it be
admiralty law or common law
then we're gonna have to uh i'm gonna
have to ask for another motion to
dismiss this case as avoid judgment
because until uh until
jurisdiction is established we can't
move forward and if there's no
jurisdiction then there is no court case
like i've already said this is your
raymond hearing
so there hasn't been a judgment yet so
how can your judgment be void
and nowhere in the constitution does it
say there is only maritime admiralty
and common law jurisdiction you've just
been deceived by a cartoon talking frog
well let's see uh says right here no
sanction can be imposed
absent proof of jurisdiction once
challenged jurisdiction cannot be
assumed
it must be proven to exist that comes
from standard versus olson745.ct.768.
also here i have where a judicial
tribunal has no jurisdiction of the
subject matter on which it assumes to
act
its proceedings are absolutely void in
the fullest sense of the term
that's dylan versus dylan uh 187
page 27. municipal court it was
established under the statute of the
ohio revised code
we handled misdemeanor crimes that
happen within the city of zanesville
okay so that that does not answer the
question i have to object
it's my answer to your question that
doesn't answer the question though sir
that's acquiescence
your answer my question is obviously
you're not going to go forward
we can't we can't by law sir sir i'm
afraid that i can't address your request
to be um to represent yourself unless i
know you're waiving your right to
counsel which is your constitutional
right to effective assistance counsel
and you're doing that knowingly
intelligently and voluntarily
sure if i can't establish that i object
i have no
choice but to order that i object you
you don't want to establish it sir
understand
what you're doing so as a partner i
object i'm modifying i'm ordering
that you have a concept i object or you
don't have the authority to do that
under the constitution under i'm
ordering that you undergo under article
1
section 8 clause 17 of the constitution
we cannot move forward and this is an
unlawful
court hearing i'm modifying your bond
to continue all other conditions that
have been previously said including your
firearms are going to remain
uh surrendered i object good call by the
judge
but he should have done this like 15
minutes ago
sir this is unlawful as per the uh the
emotion that i had uh
submitted to the court prior to the
hearing today i'll address that motion
a couple minutes before our hearing and
i'll address it in writing it was
accepted by the clerk sir
yeah which is their job it doesn't mean
what is in those filings is correct
or fact okay you're right it was fine
and i'm going to order as a part of your
bond that you comply
with my order to complete a competency
evaluation it's unlawful sir object
all right you can object but right now
that's the order of the court
so this year that doesn't pertain to me
sir so we until we establish
jurisdiction we don't know what this is
the subject matter or excuse we don't
know what the jurisdiction of the
subject matter is
you haven't if you haven't established a
jurisdiction sir
do you have an established jurisdiction
okay your objections
i will continue to monitor this channel
and look for any updates
to this case and i will post them either
in the description
community page or future uploads uh
thank you so much for watching i really
do appreciate it please like share and
subscribe if you enjoyed this kind of
video
if you want to support me further and
get early access to my videos you can do
this by checking out my patreon
take care and i'll catch you in the next
one
you