Transcript Details
Back to Video Edit
Language
en
Format
text
Source
scrappa
Auto-generated
Yes
Confidence
N/A
Created
2026-10-22 12:04
Transcript Content
When [clears throat] I see videos like this, sometimes I got to pinch myself. I have no idea what freaking planet I'm on. All right, let's start from scratch. The US Attorney General is often referred to as America's top cop. Today, the US AG is Todd Blanch. Under the US Attorney General is another top US law enforcement official. That's the director of the FBI, Cash Patel. And since a stream can rise no higher than its source, you need to see this video because the source of American law enforcement is no longer disqualifying FBI agents within their ranks who have been involved in real criminality and perversion, choosing to view them as victims of crimes rather than the actual criminals themselves. You only thought you knew how vile, corrupt, and perverted these people were, but we really have no idea how bad it really is. Patel's admission pulls back the veil just a little bit. And guys, hold on to your hats cuz this gets real disgusting real quick during this dog and pony judiciary committee hearing. If you want to turn back now and click off of this video, I would not blame you because this gets really disgusting and unbelievable. It's almost like we're on the set of the Twilight Zone and our feet are planted firmly in Idiocracy. And remember, this is all a circus sideshow under the big top. The Democrats hate you. The Republicans hate you. They're all in the big club and you aren't. Let's take a look at this. June, the FBI has lowered its hiring standards by dropping automatic disqualification for applic memo issued this June, the FBI has lowered its hiring standards by dropping automatic disqualification for applicants who have stolen from fire employees, paid for sex, are engaged in beastiality. In July, you claim the FBI is quote losing too many qualified candidates to the rigors of requirements from yestery year. Director Patel, do you believe those who have previously stolen from employee employers, solicited sex, or engaged in BCL are qualified candidates that the FBI is losing? >> Thank you for bringing this up so we can get to the truth of the matter. What we did was we did not want to punish victims of beastiality. [laughter] victims who were trafficked. We did want not want to make it an automatic disqualification for the FBI to consider you if you are a victim of these awful, heinous acts. They still have to go to the same rigorous standards and application process. >> Let let me just just think about it for a second. Who is the victim in a beastiality scenario? It's not the human being. It's the animal. What is he saying here? And on your other note regarding our standards, our standards have never been higher. We've just hired on 307 former law enforcement and military officers. We've just hired on 470 individuals who have advanced degrees and we've just hired on 448 individuals who are fluent in multiple foreign languages. So we have >> former former military officers. So, just really, really good order followers who do what they're told regardless of what is right instead of doing what is right regardless of what they're told. Okay, gotcha, Cash. Okay, let's get on to this beastiality thing. >> Changed the standards. We are not going to target victims and prevent them from serving in their capacity to serve this country who may be most motivated to serve FBI workforce. >> He's no longer protecting those who have been charged with beiality. He's protecting those who are victims. just turned it upside down. No, >> I caught that. No, >> you actually did because you lied. >> No, >> Durban is a Democrat buffoon, but he's absolutely right right here. And and stay tuned because a Republican is going to grill Cash Patel here in a minute. >> I can just tell you what I'm reading to you is you dropped automatic disqualification for applicants who have been engaged in beastiality. Not victims of beastiality, applicants who have engaged. There were certain things >> that disqualified you from being an FBI agent >> and you not you but the the agency said u we're no longer going to allow these things this behavior to disqualify you. What were what were the things you changed? simply that if you were a victim of some of these vicious crimes and you wanted to serve this country, the FBI is now for the first time ever considering your application and not disqualifying. >> Victim of what? Give me the >> prostitution, beastiality, crimes like that, traffic. How do you even put that on your list? How do you as a serious person who cares about morality, cares about doing the right thing, cares about hiring quality employees to do a quality job? And I'm not saying the FBI is a quality organization doing a quality job because we know that it showed itself to be an organized crime ring, a corrupt crime ring in America doing some great disservice to Americans under the color of law enforcement, under the color of the drug law, under the color of gun laws, specifically with the ATF. This guy is off the chain ridiculous. I mean, you pretty much can't get more corrupt than this. You have the FBI director, former deputy FBI director Dan Bongino, former Attorney General Pam Bondi, now current attorney general Todd Blanch. They're still all covering and and holding tight whatever's left of the Epstein files. They have not prosecuted one single guilty person in that list. And this acceptance of people who've engaged in beastiality is just the icing on a corrupt poop fil cake. >> So if you were It's not if you if you frequented a prostitute, it's if you were a prostitute. >> If you were Yes. the victim. Forced into it. [laughter] >> Okay. Um, what >> what what about the beastiality? >> Same thing. Because the rags wrote it up in a fashion before I arrived that address prostitution, beastiality, and trafficking. They were there before I got there. They >> But tell tell me what it said before. >> It it automatically disqualified any individual who participated on either side of it. That seems participate. Wait. participated on either side of it. On one side is a human being. On the other side is an animal. What are you saying that you would actually consider hiring the animal even if they've engaged in beastiality? What's going on here? >> Obviously, we are never going to hire the criminal >> side of what the beastiality. >> Yes. >> So, you disqualified the animal. [laughter] [clears throat] >> Well, I don't think we we have great canines, but we're not going to disqualify >> I understand. He said on either side of it and I think he meant that. >> Understand why you did this. Have you This is not directed at you, Mr. Director. And And I I I understand the game. People try to make you look bad. >> That's what this is. This is a game to them. They are in the big club. You and I aren't in the big club. This is how perverted they are. No matter how conspiracy-minded and paranoid you might be, what the government has done and is doing and how corrupt they are is worse than you can possibly imagine. >> Uh we do the same thing when when the other parties in office and all this stuff has really hurt the FBI. It's really hurt the FBI. Can you imagine what Republicans would be saying right now if Joe Biden's FBI engaged in this kind of cont conduct and lowered the bar to this kind of level? I mean, this is in the dirt. So, I'm trying to get to the bottom of this. Why would you why would you in light of the of the context and and what we're going through and we're having a tough time attracting agents good quality agents we all can trust because so many people fairly or unfairly think that to order to be an FBI FBI agent now you your political point of view matters. Why would you even get into beastiality? >> We We are not into beastiality, but a lot of these individuals >> I know you're not. >> You're totally into it. What are you talking about? That you drugged this thing on the table or this was a carryover from former policies. You were totally into it. >> But you changed you you you changed >> But I'm trying to explain it. Hang on. >> You changed the qualifications and mentioned beastiality. If if Joe if Joe participated in beastiality, >> not as the animal, but as the human, >> don't you think he ought to be qualified, disqualified? >> If he voluntarily did it, sure. But if he was trafficked into it, >> okay, how do you involuntarily do it? In a lot of these cases, when human traffickers, who are some of the worst individuals on planet Earth, they don't just traffic you for prostitution, they traffic you for degrading acts of all kind, and they force you into that type of conduct. And some of these individuals would go on to be law enforcement officers who qualified to be law enforcement officers and later applied to the FBI. >> I mean, wait a second. So, they've been involved in this. This is what's what's wrong with them. Why would you ever consider hiring somebody that even if they were a victim, even if they were forced into it, they're going to have some psychological issues you're not going to want to deal with when they have a uniform and a badge and a utility belt and the authority of the state. You want to hire people who are moral. You want to hire people who are stable, who don't have these PTSDs going on in their heads. That's why it's not a good idea to hire former military as law enforcement officers on American soil because now they think American soil is the battlefield, not just Iran and Iraq. Now they can have those same actions because they're just order followers. They're just doing what they're told regardless of what is right. You don't want somebody suffering from PTSD. No matter what they're suffering from PTSD from, you don't want them to have authority. you. It seems like you would want the most consistently moral and ethical human being who's not dealing with all of this mental baggage. This makes absolutely no sense unless there's a plan. Unless they intend to put these people in positions of authority because they know exactly what it means. It means a reduction in American freedoms. It means a trampling of unalienable rights. It means a very easy individual to control because we got something on you. We got the dirt on you and you don't want that cat let out of the bag. So, you better do what you're told. >> This didn't initi this these changes didn't start with you, did they? Somebody came to you and recommended. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. And when you saw beastiality, I say this with respect, the person who recommended it, why didn't you just say, "What planet did you parachute in from? Why do why do I want to leave?" >> That was my initial response. >> Why do I want to leave with my chin and get into beastiality? >> That was my initial response, Senator. But they then explained to me and showed me cases in which people were forced into it and had applied to the FBI. And so I thought they should be considered. It's not an automatic disqualification. That's all. >> Okay. All right. I think I understand. But you're not telling us today that if a human being >> No. >> had sex with an animal that they can still be an FBI agent. >> No. >> Are you? >> No. >> They can't be, can they? >> They cannot. >> In fact, they ought to be in jail, right? >> They all are. >> Yeah. Well, okay. Unless they're former cops. He just said basically former cops have been involved in this kind of thing and now they're applying for the FBI and they shouldn't be rejected because of their beastiality past. >> And they force you into that type of conduct. And some of these individuals would go on to be law enforcement officers who qualified to be law enforcement officers and later applied to the FBI. >> This is 100% A1 bonkers, off thecharts, whatever you want to call it. It is insane that this guy would even consider somebody who's been a victim of beastiality while he operates as one of America's top cops should tell you everything you need to know about the mentality of these people who want authority over other people. Please leave your thoughts about this in the comment section below. I really want to hear what you have to say about this. None of us is greater than all of us. Maybe I'm missing something here. Do you think that somebody who was engaged in that kind of activity, even if they were forced into it, should be given a badge, a uniform, and the authority of the state? Don't we have enough problems in this world? If you like this video and you want to support this channel, you can do it for free. Just like this video, share this video, subscribe to the channel, hit the bell notification icon, and if I don't lose my mind, I will see you in the next video. >> [bell]
Danger Zone

This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.