Channel operation
Preparing…
Starting…
- Elapsed time
- 0s
- Estimated remaining
- Estimating…
No changes saved yet.
Keep this page open while work is running. Estimates change with channel size; leaving may interrupt unsaved work.
View resultsTranscript Details
- Language
- en
- Format
- text
- Source
- scrappa
- Auto-generated
- Yes
- Confidence
- N/A
- Created
- 2026-10-22 12:27
Transcript Content
But, I don't confess. I don't search the Caesars, okay? So, remember that for the record. I'm suing the [ __ ] out of you guys. I've been waiting for this. I don't I don't answer questions. >> So, he talks just like a Dr. Judge follower right here. I believe he is a Dr. Judge follower. >> I don't have a problem. I saw him driving away. I didn't >> All right. Do you have your license on you? >> Yeah, but you don't need it. >> Uh-uh. >> Yeah, you don't Absolutely do so. >> No, you don't, ma'am. >> Galanisita >> What? You got You got me messed up. >> You are involved in an investigation. >> Not going to investigate. No, you don't. I didn't do nothing. I didn't commit a crime. >> Absolutely >> You need me? >> Absolutely >> That's a negative, ma'am. >> I can tell from his demeanor that he hasn't been pulled over for a lawful reason. They're encountering him during their investigation, and guess what? He's not required to help them in their investigation. He's not required to identify himself unless they have reasonable articulable suspicion of a criminal offense of him. And he stands firm, you're not getting my ID. >> Did it. >> Are you going to give >> There is no crime committed. No, because there's no crime committed. >> Well, you're going to give me your ID. >> I don't need to give you my ID. I didn't do nothing. There's no crime committed. Yeah, no problem, sir. Have a good night. >> Have a good night. >> No problem. >> Really? >> Yep. >> Real cops don't arrest people for this. They need to realize he's not required to help you in your investigation, and he doesn't have to ID himself unless he's committed an offense. And what does that mean? That means there's reasonable, speakable evidence against him for having either just committed a crime, during the commission of a crime, or about to commit a crime. I don't think they have that here. What do you think? Comment below. Tell me what you think. Were these cops proper, or was this an discretion?
Danger Zone
This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.