Do judges really decide your fate before you walk into the courtroom? So, what are we talking about here? We're talking about the personal biases and prejudices of a judge. Judges can be biased toward the state because they sit in a position of authority and judgment for many, many years. It feels like everybody that comes before you is guilty of something before any piece of evidence has ever been established. Are they supposed to prejudge you? Of course not. Judges are supposed to be neutral and determine guilt after the production of evidence. So, it would be improper for a judge to make conclusions about you or your case before any evidence was presented. So, surely they would never do that, right? Comment below. Tell me if you've got a personal experience where a judge has done that or if you think judges do it.