Hey, welcome back to the Here's the Deal channel. Thank you for taking your time to join me. We are told constantly that all that is needed for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing. But what if the people who are perceived as being good, like the cops, are doing really bad things in the name of law and order? Cuz we're always hearing about this law and order that we need to institute on the land because if we did that, it would make things a whole lot better. But what if these good cops, these good people that everybody perceives to be good, what if they do these bad things to innocent people that they're supposed to be protecting and serving? And what if they do it with the approval and the applause of the indoctrinated masses? We're going to take a look at this today. I'm going to follow up with the DoorDasher who got his rights violated from yesterday's video, and I told you I would do this follow-up about the initial video where the Dayton, Ohio Police Department were just trolling, didn't have anything better to do. And because, you know, there's no crime in Dayton, so they got to create crime by pulling somebody over with a license plate cover who's actually providing a service to his community by DoorDashing. We're going to take a look at this, and I want to pay specific attention to what the offending officer says. Check this out. >> Damn, look at him. What's up, bro? Bro, I'm DoorDashing, bro. What you want? >> Talking to you through the point camera. >> You boring as [ __ ] >> I'm not at this service. I'm on the 131 South. >> Excuse me. >> I'm talking to you. Hey, stop. >> Bro, I'm working. You You ain't stopped me. You ain't pulled me over. Your lights ain't on. You ain't pulled me over. >> matter. I'm telling you right now I'm stopping you. >> pull me over. >> It doesn't matter. >> Turn your lights on, then. >> I don't have to. I'm telling you right now >> cam on? Yeah. >> Where? >> It's recording. >> Yeah, all right. So, what do you want? You want to write me a ticket? Write me a ticket. >> Stop. Stop. >> What? >> I'm going to tell you right now. I'm getting your information. >> Okay, I'm getting my ID. So, back up so I can get my ID. >> Well, first of all, I'm going to take that gun off your waist. >> You have no reason to disarm >> Dude, >> Now, this is scary right here. Let me back this up so we can look at the reflection here. Watch this. >> So, back up so I can get my ID. >> Well, first of all, I'm going to take that gun off your waist. You have no reason to >> Look at this. Okay, check out this image right here. How scary is it that a lame brain, low IQ, zero morality cop is going to disarm you and keep you from It separate you from your personal protection devices. How many times have we seen cops try to safely disarm a {quote} {unquote} citizen and end up pulling the trigger and shooting that citizen in the leg or offing them? How many times do we have to see this? This is actually a very scary scenario because you thought you were safe. And he's not being pulled over because he's committed a crime. He hasn't And I know I say this all the time. I hope it's not getting old for people, but he hasn't harmed anybody. He's not suspected of harming anybody. He hasn't threatened anybody. He hasn't damaged property. He's not a thief. He hasn't stolen property. And yet they pull him over anyway. And now they're going to grab his gun out of his waistband. And I'm going to show you here in a second how he carries because he shows it in a follow-up video. This is dangerous. You can lose your life as you're being disarmed by a roadside tyrant. >> Dude, >> You have no reason You have no reason >> I'm taking it off of you. >> You have no reason to disarm >> Yes, I do. >> No, you don't. >> I'm talking to you. >> All right, brother. >> Exactly right. He does not have a reason to disarm him. >> Go ahead. Watch. I'm about to sue the [ __ ] out of y'all. >> By the way, if you send super chats, I guarantee you at the end of of video, I will read out every single super chat. So, thank you for contributing to the to the cause. Thank you for supporting the channel, Patreon members, cash app, buy me a coffee, the super chats, the super stickers. I really appreciate it. I will be reading those out at the end. >> I am. I don't consent to no searches or seizures. >> He's making it very clear. Good for him. >> You good? Can I Can I get my ID now? >> Just tell me your name. >> Can I get my ID? You know who I am. I'm pretty sure you know who I am. Every- Yo, everybody know who I am. You got me out here on camera looking like a [ __ ] [ __ ] >> I DO? >> YOU'RE A COP IN DAYTON, aren't you? >> I've never seen you in my life. >> bro. This [ __ ] ridiculous. >> What's your name? >> I'm out here Door Dashing. You about to get it, bro. >> Hey, man. >> What's your name? >> Hey, man. >> [ __ ] Dude, the cop >> I mean, all I can say positive about this cop right here is he doesn't have sleeve tattoos yet. But, I can almost guarantee you that he will succumb to the peer peer pressure, and he will soon get those sleeve tattoos. But, he should probably be drug tested. >> I'm an idiot. Crazy as [ __ ] >> Here's the deal. Just stay here for me. I'm going to check your license. >> Here's the deal. You about to find nothing. Waste of your time. Go ahead. [ __ ] [ __ ] Bro, what? On God. >> Hey, check this out. Check this out. Want to hear something crazy? That's illegal. >> Ooh, it's a It's a high hour ticket, man. Write the ticket, bro. Man, write the ticket, bro. Cuz you want to keep playing, bro. Write the ticket, bro. >> All right, that's what I wanted to point out right there. This individual wants to justify his existence as a police officer. Hey, you want to see something? You want to see something? Check this out. That's illegal. Our pol- our political parasites, the parasitic class, the politician class has told us that we can pull you over. We can legally commit atrocities against you because our politi- our politicians say we can. So, there's this political class and this law enforcement class. And the political class tells the law enforcement class what to do, how high to jump, and the law enforcement class says, "Yes, sir. We will absolutely comply with that because we are we are state-funded, revenue-generating agents who don't give a damn about your rights, don't give a damn about any of your rights, any of your freedoms. We are going to steamroll over those rights. And check this out. You want to see something awesome? This guy, he's rolling dirty. He's got an illegal license plate cover on him. Watch Watch how proud he is. Watch how sure he is that he's doing the right thing. This is the scary thing because these cops truly believe they are doing the right thing. They truly believe they are serving the public. They are protecting the community by harassing a person who's actually providing a valuable service, DoorDash, because people want it. This is engaging in the free market. They're interfering in the free market, but they think they're just in doing that because their activities are legal. Watch this again. >> Wait, I'm God. >> This is very very important because this underpins the mentality of every single law enforcer. >> Hey, check this out. Check this out. Want to hear something crazy? That's illegal. Ooh, it's a it's a $100 ticket, man. Write the ticket, bro. Man, write the ticket, bro. Cuz you want to keep playing, bro. Write the ticket, bro. >> God. >> Oh yeah, we getting good views, man. Good views. Wasting my time, bro. Can I finish delivering my order right here while you got me waiting? The [ __ ] Man, this [ __ ] weird, bro. I don't even want to go in my car cuz this [ __ ] might do some weird [ __ ] >> And that's just that's just the crack in the door, guys. Pulling somebody over for a license plate cover, for not activating your turn signal when they say you should or the the dim license plate light or you hit the fog line, anything. That's why traffic law sucks. That's why traffic law practically speaking trumps unalienable rights. That your your unalienable rights are invisible as long as traffic law is on their table. That's all they can see and they believe that they're the good guys by enforcing it. >> Yeah, don't. Shut the [ __ ] up, bro. This dude >> [laughter] >> Truly makes you want to pull your hair out. >> [ __ ] funny. It's the light. It's the feds, bro. Bro, it's crazy [ __ ] He really made the light, jumped in front of cars, trying to run down the street when I'm halfway two blocks down the street to catch up to me. >> What's interesting is that on an alternate video, this guy I'm so glad that he has a front-facing and rear-facing dash cam because it shows the cop following him the entire way, him obeying all the traffic laws, and the cop is just wasting his time, taxpayer's time, manpower to pursue somebody who's not involved in a crime when they could be actually solving a crime, murders, rapes, real theft. >> But he don't know who I am. But yeah, he took he took [ __ ] three blocks to jump up on me. Come on. >> Mhm. >> Bro, come on, man. >> I wish I had that video pulled up. We could fast forward through it. >> It's all right. I need a content anyway, gang. I've been bored, bro. I'm sorry. Bro, I'm trying to get you your order, gang. Bro. >> So now these people are waiting for their food and he can't give them their food. I personally, I would just open my back door and give them the food, but the problem is if you open your back door to get that food so you can deliver it to your customer who's waiting, they could construe that as you getting another weapon and you could be soon filled with holes and bleeding out in the middle of the street. >> You got to be very careful how you act and the movements you make in the presence of a police officer. >> UPS I don't care, bro. >> This goes on every day thousands of times in America. >> Look at the whole neighborhood out here looking at me like I'm stupid, bro. >> [laughter] >> Over what? >> And they'll do that. People in the neighborhood will look at you like, "Whoa, what did this guy do? He must be a criminal." Even though the real criminal has a badge, uniform, and a gun. >> I'm a sergeant. All right. Sorry to know if you >> Quite all right. >> This guy's a sergeant. >> Yes, >> These These guys just couldn't do anything else in life. Nothing else productive. They have no other skills. They They're basically entitlement queens. They're subsidy queens. They make money through the extortion of the tax cattle. That's how they get their paycheck. Their paycheck is derived from mass state-funded violence and theft. They don't have any other skills. They can't build a house. They can't like, you know, form concrete. They can't fix any plumbing. They're just out there harassing and collecting from the rest of us in the name of the protection and service racket. This is a sergeant on the scene now. Will he correct this officer and say, "Hey, do you have probable cause that this guy committed a crime?" Or is he going to actually back the blue and reinforce the corporate traffic laws? >> Even though he didn't pull me over, I was already parked. I mean, I guess so. But, it makes I was already parked and I was DoorDash and when he stopped and then he waited for me to get done with my DoorDash order. I got it on camera. He waited for me to get done with my DoorDash order and then stayed here and waited the entire time. >> Look Look how much time I'm I'm just I'm not going to pause the video. I'll just turn it down. Look how much time they waste. They waste their own time, their own manpower. Each of these guys is probably getting paid $25, $30 an hour. Plus, they're wasting the time of the DoorDash driver while food is getting cold. >> So, how can I be pulled over with no emergency lights on? No, ask the sergeant. Can I ask you that? >> Yeah, it's not necessary to always have the lights on. >> Okay. For a traffic stop though, you don't have to have to turn lights on for a traffic stop? >> Did he inform you that you weren't free to go? >> He did not Not until I came back after I dropped my order off. No, you did not inform me I was not free to go. It's on camera, bro. It's on camera. >> He's stopping you. What's the chance that he's legally stopping you? >> I He didn't have a reason though until I said something to him. >> You know, I To me, when I hear somebody say, "Well, it's legal." The word that I hear is criminal. He's criminally stopping you. He doesn't have to have his lights on. Plus, look at this cop. He's sitting in the middle of the street. Nobody can get by him. If you sat in the middle of the street without your hazards on, let's say your vehicle broke down and you don't have your hazards on, you'll probably get a ticket. But, he's not broken down. He has voluntarily elected to sit in the street without his hazards on. What if somebody comes around a corner and hits the guy cuz he he doesn't see him? He'd be responsible for that accident, but he's got qualified qualified immunity, so nothing's going to happen to him. >> You said that after I said something to you, Mike. Okay. All right, bro. >> Truly infuriating. >> trying to argue. I'm just talking to you, having a conversation, sir. I You You ain't having me no issues. He just He rubbed me the wrong way because of the way he had his attitude for no reason. >> And they disarmed me for no reason. >> Yeah. >> So you know that, too. I had my firearm on me. He disarmed me. I told him I ain't got to sit there and search or seizure, and he took it. >> You said you had a firearm on you. >> And what I I did I touch it? Did I reach for it? Were my arms in dangerous? Am I Do you think I'm armed and dangerous though? Do you know what that means? >> But am I armed and dangerous? Do you know what those two go together is? >> I love this cuz you have an attitude. Well, if based on attitude somebody should be disarmed, then based on the bad attitudes of the cops, the tyrannical attitudes, the oppressive attitude of the cops, then they should all be disarmed. But at this point, the commanding officer, the sergeant who's arrived on the scene, should look over at this cop who made the stop and said, Wait a second. Dude, there's a supreme law of the land. It's the Second Amendment, right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. If you took his firearm and he didn't commit a crime and you don't suspect that he committed a crime, you've actually stepped in the way of his rights. You've become an infringer. Did you really do that? They're not going to do that cuz they're too interested in backing the blue instead of supporting freedom. >> That's not dangerous. That's not dangerous, buddy. >> This is pitiful. This sucks. As we record this video, this is happening in thousands of instances all across America. >> I don't got one. Can I go deliver my DoorDash order? He's making me wait. He's making me late. It's going to go against me. >> Stand where you are. The sergeant should be like, yeah. Can you just lift up your shirt? I mean, you got any other weapons on you? Heck yeah, go fulfill your order. We don't want you to be We don't want your job to be jeopardized. No. Stand where you are. Stay where you are. >> All I have to do is go to that house and hit complete order. That's it. It's going against me for being late right now, and I'm trying to just deliver the order. I literally walked up there. I came back to get the food, and he stopped me. And don't y'all have a printer? Can't this hurry up? >> Just prolonging the detention. >> This is crazy, bro. >> [sighs] >> How does it take this long to issue a ticket? Isn't this a violation of Rodriguez? Rodriguez v. US Think about it. We pay our oppressors to economically terrorize us. How messed up is that? >> This is crazy, bro. >> I'm going to turn this down. Can you imagine having a job where you get paid just to stand around and do nothing? Or you get paid to stand around while your buddies are harming other people and extracting money from them, shaking them down? This is This is a theft ring. This is a nationwide theft ring. It happens in police departments, sheriff's departments. Just prolonging this dang detention. I will definitely address and uh read out all the super chats at the end of this video, guys. Thank you very much. All right, we're going to fast forward this. >> And how long you been out here? 15 minutes now, it feel like. [ __ ] >> This video's been running for 9, so they've been out here about 10 minutes. >> I'm two. 250113, the same [ __ ] ass car I caught outside my house at one time, too. >> By the way, this DoorDash driver, while they're writing this ticket, we're going to see in the next video how he carries and uh some of what he says, he aspired when he was a young kid to become a Dayton police officer. And the reason he's not one today is because of the Dayton Police Department and constantly being harassed, no matter what car he drove, no matter what friends he was with, no matter what location he found himself at, he was constantly being harassed and detained by the Dayton Police Department. >> They're trying to run my damn gun. >> Man, if they're running the gun, if they're running the gun and they put you in the system, this is why you want to protect your ID. You do not want to be placed into a police database ba- database because they can put whatever note they want to right next to your name. Here we go. >> All right. So, uh you can pay this online. You don't have to appear in court or anything. But, if you do want to go to court and challenge it, it's going to be on the 20th of this month at 8:30 a.m. at the Dayton court, 301 West 3rd Street. If you want to pay it online, it won't it probably won't be ready until like maybe Tuesday or Wednesday next week. So, you just go to paymyfine.org and you pay it there. >> They act all nice to you as they're giving you the bill of tyranny. >> Um That's about it. So, do you have any questions for me? >> Do you feel accomplished? >> What's up? >> Do you feel accomplished? >> Ooh. I'm just doing my job, man. Come on, brother. You know you know there's way worse [ __ ] you could worry about. >> And then uh is it okay if I open your door and accept this in your passenger seat? Let me guess I >> That is so so true, man. He hit the nail on the head right there. Do you feel accomplished? Are you accomplishing what you feel like you need to accomplish right here in America, right here in Ohio to make the world a better place? Do you feel like you're you're stamping out criminality? Are you just working as a little Indian for your political parasitic chiefs? Love what this guy just said right here. >> Listen again. >> for me? >> Do you feel accomplished? >> What's up? >> Do you feel accomplished? >> I'm just doing my job, man. Come on, brother. You know you know there's way worse [ __ ] you could worry about. >> And then uh is it okay if I open your door and accept this in your passenger seat? Let me sign it right here. >> [laughter] >> All right, man. Just don't grab it until I leave. Okay? >> Got it. All right. You're good. All right, brother. Go ahead. >> I don't even know. I cannot comprehend how you can get back in your patrol cruiser and at the end of your shift go home, kiss your wife, hug your kids, have dinner, and go to sleep with a clear conscience. You have to be so immersed in cognitive dissonance. It has to be so powerfully working in you that you're you just you have no conscience. You literally when you when you put on the uniform, you have to hang up your conscience if there's any conscience left because a man of conscience and more morality and a man who abides by principles, any semblance of principles could not do this to another individual. And even if there was a law that the politicians gave you, you would look at it and you'd be like, that's stupid. I'm not going to I'm going to set my sights on making sure that there's no real crime in our neighborhood. I'm going to make sure that any thief that I can apprehend is apprehended. Any murderer is you know, apprehended and taken to jail. Any rapist because I'm not going to spend my time nitpicking and pathetically economically terrorizing my fellow Americans. Not going to do it. And yet, that's not where they are. And there are over 900,000, almost a million law enforcement agents outside of the military. We're talking about deputies. We're talking about sheriffs. We're talking about police chiefs. We're talking about just regular detectives and just regular police officers, on the beat police officers. There's about 900, 950, almost a million of them. 1 million law enforcement agents who if they didn't do what they've been doing, we could be way, way more free than we actually are right now. This is what they spend their time to doing. To the point where it's so bad that 6.2 to 6.8 billion with a B, 6.2 to 6.8 billion dollars every single year is generated just off of speeding tickets alone. And my wager is most of those tickets that are issued are based on bold-faced lies. Period. We see how many times they lie about speeding. We saw that thing that audit the audit did years ago. Remember Miss Maddie, the blonde-headed chick who had the sunglasses on, whose husband was a um you know, auto sales guy, and she was testing out one of the vehicles, clearly had her seatbelt on. Thank goodness she had an in da- in in a cab dashcam, and the motorcycle cop turned around and said, "I'm giving you a ticket for seatbelt." And he didn't end up giving her a ticket because she pointed up at her dashcam, and he realized he'd been caught. How many people every single day in America are being economically terrorized but the because the cop lied in the report and said she wasn't or he wasn't wearing a seatbelt when you know dang well you were. And besides that, why are you issuing a ticket for seatbelts? If you're not free in America to live on the edge, live recklessly, live without a seatbelt, then you're not free in America. This isn't the land and can't be the land of the free. That's just one example. 6.2 to 6.8 billion just in speeding tickets. Doesn't count all the other tickets. It doesn't count all the drug laws. They rake in un- unimaginable sums of money. Remember Steven Lara who was trying to make his way from Texas to California to visit his daughters. He had his life savings of $86,000 in the trunk, and the Nevada Highway Patrol pulled him over and commended him for his driving. Just said you were following a little bit too close when he actually wasn't following too close. They pulled him over anyway, and they stole all his cash, and if it wasn't for the Institute of Justice, he never would have got that cash back. So so this 6.2 to 6.8 billion dollars in speeding tickets doesn't even account for civil asset forfeiture. You know, cuz they got to do that because they got to protect Americans from the Mexican drug cartels. Just infuriating. It makes you want to just really rip your hair out of your skull. >> Bro, I swear to God, you can't be more bored than that, bro. I swear to God, bro. >> It's true. Yep. >> I swear I'm going He's talking about if you ain't got to go to court if you want to just pay it online. [ __ ] I'm going to court. [ __ ] you talking about? Bro, this [ __ ] act like I ain't got full 360 camera in my [ __ ] that's about to have everything on camera, [ __ ] Like, come on, bro. Oh God, yeah. Like, bro, this [ __ ] act like they got no lights on. Need them [ __ ] or ain't It ain't no traffic stop without them, bro. Dead ass, bro. I tried to He grabbed me. You see me? Here you go, brother. It's still warming everything, man. >> All right. So, now he delivers his um his Uber Eats or DoorDash or whatever it was. But, this is the guy right here. The name of his channel is Shots by Zai. I guess he It's a like a car channel. But, this is a a still of his video where he shows that at one time all of his youthful life he aspired to be a police officer with the Dayton Dayton, Ohio Police Department. Sorry, Dayton, Ohio Police Department. And the reason he's not today is because of the Dayton, Ohio Police Department messing with him. Let me Let me show you. I think he I think he shows his He picks up his shirt and he shows that he the way he carries. He says he carries all the time and it's basically appendix carry. Let me see. >> Open carrying. I mean, y'all probably see cuz I did file a FOIA request, but I was actually wearing some sweatpants, which hold on. I'm going to see if I can show y'all cuz like right now I ain't I ain't got a belt on, but as y'all can see, with no belt on, it like weighs the holster weighs it down right there. So, when I'm sitting there and I was probably recording because I'm left-handed, you feel me? So, I'm sitting there recording like this and I'm holding it high. So, he probably seen when I walked >> So, look, he's got appendix carry. So, when a cop says, "Hey, I'm going to disarm you." and he grabs that gun out of your waist, he could literally shoot your junk off. And I I should have pulled up the video. Remember that uh it was I think it was a traffic stop and the female cop disarmed the man and ended up shooting him in the leg. You can lose a leg over that. You can lose your junk over that. You can lose your life over that. And there's no reason for them to have disarmed this guy. This is the supposed to be the land of the free, home of the brave, governed by the supreme law of the land, second amendment, right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. And yet, they become the very infringers they promised Americans that they wouldn't be, that they would defend us from. So, he could have easily easily lost his life. So, here you are carrying a a firearm because you want to protect yourself and your loved ones in case things go down, and you want to protect everybody in your zone of influence, and now here comes a protector who who's doing the opposite of protecting you. Now, they're putting your life on the chopping block because they're scared because you have a weapon and you might use it because they're terrorizing you. And that's what a lot of people are doing. Not I don't know about a lot, but we're seeing it more and more. People are getting just fed up with getting messed with by the protectors and servants, and they're taking matters into their own hands. So, that is Shots by Zai, and this was his traffic stop. And I want to know from you guys, have you ever been pulled over by a law enforcement agent for something stupid like your the window tinting's too dark, or you have a license plate cover and you shouldn't have it, or you you changed lanes too quickly and you didn't activate your turning signal. And when they did that, did they further violate your rights and economically terrorize you during that stop? Let me know in the comments section below because this kind of stuff right here, people think that this this kind of a stop is no big deal. But when the cop displays what he really feels about how seriously he takes the psychopathic parasites law and points out to the people who are waiting for the food from the person that is being economically terrorized and he says, "This right here >> No, what? I'm guys. >> If you're just joining, listen. >> You want to hear something crazy? That's illegal. >> You want to hear something crazy? You want to hear something really crazy? Yeah, let me hear something crazy. This guy just shot up a school. That would be crazy. You want to hear something crazy? This guy right here was just in the post office and he was holding people hostage. That would be crazy. But having a license plate cover on your on your license plate is not crazy. What what this guy thinks is crazy ain't nothing at all. And it wouldn't be crazy if you had shake on the on the floorboard of your vehicle. It wouldn't be crazy if you had truly wouldn't be crazy if you had 10 lb of the white stuff in the trunk of your car. It'd be crazy if you had a body in the back of your car. That would be crazy. But it is by no means crazy that you have a license plate cover on a license plate that the cop could clearly read. He's just following the codes and the the laws. And you got to go down. So, what this is is a violation of 18 USC 242. This is deprivation of rights under the color of what? Traffic law. Even if it was deprivation of rights under the color of drug war laws, that's still a deprivation of your rights under the color of what they're calling laws. And that that kind of stuff should never ever be tolerated to any degree in any shade on any level. Period. And if you disagree, I'd like to hear what you have to say about it. And this next case right here, I don't know if you remember this blind innocent deaf cerebral palsy guy is beaten by lying cops who are protected by this twisted system filled with corrupt people, but I thank goodness for Dave Bixby cuz he completely exposed this and blew it out of the water. The question is what's going to happen now that we have this knowledge. Check this out. I'm not I'm not intentionally trying to raise your blood pressure here, but we have got to be aware of what's going on and we also have to be aware that while we live in this life, people who are breathing the same air that we breathe are actually licking these guys boots. That's why we call them bootlickers. It's like can these law enforcement agents do anything that you would disagree with? Is it possible that their actions could be so heinous, so corrupt, so disturbing, so monstrous that you would pull back and go, "You know what? I can't support the thin blue line anymore. Because it's not just that that one guy did an evil thing, it's that after he did the evil thing, the entire department covered up for it and in this case, the city council covered up for it. Watch how horrific the actions of these cops are on this innocent guy who absolutely did anything wrong. Let's see. >> If you want to know why the two Phoenix cops who repeatedly beat and tased an innocent deaf man with cerebral palsy got their suspensions overturned, it's a city secret and the city won't tell you. >> I may be C15 Chief Williams. >> And everybody knows it. Everybody knows this happens all the time. >> It's the Gator Dave Bixby. We exposed the story and now we're back here at the parking lot where it happened two years ago. And we're back because we're going to show you how accountability dies. Taking you back from the place where it happened to the secret closed door meetings where that discipline disappeared. >> I'll now call the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. >> You probably have no idea who these people are and you can see almost no one goes to their meetings. >> Welcome I'm going to welcome everyone to the Civil Service Board meeting. >> But they're a special city board. They have the power to erase suspensions. They can hear cases in secret. They don't have to explain their decisions and that's why we're here. >> anyone else that um wants to submit public comments? >> Members of Phoenix's Civil Service Board ignored our interview requests to tell the public >> I'll see. >> why they overturned the suspensions for the two officers who did this. >> And not only that, when this guy came out of the Dollar General, he didn't suspect anything. This guy's deaf, he didn't hear anything. He didn't see it coming cuz they came up behind him. He has no idea what's going on and when two I don't care if they're wearing a uniform, when two guys are rushing you like this, the first thing you want to do is like, you know, you want to put up your arms and kind of protect yourself. It's like you're so confused what's going on here? How can this be happening to me? >> Jason Jason Jason >> My name is Dave Biscobing with ABC 15. I have covered the Tyrone McCalpin arrest since the beginning. Given this board's decisions to rescind the suspensions against the two officers, I'm really hoping that I could speak to any of you who'd be willing to discuss your decisions to understand and better what happens. >> Not only are they committing criminal activity, I mean committing the criminal activity is one thing. Committing the criminal activity on multiple cameras from multiple angles so that everybody can see clearly exactly what has happened and you don't have to take anyone's word for it. You don't have to take the guy who was abused word for it. You don't have to take the cops word for it. If there were witnesses, you don't have to take their word for it. You can see it playing out before your very eyes. That's the level of criminality we're talking about. And it's such deep corruption that I I think it's so surreal that that it just keeps going on cuz people like this it this can't be our reality. >> WHY UH SUSPENSION WAS something you felt was not warranted in this case? I know the community still has a lot of uh questions about how this ALL PLAYED OUT. AND GIVEN THE CONFIDENTIAL nature of how these decisions are reached WITH THIS BOARD >> BUT THEY'RE NOT JUST BEATING HIM. THEY'RE electrocuting this guy. You can send somebody into a full-blown heart attack doing this. Not only that, they're giving a command that's impossible for him to obey. You're seizing up like this. And they're saying, "Put your hands back." How How do How does a board basically become a board? How does a board It's almost like you rigor mortis, but you're alive. Try to put a the arms of a of a person who's got rigor mortis behind his back. It's not going to happen. He's basically like a stone, like a rock. They're giving him commands. It It's not even They're not just beating him up. They're electrocuting him, and they're giving him commands that he cannot obey. And now they're going to beat him in the head cuz he's not obeying the commands that he can't obey. >> I'm hoping that uh you'll contact me and we can have a discussion about that. Um my email is Dave@abc15. Again, it's very simple. Dave@abc15. So, thank you. >> No one on the board ever responded. >> Um we'll now move on to the next item. >> And we'll get back to them later. But right now, we should talk more about the case so you can see what happened before it ever got to the board. It was August 19th, 2024 when Tyrone McCalpin was punched and tased by officers Benjamin Harris and Kyle Sue. So, why did they rush him? They initially got called to a Circle K because this man was causing a scene and the store wanted him trespassed. But, when the officers got there, he pointed across the street at Tyrone and falsely claimed Tyrone stole his phone and assaulted him. The cops left that man and went after Tyrone. >> They just believed the hearsay. They didn't do an investigation. They just believed this guy. That's all it took. So, basically, based on hearsay, hearsay is the king, hearsay is the supreme law of the land, and based on hearsay, you get to lose your rights. And, oh, by the way, um if things go south, you could lose your life. >> Stand up. >> After all the punches and tasers, they arrested and charged Tyrone with the resisting arrest and aggravated assault on police. >> It was several And then you get to go to jail. >> Weeks after >> If you live through the experience, you will be thrown into a cage after we kidnap you. What a What a deal. It sounds just like land of the free, home of the brave to me. >> for what happened here when sources told us about the case. Shocked Tyrone was still locked up and facing charges. Then we got leaked body camera footage and went to court to watch officers justify their charges against Tyrone. >> That probable cause hearing happened on October 1st, 2024. >> Surely the judge will step in and do the right thing, right? The cops are going to lie on the stand and the judge is going to make a decision against Tyrone. >> officers testified. Officer Harris claiming Tyrone attacked him first. >> He raised them in a manner that appeared to me he was going to use them to punch me. >> Then officer Sue claimed Tyrone bit him. Although, when he was asked under oath to pinpoint when it happened >> Were you anywhere near? >> Nope. >> He said it happened at the exact moment. >> Right there. >> You couldn't see anything. >> where officer Harris's arm is blocking the view of the camera. >> Yes. >> They just lied. That's all they can do is lie. That's it. You can count on a politician to lie. You can count on a cop to lie. Whenever you're in their presence, just assume that whatever comes out of their mouth is a lie, and if they're acting friendly, it's just cuz they're trying to set you up. >> Okay. >> The judge found there was probable cause, and police and prosecutors continued supporting the case against him. That is, until we broke the story. >> First tonight, this is video [music] Phoenix police arresting a black man. >> it that they have the Dollar General camera footage. >> who's deaf and has cerebral palsy. [music] Breaking news, case dismissed against the man at the center of this violent arrest in Phoenix. The ABC 15 investigators were the first to release this video to the public just 1 week ago. >> 15 chief investigator Dave Biscobing broke the story and has been leading the way ever since. >> And tonight, Dave's back with another big development. He just confirmed those officers are now on paid administrative leave. >> 24-hour suspension, that's what these Phoenix officers >> Paid administrative leave for 24 I'll tell you what, guys, you did such a good job on Tyrone, we're going to give you a paid paid vacation. 24 hours, how's that sound? You mean we don't have to do anything for 24 hours? We can like sit in our houses in air-conditioned comfort, you know, throw back a cognac, maybe watch a couple movies, and you're going to pay us like 30 35 bucks an hour? And our pensions aren't being jeopardized at all? Heck yeah. That's what the police union's for, man. We're out to serve and protect ourselves, aren't we? Rah, rah, rah, sis, boom, bah, suki, yudi, yudi, where do I sign? >> for getting for repeatedly punching and tasering an innocent deaf man with cerebral palsy. >> The suspensions publicly announced in March 2025, but behind the scenes, both officers filed appeals. And that takes us back to the Civil Service Board. It's these five people >> The Civil Service Board. >> appointed by the City Council to decide city disciplinary appeals. In a 4-1 vote in February, the board first overturned suspension for off >> Now, watch this. It's the same board, but in a 4-1 vote, they overturned the suspension. Check out the next part of this. >> Officer Sue. Then in May, with a 3-1 vote, it did the same for off >> Did they lose a member or something? Because 4 + 1 is 5, 3 + 1 is 4, so they lost one. I want to know who the one who said, "No, we're going to sustain the suspension. We are not going to overturn it." >> Officer Harris. Right after learning about the vote, we broke >> How do you First of all, how do you as a council member, a civil servant, look at the same video that we just saw and know that Tyrone is innocent and the cops acted 100% on hearsay? How do you watch the same video we just watched and come to the conclusion of we have to overturn the suspension. These police officers, we got to get them right back out on the street because that's going to benefit the community. You know what would be poetic justice? If after they overturned the suspension, these same two cops did something to them or their family. I'm talking about the council members. Did something to the council members uh themselves or to their family members. Tasing them, beating them in the head when they didn't comply, just tackling them out of the blue when they come out of, you know, JCPenney or Walmart or something. >> The story about the overturned suspensions. >> Suspensions overturned. The two officers who repeatedly punched and tasered an innocent deaf man with cerebral palsy >> It's a It's literally a violent attack caught on camera. >> are no longer facing any real discipline. >> But again, no board members agreed to an interview. It's why we showed up at their June meeting to keep pushing for answers. And so did this state disability rights advocate. >> You know what You know, I think the only solution to this is just putting out a getting all towns people together, find out who is on board with this, sign a petition, make a public announcement of if you law enforcement agents who claim to be protecting and serving the rest of us. Do anything close to this right here or you violate our rights, our unalienable rights in any way, you can expect us to defend ourselves. If you mess with us unconstitutionally, immorally, expect pushback. What do you think they would do? We just want to put you on notice and we're putting it in writing, we're making it, we're putting it out on video. If you do that kind of stuff and we understand the repercussions of this cuz if you mess with us, you know you can deploy all the resources of the state and bring us to heel and all that kind of stuff, but you know, couple of you may not live through the experience. What if the towns people did that? >> Reroute is with the Arizona Developmental Disabilities Planning Council. >> Mr. Chair. Members of the board, good afternoon. >> She also addressed the board and blasted the city in an interview after the meeting. >> When the organization heard that the suspensions were being lifted, was that a >> Yeah, I know. I Yeah, they would it would not end well. It would not end well and it never does. Because the problem is there are so many lemmings that do continue to back the blue. The indoctrination even when you get out of the indoctrination program, there's still those entanglements in your mind and it's firing in your neurons and that thing that says, well, >> you're being a bad person if you resist the authoritai. >> Cuz that's what they want you to believe. They want you to believe that if you don't hand them their your ID upon demand, if you don't pull over right when they said to pull you over like remember Rodney Dunn over there in Arkansas, the pregnant lady was she put her hazards on, she slowed down, there were concrete barriers on both sides, she was just looking for a safe place to pull over, but that wasn't good enough for Rodney Dunn. He went ahead and pitted her and turned her vehicle rolled over and she didn't commit a crime. And she was trying to comply, but that wasn't good enough for Rodney Dunn. Yeah, no but they will view you are the criminal. You must be brought down and you must be brought down now and that's why I'm going 140 miles an hour to chase you. I don't care how many lives I put in jeopardy. This is all for public safety. It's just demented and it's delusional. >> Surprise? >> Honestly, it was a total surprise. It was just a gut punch all over again from the get-go. This case >> intended. >> This was really, really egregious. >> There are very few public records about the board's decisions. They get to hear the evidence in secret and the city's report and recommendation to the board is confidential. >> We had no idea there was this process that was not transparent going on behind the scenes to really lift any sort of meaningful disciplinary measures for the officers. >> In fact, this is all that exists for each case. Just over two pages with no specifics. It lists the witnesses, a generic description of alleged policy violations, a basic paragraph of the findings, and the vote. >> So the city says we're going to do an internal investigation and then we find out now that this has all been whittled down to basically no discipline. I wonder, I wonder if you wonder, did they ever consult any sort of expert, you know, regarding disabilities or movement disorders, etc., about how Tyrone reacted, his movements, etc., or if they just take this basically what police say is he attacked them. >> I have no idea if they did that or not. I would >> really glad they played that footage in slow motion. Watch this. Look at Tyrone's eyes. Let's start this from the beginning. >> This has all been whittled down to basically no discipline. I wonder, I wonder if you wonder, did they ever >> Look, just a regular sunny day. Tyrone has no idea what's going on. He doesn't have a clue that somebody just implicated him in a crime and the cops are taking it seriously. Look at this. We'll just take it frame by frame. >> consult >> Look at this. All of a sudden they're rushing up, running up to him. And and a defenseless man, deaf, cerebral palsy, innocent. >> Any sort of expert you know >> on him. He put his hands up. The cop's lying and saying he threw a punch at me. I don't even see a punch. >> etc. About how Tyrone reacted, his movements, etc. >> Even if he did punch him, he'd be perfectly justified in doing so. >> Or if they just take this Basically, what police say is he attacked them. >> I have no idea if they did that or not. I would >> You You can't attack somebody when they attacked you first. You are I don't care who's attacking you. You're being attacked. You're not the attacker. You're the victim. What? >> totally encourage any city and law enforcement entity to have an advisory group or have experts ready to go before something happens. >> We confirmed the city did not bring in any disability experts and none spoke to the board. But we confirmed Police Chief Matt Giordano addressed the board. In fact, look at this archive video of the May meeting. The city started recording about a minute before the meeting officially started. You can see the chief smiling and greeting the officer's attorney before they all go and talk about the case in secret. Chief Giordano would not agree to an interview, but a spokesperson said the chief quote supported the policy violations sustained against officers Sue and Harris even though the investigation was completed before he took office. >> My last question then really is I you know, people look at this incident and they wonder I wonder what could Tyrone have done differently and I don't know what that answer is. >> Nothing. >> [laughter] [gasps] >> As as a human being, that's my first >> And I don't know what that answer is. >> I you know, I anybody who watches that video is going to be sick to their stomach. >> God, they're just This this is It's just you know, human to human. >> It's merciless. There's absolutely no mercy. There's There's compassion. There's no humanity in any of this. >> to their stomach. And just >> wailing on the guy as he's face down in the asphalt as they're tasing him. >> That's just, you know, human >> What What did these guys do? I mean, I always think about this and I'm sure you do, too. It's just logical to think about this. How many people have they done this to and it wasn't recorded? Uh What What is their home life like? Is there some kind of domestic violence thing going on? You can't convince me that there's not. We know about the FBI crime stat that uh the law enforcement and law enforcement profession is filled with people who are 40% more likely than the general population to abuse a spouse, to abuse a child. Why? Because power corrupts, it tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And so this corruption transcends the profession. When they take off that uniform, they're still the same person, and they expect you to obey them. They expect you to comply. They're control freaks. Only a control freak would try to grab the ring of power and control somebody else against their will and without their consent. >> I I I have no idea what anybody uh could HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY. >> [screaming and groaning] >> A COUPLE OF FINAL THINGS HERE. ONE, >> I know what somebody could have done differently. I mean, cuz some people are starting to do it. They start fighting back. They start exercising their Second Amendment. >> Brown has filed a lawsuit and that's still ongoing. And two, no one on the city council was willing to comment on the overturned suspensions, either. >> Of course not. >> I'm investigator Dave Biscobing, ABC15. >> Dave Biscobing, keep on doing what you're doing. You're doing a really, really good job cuz we got to expose these things. And hopefully, the the balance of power will change. Hopefully, people will come to their senses and go, "I don't know why I supported the thin blue line of silence and tyranny. Uh I I got it I got to start thinking for myself. I got to start critically thinking. I got to slip back into my humanity because that's what happens when you become a thin blue line bootlicker and you're supporting the thin blue line of silence and you're supporting all this tyranny and oppression against uh human beings when you know you wouldn't want that same thing done to yourself, you're losing your humanity. The very presence of cops and the acceptance of the presence of cops and the crap that they do and pull on all of us uh at all times and all places and then the cover-up within the department when they walk up to somebody like this who's completely innocent and they know they don't have any there's no they don't have any reason to stop them. They don't have reasonable articulable suspicion this guy's committed a crime. They're just taking somebody's word for it and they could more than likely be tackling an innocent person. If you approve of this, you've succumbed to the psychological operation the psychological warfare campaign of losing your humanity. You have been successfully demoralized. You've been moved away from your own conscience, your own critical thinking and that's why police are powerful. That's why they can do what they do. That's why the politicians can write the laws that they that they write and that's why the law enforcers enforce the laws that the politicians do write because people are okay with it. They're like this is just the way it is. You know, I know you may not like it. I might not like it sometimes too, but this is what law and order looks like. Otherwise, we're going to have anarchy and chaos. Well, guess what? Anarchy is not chaos. Anarchy says, "Hey, I am my own person. The only person who can tell me what to do because I'm an adult is me. I'm not going to tell you what to do. I can't speak into your life. I don't have a higher claim over your life and property than you. You don't have a higher claim over my life and property than me, but cops think the opposite. They really believe that they have the right to control you. They have the right to extract your ID from you. They have the right to hamstring you and to harass you and to pull you over because your your your lights were too dim in the front of your car. One of your license plate lights was out. We got to stop you and harass you. Hey, hey bud, it's no big deal. You mind me giving getting your ID? If it's no big deal, why'd you stop me? It must be a really big deal for you to for an adult to stop another adult. It's just so foreign and people have to understand that it's foreign and they have to stop going along with it. What do you think? Do you think that Tyrone got a fair shake? I Let me ask you this. What would you have done if you were Tyrone? Would you have fought back? And what are the ramifications? What are the repercussions for fighting back in this day and age when so many people you would probably have law enforcement loving do-gooders come to the aid of the cop when you were completely innocent and they're the ones engaged in criminal activity because they're always going to give you know, when I say they, the people who are successfully indoctrinated will always come to the aid of the cop. But here's another thing, too. If you and I you and I knowing what we know, what if we came to the aid of the person who's being beat by the cop? Well, then you would be treated like a criminal and when when they hunted the guy that you freed down, they're going to hunt you down, too, because now you've become an accomplice in what they considered a crime even though the real criminal activity was being propagated and initiated and foisted by the law enforcement agents. God, man. This this land is filled with criminality. The question is, what are we going to do about it? This next thing right here, we've got um this guy Blue Triple Zeros takes people takes the law enforcement agent to court and destroys this guy on the witness stand. Put a one in the room if you're still with me. Let me read some real quick. I'm going to take a brief break right here and read some of the super chats you guys sent and I will read them out at the end of the video as well. I appreciate you guys being here. I've no idea how many people are in here. Not very many. Not very many. It's amazing how much this channel is suppressed, but that's the way it is. That's the way it is. Back to mill says, I emailed you Shawn's video. Thank you. I'll probably take a look at that tomorrow back to mill. Thank you. Joseph Doe gifted five here's the deal memberships. Thank you, Joseph. Officer Tater Hater 1984 Brian, did you ever have a look at Lackluster's famous Jimbo Fisher case out of DeSoto County, Mississippi? It's 3 years old, but still really good. Email me uh contact@highimpactflix.com is what my email address is and give me the link to that because that does not sound familiar. Although the name Jimbo Fisher does sound just a little bit familiar. I I I can't place it. Give me a send me an email with that link. I appreciate it. The Christian fight with a big super chat. Thank you, man. Thank you for all you do. Um I've learned a lot. You are what an American hero looks like. It's my honor to donate this money. I wish I could send more. Thank you, man. The Christian fight. The Bible commands that Christians obey governments including corrupt agents. That's extraordinarily difficult for me to do. I'm try Why would you try Okay. Why would you Thanks for the super chat, but why in the hell would you try to obey a corrupt agent that belongs to one of the most one of the most insidious criminal cartels known to mankind? Why would you try to do that? You have to shelf your humanity to do that. You have to you have to throw your your conscience into the waste bin. You have to incinerate your conscience. Why would you try I don't understand that. Why would you try to obey a corrupt government and corrupt government agents? That's insane to me. So, if So, you would try to obey a corrupt government agent if they told you to kill an innocent person? Would you really try to do that? Would you try to extort somebody that a corrupt government agent told you to extort? Is that what you're saying? That hardly seems like it is in concert with Christianity. Although, I've got my issues with that, too. ML Marty 316 says, "Thanks, Brian, for all you do. Been watching you for years and always appreciate your rational, logical, intelligent analysis. No doubt your analysis and opinions needed more than ever." Thank you very much, ML Marty. I appreciate everybody who's contributing to this live stream, everybody who's chatting in the live stream, everybody who liked this video, subscribed to this channel, and shares this this live stream. I appreciate it. All this stuff is very very important. All right, let's get back to this. This guy blue triple zeros, he gets arrested, they throw his butt in jail, and he takes him to court, and this is part of the outcome. Let's go over this. >> I did smell strong odor of alcoholic beverage, but the there was no signs of alcohol from the individual. >> You're obviously going to jail tonight. >> My crime? >> DUI. >> DUI? >> Yes. >> I'm not under the influence. >> Based on him not wanting to do field sobriety, I don't believe he would be under the influence. >> And then, after he did, and told you you would have been seen at that point to get arrested. >> Yes, sir, cuz I believe he's under the influence. >> I will set aside the refusal. >> All units show 10-40 at Place West of Central. Suspect's in custody. >> All right, so this is This is from a YouTube channel. Just going to give him a shout-out real quick. Unsolved Mysteries Crime. >> We see a man getting hit in a traffic incident. He cooperates with officers, passes every test thrown at him, >> By the way, you are not required to take a field sobriety test. As a matter of fact, any good lawyer will tell you do not take a field sobriety test. Why? Because they're subjective. Yes, the the cop will say, "Well, they're not subjective. They're standardized." Yes, it's a standardized test, but it's being interpreted by a human being, which throws standardization to the to be damned. The the human being is a is going to make a subjective judgement based on what he sees. You could literally do the test better than the cop that's giving you the test and still fail it because the cop, you know, maybe you damaged his ego like that What's that What's that one guy that kid's name? The the football player and he passed the field sobriety test with flying colors. They gave him a breathalyzer. Three times he blew triple zeros and they still arrested him and then he just recently won a settlement. I can't remember how much it was. Gal Galapagos It starts starts with a la a G. His last name starts with a G. So, that's how bad it is. That's how bad our system is. You can pass the field sobriety test with flying colors. You could do it blindfolded. You could take a field sobriety test. You could take the breathalyzer test, pass it with flying colors and still get arrested. That's how corrupt police are and that's how hard up they are to throw you into a legal system that's going to cost you a whole bunch of money, fill the coffers of the state, and leave you poor. >> blows a perfect 0.00 on the breathalyzer and still ends up in handcuffs on a DUI arrest. >> No, not the professional I know Tony Romo. I did a video on that. I'm talking about that kid who was a football player for his high school in I can't remember the state. Was it It was some some one of the southern states. >> Now, he's taken those cops to court. >> Well, prove me wrong then. Do the test. Don't Don't >> After the arrest, cops took him to the hospital for further tests of drugs and >> There you go. It was Newton, Iowa. Thank you. >> alcohol. There, cop again messed up. They should have never done this. Instead, they should have taken him to a supervisor and sorted this out. >> No, they should have never taken him in the first place cuz he passed your stupid test. He went through your stupid human tricks. He took the breathalyzer test and they gave you all the signs you needed to know to dispel your fears that he might travel down the road in an inebriated state, you morons. >> How you doing, sir? [ __ ] off, dude. Man. I'm going to walk. Yep. >> [clears throat] >> I will be requesting you submit to a test your breath, blood, or urine, or any combination of these tests. >> My breath? >> If you refuse to submit to any test, which I request your refusal may result in a suspension of your driver's license by court at the time of your arraignment. And if you are convicted of violating KRS 189A.010 DUI, uh the result of suspension of your driver's license and suspension by the Transportation Cabinet. If you refuse to submit to the breath or your breath or urine test, >> I did a breath breathalyzer. >> this refusal may be used against you in court as evidence of your violation of KRS 189A.010 DUI. Although your license will be suspended, >> Just so I don't leave you guys hanging, the kid that I was just talking about was Taven Gallanakis. At that time, he was 19 years old. He was a college football player for William Penn University in Newton, Iowa. And uh it was in August 2022. he was pulled over by Newton police primarily for using high beam as headlights and the officer was officer Nathan Winters and there was a round $105,000 settlement and it later settled higher with attorney fees. >> May we all draw immediately for additional air law violations on your driver's and period of suspension? >> The key proceeding here was the refusal hearing which is extremely important in DUI related cases in the United States. A refusal hearing is not about guilt or innocence in the traditional sense. Instead, it focuses on whether a driver unlawfully refused chemical testing under implied consent laws. >> The Nathaniel Stevens 25 T 1902 on for refusal hearing is the Commonwealth ready? >> Yes, sir. >> Is the defendant ready? >> Yes, sir. >> Call your first witness. >> Commonwealth calls officer Michael Bell, Michael Bell. >> Do you raise your right hand, please? You swear and affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God? >> Yes, sir. >> Thank you. >> The defense argued that the refusal was not fully informed and that the suspect specifically requested to speak with counsel before deciding. That leads to a key legal concept, voluntariness. >> State your name for the record, please. >> It's officer Michael Bell. >> How are you employed? >> The Grayson, Kentucky Police Department. >> Were you employed at last year on October 6th of last year, 2025? >> Yes, sir. >> And did you have the occasion to come into contact with Nathaniel Stevens? >> Yes, sir. >> And was he placed under arrest for um >> Look at these cops. Just just look at them. They're pitiful. You can tell they have no self-control in their own lives and so they want desperately to control others even if it means violating their own laws to exercise that control. Even if it means breaking their own rules, their own policies, their own procedures. They can't even clean their own house. They can't even take care of their own business. They can't even take care of their own bodies. So, they're desperate. They're desperate human beings who crave power over others. That is the psychological underpinning of what's going on here when you have these kind of people messing with the rest of us. When they're in charge and in control, bad things happen. And I've I've said it so many times on this channel, but if the problem with the world is that there are evil people, then the last thing you want to do to remedy that situation is put evil people like this in control. Here, let me give you a uniform. Let me give you a badge. Let me give you a gun. And we've already taught everybody in their 15,000 hour indoctrination program called the public fool Excuse me. The public fool I'm sorry. I keep saying fool. I don't know why. The public school system that you are authorized, and if we disobey you, then we're the bad guys. That's how bad That's how corrupt That's how deep it goes. That's our current matrix that we live in. >> Allegedly driving under the influence. >> Yes, sir. >> A refusal is only valid if it is voluntary and informed. If a person is pressured, misinformed, or denied meaningful access to legal advice, then the validity of that refusal can be challenged in court. >> Here we go. >> Thank you. The original call to dispatch was for a non-injury accident. >> But once Officer Bell took the stand, the simplicity of that narrative started to fall apart. Under oath, he confirmed the basics of the stop. A non-injury traffic collision. A routine response. A situation where initially, Nate was not even considered the suspect. >> The call [snorts] was that Mr. Stevens was the victim in the accident. >> [clears throat] >> Uh the call came in that there was a two-vehicle non-injury accident. While myself and Sergeant Auger responded, we was notified that the one of the vehicles had left the scene. >> Okay. And uh, did >> In fact, the original call was essentially a minor accident where a driver had left the scene, and only later did the situation escalate into suspicion of impairment. >> And later you learned that it was a 17-year-old kid who backed out of his driveway and hit Nathan. >> Yes. >> And that he and Nathan exchanged information, and there was no issue till his father learned about the accident later when he called the police. Is that accurate? >> Uh, to the best >> I'm going to object unless he has firsthand knowledge of that happening. >> That detail is important legally because probable cause is supposed to be based on evolving evidence, not assumptions that retroactively justify >> Probable cause is supposed to be based on evolving evidence, but you got to take that a little bit further. That a crime has been committed. If you suspect that somebody's driving under the influence, and they've done everything to dispel that suspicion, including jumping through all your stupid monkey human trick rules, and passing your breathalyzer test, then you'll let them go. It's only the right thing to do. And I'm not even saying that that's what should be done, but he did jump through their hoops with flying colors, and they still put the silver bracelets on him anyway. >> An arrest. Then the defense attorney began breaking down the DUI justification piece by piece. The first major issue was the claim of alcohol odor. >> Plus, I'm going to object because we're having a refusal here, and I'm not sure how this would >> How's this relevant to the refusal? >> Well, it is relevant for a couple of reasons. We do have knowledge because his body cam was on the entire time except when he covered it to whisper. And second, during the entire encounter, there was no indication he's under the influence until a couple of things happened. So, I'll keep it very brief, just a little bit of time. >> Yeah, if you think I think I'll let you have a little leeway there. >> Thank Thank you. >> Officer Bell had written in his report that he smelled a strong odor of alcoholic beverage coming from Nate, but in court, when pressed, his memory became less certain. He hesitated. He reviewed his own report. >> You would think they would at least be smart enough for survival purposes to know how to lie properly, to understand and be fully aware that when that camera's on, when that body camera's rolling, that it it's going to be rolling for a judge and possibly a jury one day. So, I better make this at least sound right. Make it sound good. Make it sound like it's not a lie, but they can't even do that. >> I don't believe so. Let me double-check before I testify to that. >> [clears throat] >> He reviewed his own report, and even then, the certainty that typically supports probable cause simply wasn't there in a consistent way. >> Gee, I wonder >> officer claims alcohol odor, that can be a strong factor for DUI probable cause. >> I did say I could smell strong odor of alcoholic beverage, but the there was no signs of alcohol from the individual. >> I'm going to do the test. Don't Don't do that. >> Okay, sir. >> Officer claims alcohol odor. Breath test shows zero alcohol. That doesn't automatically make the officer wrong, but it requires explanation. And in court, that explanation never fully solidified. >> So, when you told me that you smelled alcohol, you what did you mean getting out? >> Not that I can recall. I mean, I don't want to >> And at that point, you got >> Oh, they just Did you see See This channel must have got this from Civil Rights Lawyer cuz there's a little blurb in there they didn't edit out. Happened real fast. Look at that. Yeah, they got this from the Civil Rights Lawyer. What channel are we watching? Unsolved Mysteries - Crime. 152,000. Wow, this guy's 401,000 views on it. So, they must have got this from Civil Rights Lawyer. That's just being a bully. And we see people saying all the time, "Oh, these these people who became cops, they're cops because they got bullied in high school and now they've got the power. Now the tables have turned. Now they're the big kids in the block and you can't question their authority. You don't want somebody like that with a badge and uniform, let alone with a firearm." I'm going to let him ask a question. Go ahead. >> Even if officers subjectively believed something suspicious was happening, they still needed probable cause at the moment of arrest, not after consultation, not after reflection, and not after a conversation out of view of the camera. >> Actually, that is a really good point from Devon that has everything to do with this video right here. Anytime you see a law enforcement agent sitting there in in a seat in a courtroom like this guy right here and this guy right here, they're getting paid. And this is probably overtime and they're probably happy to sit in an air-conditioned room where they're not, you know, there's no potential for them to be shot at. They're getting paid really, really good money to sit here and do this because they made a mistake. So, when they create a situation where they um illegally, unlawfully, unconstitutionally, immorally implicate somebody in a crime, they're basically padding their own pockets with those overtime hours. Therefore, Devon uh Noll says, "Cops have monetary incentive to pad their overtime hours by easy to arrest any sober driver for DUI. It boosts their salary and their retirement pay." Very good point. Very good point. >> But he didn't say try to spit on me. He said basically I hadn't been drinking. And you called that an aggressive maneuver, right? >> What the defense highlighted was that the objective indicators here were either missing or contradicted. The breath test was zero. The field tests were passed. The suspect was cooperative. So, what was left? Nervousness. And this is where the courtroom exchange became especially important. >> When the officer seemed to be accelerating But it could have been >> Oh, that's uh yeah, that's another thing too. The judge is getting paid. The prosecuting attorney is getting paid. The cop is getting paid. This is just a colossal waste of money. And think how much money we spend on law enforcement agents, prosecutors, and judges in courtrooms when the person who's being uh prosecuted that they're trying to prosecute is innocent. Think about how much money is being flushed down the toilet in America every day as an innocent man sits there grilled by the state agents when he's completely and utterly innocent. >> Take it as someone attempted to spit on you. Did you take it as he was trying to spit on you? >> At first, yes, but then he did actually spit. >> When you specifically asked him would you take the PBT, he said yes. >> Yes. >> And when he took the PBT, it was 0.000, correct? >> It did not determine presence of alcohol. >> Okay. There was absolutely no indication of presence of alcohol. >> Yes. >> Wow. >> And uh at that point, did you explain the consequences of him declining? >> Officer Bell described Nate as nervous, pacing, and uncooperative. But when the defense attorney compared that testimony with the body cam footage, a different picture emerged. >> When he took that test, when he took the PBT >> No, sir. I was trying to spit in his mouth. >> Okay. So, did his hesitation all along appear to be lack of explanation, lack of understanding, rather than lack of cooperation? >> Uh there was a passive I mean, he was very questionable about it, but I mean, I responded the same as I would do any other traffic stop. >> And his behavior and the fact there was nothing in the PBT is consistent with no alcohol consumption. >> The defense raised a critical argument that the arrest decision shifted after Nate mentioned legal action. While correlation is not proof of retaliation, timing becomes relevant when evaluating whether first amendment rights were implicated. >> After the PBT, he tried to call me, didn't he? >> Oh, I I would love to see a lawyer go Now, Officer Brown are you getting paid extras to sit here in this court proceeding over and above what you normally would get paid? Is this kind of overtime for you? Yeah, in most cases it is. So, you're making time and a half or double time and a half, wherever you are in your hour chain, and you're getting beaucoup amounts of money, so you're incentivized to write more and more tickets. Who cares if the guy's guilty or not? I'm going to make a whole bunch of money. And as a cop told me in Missouri one time, man, I just I gots to feed the children. I got to have some way to feed the children. And if it means being a corrupt government official, that's just what I'm going to do. >> I tried to call your Michelle on the video, you say if you call him, he'll be a witness and he can't represent you. >> I said if he comes down here, he'll be a witness. >> What's your name? >> Bailiff, try here. >> Okay, what's your name? >> Corey Hall. >> Okay. If he shows up, he's a witness, so he can't represent you anyway. >> So, presumably he's trying to call me a lawyer. >> But at that point he was detained. >> In this case, the defense argued that probable cause was already weak before that moment and did not improve afterwards. This was one of the most damaging parts of the officer's testimony. >> At point he was detained for the investigative purposes of >> Answer the question. >> What was your question? >> He tried to call me and you told him if he comes down here, he's a witness and he can't represent you. You told him that. >> And while the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is limited during roadside stops, due process still requires that decisions >> Are you trying to tell people they can't call their lawyer? >> No, sir. >> Under what authority do you have to tell somebody if they try to call a lawyer, you can't call him, he can't represent you? >> One full of traffic stop here detained uh until that you're afforded an opportunity if we go for any kind of chemical testing. >> So, back with the testing, again, he said he didn't want to take the test without his lawyer present and you had previously told him that >> The defense argued that Nate attempted to consult his lawyer before making a decision, but was not given meaningful opportunity to do so. Additionally, there confusion created about whether contacting a lawyer would disqualify that lawyer from representation if they arrived on scene. >> He actually admitted that he wasn't trained to tell a person that he has detained if that his lawyer comes down he's just a witness and he can't represent you. He actually admitted that he wasn't trained and I think the defense attorney should have pressed him on it. Then where did you get the idea? Why did you say that? Is that within your policies, procedures, or protocols? Did you say something that was unconstitutional in an attempt to violate this guy's rights? Just keep on pushing. >> further observation testing but he's afforded to contact and communicate with an attorney via phone. >> Did you sit down and tell him the difference between a lawyer not being able to represent him if he shows up at the scene versus not being able to represent him if he calls during the implied consent? >> No, it's in the implied consent that he's afforded 10 minutes when I pulled over 15 minutes to attempt to contact and communicate with an attorney. >> And lack of cooperation was contradicted by the officer's own acknowledgement that Nate followed instructions, agreed to testing, and complied with requests. >> And this is kind of why, I mean, you guys can play it play this way you want to and I'm not saying play like I believe this is a game but they think it's a game but you have to be very aware of what's going on. They have body cams, they have dash cams. Whether they do or don't, you should have your own camera out and I would just suggest having as many cameras as you possibly can. Some kind of recording device so you can record everything the cop says cuz I can almost guarantee you 100% of the time they are going to lie about what happened. They're going to lie to you in person to try to get you to talk. They're going to lie on the report, they're going to lie to their commanding officer, they will lie on the witness stand. That's just what they do. Just like water is wet and fire is hot, politicians and cops lie. That's just what they do. It goes hand-in-hand. So, I would just suggest if you ever get in this situation, number one, the first thing you should reach for safely because like I said, you have to play this right. Keep your hands where they can see them so you don't scare them. They're very They're very disturbed. They're very weak. They're weak-minded. They're very scared individuals. So, you want to dispel any kind of fears as much as it depends on you, grab your cell phone and watch your P's and Q's on what you're saying and be very aware that what you're saying is being recorded either by you or by the cop or both and a dash cam, body cam, your camera, and that a jury is going to see this. So, your goal in this game is to make sure that you look the best you can possibly look because the cop already looks bad by doing what he's doing. But if you look the best you can possibly look, it'll make the person who's bad look even worse because you're trying to curry if if this goes to court, you're trying to curry favor with the jury, with the judge, because this is a game of perception and perception is everything. If they see you as being, you know, at least moderately compliant, and I'm not saying roll over and give up your rights, you know, when the cop asks you questions, you can either just remain silent or just ask the cop questions. It's not advisable to be answering a whole bunch of questions and you know, telling the cop where you're coming from, where you're going, who you were with, how long you were there, what you got in the car, can I search your vehicle, sure, go ahead. Oh, I revoke consent. It's best if you don't know how to talk to a cop to just keep your mouth shut. But if you don't want to keep your mouth shut and you want to lay the groundwork for legal, you know, legalese and constitutional practices and your rights under the, being deprived under the color of law, then you can play that game, but you the key is to be hyper aware that whatever you say will probably be seen in a courtroom somewhere, or at least in the court of public opinion. And if you got the whole if you got the nation on your side, and it becomes very obvious to them that an injustice was done, then now you can probably fund your your campaign, you know, set up a GoFundMe because people will see you as the innocent party you truly are. And you got to make it easy for people cuz remember what you have to overcome is the incessant indoctrination of the masses who've long ago shelved their critical thinking to the point where there's cobwebs and dust all over it. That critical thinking, that conscience hasn't moved in a long time, but you want to make it so clear that somebody who is devoid of that conscience and that critical thinking can look at that body cam, that dash cam, or your camera evidence and go, "You know what? An injustice was done here. This man right here is innocent, and that cop right there is the guilty party." That's kind of the That's kind of where we're at. If anybody disagrees with what I'm saying there, let me know, and let's go ahead and proceed with this. >> So, the legal question the judge was left with was simple but powerful. If all objective evidence shows sobriety, what exactly justified the DUI arrest? >> He's fine with you wanting to You gave call me and you tell me that I couldn't have 0.1% You got me I'm I'm breathing. How was he on the walk? >> He was very confrontational. Was back and forth on wanting to submit to test. >> He was very confrontational, says the guy who was doing the confronting. >> But after you told him what the test was, he did except for the After preliminary test interview. >> He didn't. >> Under US constitutional law, especially First Amendment precedent, a person cannot be punished or arrested in retaliation for protected speech, including criticism >> They can't be, but they're arrested for a protect exercising protected speech all the time. >> or statements like, "I will sue." That does not mean officers can never arrest someone after they say something like that. >> And with the camera you were trying to hold Officer Hall and arrest him for illegal drugs? >> No, sir. I was speaking to him. >> Okay. And at that time you weren't in fear for your safety, was it for the officer's safety or anything? >> No, sir. >> Why would you cover your camera? >> It was uh I got to ask what happened. Spoke with Sergeant Hall, wait, he wasn't >> Was it traffic? >> It was uh I removed it off my chest to go up and speak with Sergeant Hall. We were in contact with the other party there, so it was just >> That's tampering with evidence right there. Geez. >> I spoke with Sergeant Hall. And with that it was right after he said, "If you would have arrested me, you would have been sued." Was that it? >> Not that I can recall. >> Did that have anything to do with you covering the camera and whispering to Sergeant Hall? >> No, sir. >> Because once the refusal was set aside, and once the breath test showed zero alcohol, and once field sobriety tests were passed, the DUI charge itself lost much of its factual foundation. That is ultimately why, as later developments confirmed, the DUI charge did not survive prosecutor >> I know, it's subliminal civil rights lawyer one frame. >> real review. >> Mr. Stevens asked me specifically what would happen if I asked him to continue doing the test. If I do these these tests and I pass, am I good? And what did you say? Do you Do you that question? >> No, sir. Do you recall hearing Officer Hall say if you're not in fear you will be? I don't recall that, sir. And after that assurance Mr. Saban, at that time >> I I don't know about you. I don't know about you, but if I was a defense attorney, first of all, I couldn't be an attorney because I would only represent people I truly believed in and was convinced in my own heart were innocent. But if I was a defense attorney, I would have a flat screen TV set up or I'd I'd ensure that it was there. I'd be able to you know, stream to it or cast to it and I'd have all my video ducks in a row. And when I asked this creepy cop these questions, did you say this? And he goes, "No, I didn't say this." And then I pull it up on my phone and I play exhibit 1A, play, and then he says the very thing that he just said in the courtroom that he didn't say. You could so easily with today's technology blow this cop out of the water and submit all this stuff as evidence. I don't even know why cops don't do it. Talk about a slam dunk, knocking this thing out of the park, easy peasy, 1 2 3, done. Don't have to count on the cops' testimony or additional police officer witnesses or what the department said or what a passing witness said or what the judge is going to believe. You just show it in living color, in 4K, 1080p, 720p, it doesn't matter. You're going to have the video evidence. And I do not understand why am am I missing something? Why don't defense attorneys bring this in as they're going to bat for their client? >> Do you recall saying that, sir? >> Yes, sir. >> You did everything you described? >> Yes, sir. >> That does not mean officers can never arrest someone after they say or do something, but it does mean that the arrest must be independently justified by probable cause that exists before the speech or action becomes a factor. >> Yeah, probable cause that a crime has been committed, but if everything has been dispelled by the test that were taken, what do you do when the law enforcement agent continues to exact his tyranny on you? >> So, based on it all, the judge refuses the charges. >> I told him like I just asked you, he had not done this, >> [clears throat] >> he would have been going to jail. >> Yes, sir. >> Would you agree that that insinuated he wasn't going to jail at that time? >> No, sir. I wasn't saying that I had enough based off him not wanting to do field sobriety and I believe he would be under the influence. >> Then after he did, and told you you would have been sued at that point and he got arrested. >> Yes, sir, because I believe he was under the influence. >> Finally, after all testimony was heard, the judge made a key decision. The refusal was set aside. In legal terms, that means the court determined the refusal could not stand as valid evidence for administrative or criminal penalty purposes. In other words, it could not be used against Nate as a lawful refusal. >> I will set aside the refusal. >> But, you know, the the thing that drives me crazy about this is these cops are going to be they're going to continue to do what they've been doing. They're going to continue to initiate their criminal actions on people they're supposed to be protecting and serving. And with a system like this, the system will never change. These cops will continue doing what they're doing, and they'll continue to get the reward they're getting, and I have no doubt that the cops that you see on the screen right here will probably have plaques on the wall, they'll get medals, they'll get commendations, they'll get promotions, they'll get pay raises, and they'll get pensions, and they'll be they'll retire nice, dumb, fat, and happy, and they'll leave as a legacy for themselves and their children a whole bunch of innocent people who've been harmed and criminalized and caged and and made to dangle at the end of their rope as they try to struggle to get by with life as they've been, you know, basically economically terrorized and demoralized and dehumanized by law enforcement agents that they trusted to protect and serve them. And until that kind of system changes, I don't see how we can get ourselves out of this mess. That's why I have this channel. That's why there's so many people out there with these channels that spread the education so that hopefully we can turn the light on in the minds of the people, and we can end all this madness because it truly is madness. When you have people like this basically ruling over you, it's a disgusting thought. Like I said a couple minutes ago, they can't even clean their own houses. They can't even take care of their own bodies. They can They can't exercise self-discipline for themselves, and yet they're going to execute and initiate some kind of roadside justice or judgment on you, which is far from justice. It's a judgment, but it's an unrighteous judgment. So, leave your thoughts about this. What do you think about this? What would you have done if you were in this situation? And if you were an attorney, how would you have handled this case? I just feel like this case could have been handled far easier with uh crystal clarity and uh way more articulate. I think the defense attorney did a horrible horrible job, in my opinion. He may have got the judge to do what he wanted him to do, but man, we need to We need to move in the opposite direction and go after these cops' qualified immunity. They have literally deprived this man of his rights under the color of nothing. Because the guy passed all the tests. He went through all the hoops. He He managed to evade all of their laws and their policies and their protocols. He did everything that he was supposed to do, and they still took him to jail. So, let Let know what you have to say about this. I really appreciate you guys being here. Don't forget to like this video and share this video with everybody you know. I got to head out of here in a second cuz somebody's trying to call me and I really got to get this call, but I want to I want to give a shout-out to everybody who participated in and supported this channel with their their donations. You've got Bacchus Shamuel, Joseph, Officer Tater Hater. Hope I don't skip anybody. The Christian Fight, again the Christian Fight again, ML Marty, and JT gifted oh, five Here's the Deal memberships. If you became a member, give give a shout-out to JT and to Joseph Doe, and those memberships go out randomly per the YouTube algorithm. Appreciate you guys being here and doing that. Don't forget to like this video, share this video. Appreciate you guys being here, and I will see you in the next video. If you haven't already subscribed to my the Disturbing Illusions channel, you're on Here's the Deal right now, and I also have a channel called High Impact Vlogs, v l o g s. I appreciate you Oh, somebody else just dropped a super chat. Gifted membership. Thank you, Michael. Appreciate that. Take care, guys. I will see you in the next video.