Transcript Details
- Language
- en
- Format
- text
- Source
- youtube-transcript-api
- Auto-generated
- Yes
- Confidence
- N/A
- Created
- 2025-06-30 02:44
Transcript Content
foreign good morning this is Daniel here with cops and cons TV just want to welcome everyone into our live stream so if you could let us know in the comments here where everybody's from maybe we'll have a local story or some information about where you're coming from today so part of what we do here on this live stream every Friday is I go over some of the just the most important interesting stories that happen in the world of police and law and news and all of these issues are connected and a lot of them are a lot of issues even in news and in law they have to do with policing and policing is just one of this the most interesting things that are out there and one of the most important topics that we can be talking about so um it kind of like we do every time as I'm going through these stories you know it'd be great if you could just put in comments and questions if you have anything for us if you have some information that maybe I don't have here or you have a different take on it definitely put it in the comments and we can go ahead and go back and forth a little bit I'm always interested to see what our audience has to say about these cases and so just if you haven't already make sure you go ahead and subscribe to Cops and cons TV that way you know when we do our live stream so we usually do it sometime around lunchtime uh on Fridays but definitely subscribe to our Channel so you can know exactly when we're going to be coming on alive also if you want to follow me go ahead and do that at police law news on Tick Tock and YouTube and all other channels um and the first thing that I want to start with today is to first of all I want to thank everyone for uh participating in our 14-hour live feed that we had on by accident so there were some really funny and interesting comments not sure how that got turned on but the 14-hour live stream did really good um definitely going to bump up our numbers so thank you so much for participating in that also I want to give a shout out to Captain McCoy over at the full sheer Texas Police Department every now and then police departments and in supporters of law enforcement send us patches which is how we have this awesome patch wall behind us so I just want to give a shout out to Captain McCoy over at the full Shear Police Department in Texas they sent us a patch we think that it's awesome anyone else who's in law enforcement who wants to do that and we can definitely put it up on the wall behind us and feature it send us an email L and we will arrange that but again thank you so much the full sheer police department and Captain McCoy that is it's always awesome to get stuff like that so um let's see where's everybody from today we've got people from we've got Sergeant George I wish we had 10 000 like you uh let's see we got someone from Kentucky great awesome okay so we're going to get into these stories the first story that we have to get into I mean it really broke last night as soon as I woke up this morning this is the absolute first thing I saw so didn't think I was going to be leading with this but things happen sometimes that you can't do anything about so in San Francisco uh Paul Pelosi Nancy Pelosi's husband he's 82 years old he was the victim of a violent crime last night and the San Francisco Police Department did a press conference a little bit ago and here's what we know so far so last night at approximately 2 30 in the morning Nancy Pelosi you know obviously she's the speaker of the house after the Vice President she would be next in line to be president of the United States she was in Washington DC and her husband and 82 year old Paul Pelosi was home alone while he was home at 2 30 in the morning an assailant a 42 year old broke into the house and essentially tried to kidnap and hold Mr Pelosi hostage I mean this is a serious violent crime the individual was armed with a hammer and he actually did beat Mr Pelosi with the hammer he tried to tie him up some of the things that the offender said during this is he was saying where's Nancy where's Nancy and he was saying that he wanted to basically try to hold and tie up Paul Pelosi until Nancy Pelosi came home now the information that we have right now is that there weren't police on site so police officers weren't physically there guarding the house but there must have been some video feed or some surveillance or security system because police officers responded and were actually able to get there really quickly the information from both the San Francisco police department and the Capitol Police who you know does have um responsibility in jurisdiction along with the U.S Marshals to provide security for people in Congress and elected officials you know what they said is that as police got there on scene that somehow both Mr Pelosi and the offender this 42 year old man were both armed with a hammer or they were wrestling over the same hammer and it was at that point that the police officers rushed in and tackled the offender so they did give his name which I'm not going to read on here they did say he's a 42 year old male and they did not announce a motive but if we think about this you know the fact that he was yelling where's Nancy where's Nancy I mean not that it is for sure but just uh thinking just the most reasonable thing to think is that this is someone who is ideologically opposed to Nancy Pelosi um the where's Nancy chance kind of is reminiscent of some of the nonsense that happened on January 6th so I'm not saying that's for sure with what happened but that's what it seems like at least from The Limited information that we've been giving from law enforcement this morning um this isn't the first time that the Pelosi's home has been targeted by criminals so back last year there were some painting and some vandalism that was done at the Pelosi's home in spray paint the words cancel rent and we want everything along with a pig's head we're left on their property so when you look at that evidence that seems like okay that's someone from the far left the whole cancel rent crowd the we want everything crowd that's typically stuff from the far left um that you would that you would see that from however this time it does seem like it's someone who is is on the the right side of things far right unreasonable and insane is what it seems like the individual today so the good thing is that he was arrested by police he is in custody I'm sure they'll give us more information and they did say that Mr Pelosi is uh recovering he should make a full recovery but think about it this guy is 82 years old he's been through a lot with his drunk driving arrest and then now with this any 82 year old who's beaten with a hammer it just isn't isn't a good good situation so um yeah I think it's good that he's making a recovery and hopefully they hold this violent offender uh responsible um the the idea that there wasn't just immediate security there I'm not really sure what the deal is with that but maybe the Pelosi's will think about either protecting themselves with Firearms or something else in order to make sure that this doesn't happen again and it just because Francisco is just one of the far left cities and I I it's not that I'm trying to criticize the far left it's it's that I'm trying to criticize and look at different policies because a lot of the time bad public policy leads to predictable results and I've always talked about cities like Seattle and Portland and Austin who kind of put forth these Progressive policies that have you know really just predictable just bad results and San Francisco is a prime example of that but the difference in San Francisco is that at least in the last year or so the people there are kind of starting to fight back so let's just rewind this just a little bit and you know one of the things that happened in San Francisco so between 2018 and 2022 So within the three and a half year period Walgreens closed 23 stores in the San Francisco area and this isn't because people stop needing to get prescriptions it's not because you know the owners who own these Walgreens just you know didn't want to make any more money or the businesses you know weren't profitable the reason is because of crime because of crime and shoplifting was just so out of control they couldn't keep merchandise on the shelves and the Walgreens stores also couldn't keep their employees and customers safe so and this is again these things don't just happen randomly there's a reason why this was happening in San Francisco and not happening in Tulsa or not or not happening in other cities around the country so we it when we have bad results like this it's really important to say okay what policies were in place that led to this and in California in San Francisco with what led to 23 Walgreens stores closing it's really easy to look at what you have to do is back in 2020 Gavin Newsom the governor signed a law all into signed a bill into law in California that had to do its shoplifting it essentially said that shoplifting anything under 950 dollars is considered a misdemeanor okay so usually when it comes to shoplifting just like an air in this state that I'm currently in the level that would determine shoplifting from Felony to misdemeanor is 500 so in my state if you shoplift 498 dollars it's going to be a misdemeanor if you shop below 501 it's going to be a felony okay so and and and it's almost half it's almost the level of of felony and so essentially the level for a felony in my state is pretty low it's it's twice as high so you could think about I mean you would really have to steal a lot of from Walgreens to get over 950 so I guess where I'm going with this is essentially almost every shoplifting offense in San Francisco was considered to be a misdemeanor okay so we have the bad or I'm going to say the bad law that makes most shopliftings Miss misdemeanors in California now we go to San Francisco specifically well the San Francisco police department in uh in um aligned with Progressive theories on how to control the city and how to prevent crime and how to uh how to um be a little more I guess pro-criminal is to they had a policy the San Francisco Police Department that any misdemeanor that the police officers unless there were extenuating circumstances they just weren't supposed to make arrests they're supposed to issue tickets or summonses or essentially no people don't show up to these summonses so it's essentially there's just you know police officers even if you were caught you weren't going to go to jail so essentially now we have this California law that makes almost all shoplifting a misdemeanor and then the specific policy for police officers in San Francisco that they really just can't take any enforcement action against most shopliftings and that's how this happened um but like I said San Francisco as much as I've just criticized it which is reasonable it's only fair to say that they've kind of been fighting back so the mayor London breed back just about a year ago in December of 2021 she ran on so she's very far left obviously she's the mayor of San Francisco she's not going to be a conservative very far left and she actually ran and was elected on a platform of defund the police well once she got in office in less than a year in office she realized all these things that I just said about crime being out of control about all these Walgreens closing and she saw that you know this is not a net good for the people who actually live here the regular normal citizens who just want to be able to go to Walgreens the senior citizens who live in San Francisco who want to be able to walk to the corner Walgreens store to get their prescription yeah they should be able to do that so London breed back in December of 21 she gave a speech and it was really an impassioned speech where she basically walked back all of the defund the police nonsense that she had ran at ran on she said they weren't going to do that that instead there was going to be the opposite she said there was going to be a crime Crackdown and she said that the reign of terror that criminals are putting on the city and the regular citizens is going to come to an end that's coming from the mayor of San Francisco about a year ago again someone who ran on and was elected on a defund the police platform so in order so the result had to be so bad for essentially her to admit hey these policies were a mistake we're going we're going to change it now it's absolutely fair for me to point out and for all of us to point out the bad policies but we should also acknowledge when politicians also acknowledge the policies are bad and are going to make a change also what San Francisco did and I can never say this guy's name Chessa boo boo Dwayne the progressive pro-criminal D.A he was up for a recall election this past June June of 2022 and he was actually recalled and fired from his job by the residents of San Francisco so all of these things you know San Francisco of the different cities who do have kind of you know Progressive policies that tend to lead to to predictably lead to more crime you know at least San Francisco seems like the vote voters are sick of it you know it's one of those things they always say that San Francisco is the most far left City I don't know if that's true or not but you know I think one of the reasons why we see this in San Francisco the voters and the mayor kind of changing course is because they pretty much hit rock bottom you know so once you've hit rock bottom you really don't have anywhere else to go and this is something that Adam Carolla on his show says all the time that why do we have to wait till we get get to Rock Bottom you know when we have record homicides in New York and Chicago and la and violent crime is out of control and the crime rates are the highest they've been in decades like why can't we make a change now like why do we have to wait till it hits rock bottom but it seems like San Francisco did hit that rock bottom and are doing something about it which is good um so let's see if we have any comments on that Nick the Oaky Nick says Oklahoma is fantastic I think I mentioned Tulsa yeah absolutely uh let's see we've got Sandy Bagwell in San Antonio uh let's see um uh let's see yeah so that's that's that's reasonable uh let's see uh red General red General District Court what do you think of the new uh table method cops are adapting taser assist baton lead enforcement um I don't know what that is so uh maybe you can put a link to it in there and I can see after the show I'm not sure exactly exactly what that is okay so you know so that's the Nancy Pelosi story um obviously we all we always Paul Pelosi a quick recovery and uh hopefully the criminal who did this any violent criminal no matter who the victim is should do years in prison and hopefully that is what happens here um I want to talk about a school shooting so there was a school shooting last Monday on October 24th that happened in St Louis and unlike other school shootings for some reason this one just didn't get a whole lot of national media attention so this was a 19 year old individual who went into a school in in St Louis and he was armed with a rifle and he shot nine people he actually killed two people a 15 year old student and a 61 year old teacher and then then seven other people were injured so there were nine people that were shot and you know this story just didn't get that much national attention and I'm really interested and curious in the comments is if maybe you know people can put in their what their thoughts are and why they think that might be the case um so a little bit of information on this so This 19 year old individual he did have some mental health problems um he was he police were called to his house multiple times for suicide attempts they were also called because and the the most interesting thing about this is that nine days before this happened so on on October um I believe it was October 15th his family called police because they found this exact rifle this exact gun they found it in the house and they didn't think that he was mentally competent enough to handle this gun so they called the place so the police got there and it's one of those things where the police kind of agreed but they really couldn't do a whole lot about it so you know if you're a 19 year old and you're legally able to own a gun if there's no other reason you're not in the moment you're not threatening to kill yourself or you're not threatening to harm anyone else there really just isn't a lot police officers can do so I know we've talked before about red flag laws but Missouri doesn't have a red flag log so even if police wanted to confiscate the gun like it just wouldn't have been legal for them to do so what happened was police officers essentially gave the firearm to another member of the family who didn't live with this individual and you know for them to hang on to the firearm but that it's in a legal order I mean essentially like even if the place wanted to that they can't just take someone's firearm it's just not something that they're able to legally do unless a crime's been committed or you know some states have laws where if someone is actively in the moment threatening suicide or threatening to um harm someone that might be a reason but just the family member saying hey this guy's not mentally stable and we don't think he should have a firearm there isn't a lot police can do so somehow the individual was able to get possession back of the firearm within nine days going to this school and do a and and do a school shooting kill two people um injure seven so nine shot total um with this there's a couple things so let's talk about the police response as much as we talked about the horrible and awful response from Uvalde during this officer involved shooting this is exactly how police officers should respond to officer-involved shooting so here's what happened within someone calling police police officers arrived on scene within four minutes a lot of the police officers who arrived on scene were off duty they were actually at a funeral for a retired police officer who had passed away they left the funeral in their just regular clothes and they all headed to the scene so on duty and off-duty police officers got to the scene within four minutes and instead of just sitting around and waiting around outside once they got there they did exact the right thing and they entered the school now this was a really big school it actually had three floors to it so when I say the time frame maybe it might sound kind of like a long time until they actually reach the gunman but if you think about it trying to clear a school and that has three stories to it um it's reasonable that it took this long so from the time they got on scene to they cleared the school and actually made contact with the shooter was eight minutes so within eight minutes of getting on seeing police officers were in a gunfight with the bad guy and within two minutes of starting that gun fight bad guy was dead so um the the police haven't said specifically whether or not it was their bullet who killed the bad guy or it was or if it was suicide they just said that the police did um engage in a gun fight with the individual and he was killed within two minutes so um again I I don't want to say that the police are responsible who did the good job in killing this guy or if he killed himself because that information just hasn't definitely been out there but we do know police got there quickly once there they went into the school immediately they searched out for the bad guy and they um engaged in a gunfight with him within eight minutes which is exactly what they were supposed to do so the response to this was was absolutely fantastic from law enforcement and but again this shooting just really have been covered so I look Kyle writtenhouse I'm going to compare it to Kyle Rittenhouse is because Kyle Rittenhouse was the exact same age I think maybe one year difference uh but just about the same age as this individual so Kyle Rittenhouse shot three people and he killed two of them just like this individual but this person the bad guy in this case he shot nine people three times as many people as Kyle Rittenhouse yet you're not going to see this case on the news on national news where they talk about it every single day you're not going to see um The View talk about it and disparage the shooter constantly and and you have to ask yourself why so I'm curious in the comments about why people might think that's the case is why a case like Kyle Rittenhouse case where it's obvious self-defense where he shot three people who were actively attacking him so the victims just weren't very sympathetic victims but in this case people in the school students and teachers inside of a school absolutely sympathetic victims so why is this case not being covered as much I think that's an important question to ask um okay so yeah so let's see uh Sergeant George first Columbine then Sandy Hook Rob Elementary and now the St Louis school shooting uh schools are suddenly turning into gigantic War zones yeah I think that's I think that's reasonable so statistically they are still pretty rare but we have to think about okay what can we do just on a policy or just on a reasonable level to stop some of these school shootings and it just seems like and we don't know how this individual entered the school so it just seems like the first thing to do is just make sure all doors out of school are locked I know that sounds simple but that's how they evolved a shooter got in and I'm not sure how this shooter got in there's been conflicting information but just make sure all doors are locked that seems like a pretty simple thing and then have armed police officers at the school are they going to be able to stop the school shooter every single time no especially on big schools could the police officer be in the gym and and a bad guy come into a different building in the school yes so an armed police officer that's not a cure-all but just having someone on scene I don't see how anyone thinks that that is a bad idea so those are some of the things that I think we we might be able to do um just on a reasonable just policy level just to try to protect schools um but again this was this is a tragedy but the police response was exactly how we want police to respond to active Shooters uh someone has a question about uh the Daniel Santi has a question about Fabian Gonzalez sentencing in New Mexico that's a really good question so I'll do that really quick so for those of you who don't know of uh this was the case in Albuquerque New Mexico um that happened a few years ago um the short version is is that Victoria Martens was a 10 year old girl who was killed um she was killed by Fabian Gonzalez was an individual he met uh Michelle Martens who is was Victoria's mother they met on a dating app within a few weeks of knowing each other they started to live together essentially Fabian Gonzalez moved into an apartment in Albuquerque that was shared by Victoria Martens and um and uh uh Michelle Martins they started doing drugs together then Fabian Gonzalez's horrible cousin Jessica Kelly who has a violent history and was always on drugs and meth she gets out of prison she starts to hang out over there well there was one evening right around just right around Victoria Martin's 10th birthday where Fabian Gonzalez and the the mother Michelle Martins they went out looking for drugs while they were out looking for drugs um tragically Victoria Martens was was killed in a pretty horrific fashion inside the apartment and the only one there was Jessica Kelly once Fabian Gonzalez and the mother got back Victoria Martin's body was set on fire it was dismembered it was absolutely horrible police officers arrested all three of those individuals Fabian Gonzalez the mother and and Jessica Kelly who was there when um uh who was there when Victoria Martens was tragically killed so Fabian Gonzalez was just sentenced in Albuquerque yesterday he was said he was found guilty of essentially creating a situation that would lead for there to be a situation where there was the death of a child endangerment of a child and he was sentenced to 37 years yesterday so my thoughts on that are good that is absolutely fantastic uh the judge uh Cindy Leos she made some really good comments and she said that yes that even though Fabian Gonzalez wasn't physically present when Victoria was killed he helped to create a situation that made it likely that there could be violence against Victoria Martens um and I agree with the judge 100 so um that's an awful horrible tragic case but um it is but it is um it is a a good legal outcome I believe that uh Fabian Gonzalez got 37 years uh the mother got 12 to 15 years because they needed her testimony and then uh Jessica yeah 37 and a half for Fabian and then uh I believe that Victor uh Jessica Kelly got around 44 years or so um so thank you for asking about that particular case it's a case that should be a national story because of how how horrific it was um uh so I know that we talked about Uvalde last week and we always kind of we always kind of talk about talk about Uvalde um uh let's see uh if you are a real cop I love you as long as you ain't liberal well I mean I don't okay again I don't like to just criticize people just because they're you know conservative or liberal I think it's way more interesting to criticize policy because I think we can all look both Democrats and Republicans have good policies and bad policies and I think it's really that's the more interesting and honest conversation is to say let's look at this policy and see what are the likely results and then have our arguments there um but thank you Chet um let's see uh okay so Uvalde um so uh Stephen McCraw is the chief of police the head of the Texas Department of Public Safety you'll remember him because he was the one who was essentially right after the Uvalde shooting he was speaking on behalf of the government because the the governor is the one because the governor was the one who um appoints the chief of the Texas Department of Public Safety so he gave a lot of the briefings and a lot of the information that Steve McCraw gave to the media in these initial briefings like right after you've all they happened the information just ended up not being true and at the time I remember saying well okay well we don't know is he purposely saying things that aren't true or was this just such a boondoggle just such a mess that he doesn't know and he's just trying to give the best information that he can um I think I even said at the time on a lie that you know if he's saying something that isn't true you know there's body cameras there's surveillance video so if Mr McCraw Chief Macross saying something that's not true like this is going to come out and it's going to be obvious that he wasn't telling the truth so um the idea that he was lying about stuff just doesn't make a whole lot of sense I think it's I think especially when it comes to government officials I think to always assume someone's lying probably isn't correct it's more likely that they just didn't know or that it's incompetence um I think that's usually the way to go but there was a public meeting a public safety commission hearing um yesterday in Austin Texas that Steve mccrod gave a 15-minute speech at after the public hearing people mostly family members of victims in Uvalde were talking about it where we're um we're able to ask him questions and basically what they wanted was for a Steve McCraw to resign and they kept asking that he'd be terminated and that he resigned from his position one of the reasons is that Steve McCraw he gave a public statement that basically said that if during the investigation during this internal investigation that if there's any way that Texas Department of Public Safety failed the community he said I should go so he basically said that he should resign and be held responsible if any member of the Texas Department of Public Safety fail the public well since then you know we've had some more information we know that they fired Sergeant the highest ranking Texas um Department of Public Safety member he's a sergeant a sergeant he was on scene you know he was one of the ones who had given an order to not go in and he was um he was fired um recently there was also a commander with the Texas State Police who also was terminated for his role in the response of Uvalde so there has been some problems there also from new surveillance video and body camera footage that is has just come out we know that at one point there were 91 members of the Texas Department of Public Safety who were on scene and some of them actually arrived and were physically there on scene within 10 minutes of when the call of when the call came in so it's one of those things that um it's it's one of those things that uh yes there have been some calls for him to him to resign and um I think they're I think they're reasonable and people are obviously pissed off um at this meeting there were Representatives both Republicans and Democrats who were elected representatives who were asking for Mr Mr McCraw to resign from his position as the Texas head of the Department of Public Safety now we have to think about this as reasonably as we can and that this is an election year so right now there is an election Governor Abbott is going up against beta O'Rourke and it looks like Governor Abbott is going to win but since you know the governor is the one who appoints the head of the Texas Department of Public Safety a couple before the election yet you absolutely uh Chief McCraw is not going to resign that politically that just wouldn't make any sense now once the election is over because that essentially would be an admission of failure and then beta would be able to use that so we have to think about all of this when it comes to politics because that's when that's when these things are likely going to happen so once the election is over Governor Abbott is likely going to be re-elected at that point I absolutely could save chief for chief macro retiring or resigning at that point but um probably not going to happen anytime before that um also I you know I've on my on my Tick Tock where I post I post a lot of a lot of things um I've been posting a lot about um this just stop oil so I don't know how many people are familiar with this but just stop oil is essentially this far left maniacal group of environmental activists and what they do is they like to do things that for lack of a better term just annoy regular people and they try to disrupt things why they think this is going to be convincing I'm not sure but here's a little bit of a recap of some of the things they've been doing so in London they went a van Gogh um in London at an art gallery there's a sun file a very famous sunflower Van Gogh painting they took cans of tomato soup and they threw it on the van Gogh painting now the van Gogh painting is under glass so there's no permanent damage but you know it's it's irritating and then what they do is they um glue themselves to the wall right underneath the painting so they did that then in Germany there was a painting by Monet that they um threw mashed potatoes on they've also been going to car dealerships uh Bugatti Ferrari and Bentley and they've been spray painting the outside and these videos have been all over and just stop oil the the group that's in charge of this that you know they're all do they all have shirts on that they just stop oil you know I mean they're they're promoting this you can follow them it's amazing who on Twitter I know that Elon Musk just took over Twitter we might talk about that in a little bit but it's amazing of it's in all of these let me get my thoughts together all of these things are crimes this is all criminal activity we can all agree maybe it's low-level criminal activity but it's still criminal actions and it's amazing who's allowed on Twitter for saying things that people who's kicked off of Twitter for just saying things that people don't like as opposed to people committing actual crimes because if you follow like I do uh just stop oil on Twitter like they post all of these things they're posting their own videos and they haven't been kicked off the platform not saying that they should be kicked off the platform but it's just amazing that you know them promoting criminal activity that's fine to be on Twitter and people who just say things that people find offensive those kinds of people are kicked off Twitter so uh the the comparison there is what a lot of people are irritated about um so also what just stop oil has been doing is they've been um blocking traffic and and stuff like that you know and that just makes it difficult for police officers and ambulances and fire trucks to get through I just want to say that you know and when it comes to the environment it's very possible that reasonable people a normal reasonable people might have some concerns about the environment like that isn't that isn't an unreasonable position to just look at this and say and just to have questions about it or to think that it's at least somewhat important where I'm going with this is that there are some people who are reasonable maybe even on the right side of the aisle who on a policy level might actually agree not completely because these people are nuts but you know might actually agree on a little bit when it comes to a policy level with the with just stop oil on some things but when you do things like this like block traffic like spray paint random car dealerships or throw mashed potatoes on on famous paintings when you do things like this you discuss and just alienate people it's almost like they said hey how can we make these people who might agree with us on some policy level how can we get them to just despise us on a personal level I know several people who are more on the left side of the aisle and you know after I've posted these videos they've reached out to me and they've said things like you know I would never support a group like this or vote for our candidate that a group like this wanted me to just because I just can't stand these tactics so so what do you think that I did so none of this makes any sense I just I just don't understand what they're doing I'm not sure how many people I'm not sure how many people uh yes Duke City gaming uh glue yourself to the poor showroom floor yes exactly that's the kind of stuff that they uh that they have been doing um you know and I don't know how many people listen to this podcast it's the Patrick Bet David podcast pdb podcast it's unbelievable I listen all the time because he asks really hard and good questions to everybody um but what Patrick Bet David had on the two women females I don't know if I can still say that or not but you know if they died and their bones were dug up 500 years from now everyone would say that they that it was a it was a female that if um uh Patrick Beck David had two of these women on um they were 20 years old and he asked them some hard questions and it's pretty sad it's it's just it's obvious that they're just being used by this company um this group just stopped oil and that they really don't know what they're talking about so um again I just think it's an interesting issue it's been happening everywhere most of it has been happening in Europe but I'm sure it's going to come over here and I think that we all find it just absolutely disgusting when people especially block traffic that's the most irritating thing uh let's see Sergeant George says show-offs that's all they are yeah yeah exactly because what they're doing really isn't making anything better if you're concerned about the environment Why not pick up trash Why not pick up litter why not go clean up a beach like these are some reasonable thing if you're concerned about the environment and you say I'm going to spend all Saturday morning and I'm gonna go clean up garbage in a park that's reasonable we would all say great thank you for doing that you know and then maybe they might get some supports but I guess that just isn't as much fun as throwing mashed potatoes on on a Monet uh let's see while they ride bikes uh let's see um yeah uh and they ride bikes that were made by gas and oil and I'm just going to tell a personal story here real quick on this so um I have a I have a family friend who I've been friends with since I was I was a little kid again it's a family friend and you know about 15 years ago they got she got married and it was a green wedding okay so someone comment and tell me if I'm thinking about this wrong but it was a it was a green wedding it was in the Chicagoland area that's where everyone was from and the wedding was at a state park about two hours from Chicago so everyone you know 150 200 people essentially had to drive from Chicago to the state park two hours away for a green wedding and they made such a big deal about how it was a green green wedding and reused flowers I made that up I don't know I wasn't really paying attention but you know it was all vegetarian food and this is a whole big deal about how it was a green wedding but again literally 200 people had to drive two hours each way in order to get there and it just seems like the gas emissions to get to this green wedding um were just pretty silly um as opposed to what they were trying to accomplish so I I just thought that was always a contradiction there but maybe I'm wrong maybe someone could put it in the chat another interesting another interesting case that we covered a couple times was the Daryl Brooks case the mass murderer in Waukesha Wisconsin so his circus trial finally came to an end so um he was charged you know he killed he drove his red SUV through a Christmas parade in Waukesha Wisconsin last year he killed six people injured 62. he represented himself in court the whole thing has been an absolute mess I've talked about the last couple weeks just because it is just such a circus he gets in shouting matches with judges and then he has to be put into a different room he's a sovereign citizen I mean this thing has just everything if they did a movie about Dahmer they should really do a movie about this guy too because it's absolutely absolutely crazy um but he was convicted of over 70 charges so um I think it was 76 he's also a rap star um he uh they played some of his rap videos in in in the trial it was absolutely just it's again it's wild stuff um uh and um so he was convicted of I think 76 charges and found guilty on just about everything um yeah you could find some of his since they I mean it's really interesting what Spotify has decided to do with this they essentially got rid of Kanye and they're putting all of Daryl Brooks stuff in there instead so um that that's that's that's interesting um but he was found guilty of the 70 charges um as he was being sentenced one of the the victims family members yelled out in court you know rotten hell you piece of which is I think a lot of what people um were thinking someone did an individually got kicked out of court of course because the judge has to you know maintain um courtroom rules and stuff like that but I think that's um absolutely appropriate um and this should once and for all I went over what Sovereign citizens are last last week so I'm not gonna do that again but this should once and for all just be a case study of how the Sovereign citizen defense first of all how stupid it is and how it doesn't work it's not a real thing it's ridiculous it's like Scientology like it's not real okay so anytime any police officers on here or anyone you know has the unfortunate um instance of meeting a sovereign citizen just play them some of this Daryl Brooks tape and you'll be able to see that hey this stuff actually does not work in a real court of law maybe in an imaginary court of law and some kind of a fantasy but in the real world The Sovereign citizen defense absolutely does not work so his sentencing I believe on Monday of next week they're going to have another another Court setting and at that point I don't think he's going to be sentenced on that date but they're going to at least and they're at least going to um they're at least going to say um uh when the sentencing is and the judge should set a date um and I what this just reminds me of how many people watched It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia but Charlie fancies himself to be the the greatest bird lawyer in the United States and you're listening to some of Daryl Brooks arguments reminds me of Charlie from It's Always Sunny so my favorite episodes of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia are the the episodes where they're in court and they have trials I think it's absolutely great sometimes I have my kids who ones 13-1-7 sometimes in order to settle a dispute I'll have a mock trial not like I learned in law school but you know really with the same rules that they employ and Always Sunny in Philadelphia because I think that's reasonable um let's see if anybody has comments about some of this stuff uh okay okay we'll see uh hey Jeff uh Jeff Menifee uh tearing up a city is not the way to express things uh when Brianna Taylor Anthony happens in Louisville almost all of downtown was destroyed and looted yeah that's that's a good point um I'm not sure what the comp was in reference to but um yeah I I don't I I I've said this before I don't under if a police officer commits a crime which wasn't the case in the Brianna Taylor shooting at least when it comes to the the use of force but when a police officer does something wrong or commits a crime um it seems like the public should want that police officer to be held accountable to me it seems strange to go to random buildings downtown that are owned by like local grocery stores and to uh burn down a local grocery store because you're mad about something that a police officer did to me that doesn't make any sense um if someone can explain that logic to me um uh if someone can explain it a lot to me I'd love to hear it Sergeant George says I've never had any time to watch It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia well sir you should make time it is an unbelievable show it is extremely funny so now we go on to New York City and I've covered this a couple times before but in this past week New York City had something happen again another random person was pushed onto the subway tracks and I say random so it's not like this was like a domestic violence situation or there was a a dispute over business that went bad or people were people were were arguing like I you know I always imagine a Seinfeld where you know Kramer's trying trying to get into the subway car and he's getting into fights with people it wasn't anything like that like literally a person just standing there and a random offender running up to him and pushing him in so this happened again this past week luckily this individual survived but in New York City this is the 25th time that this has happened this year two of them have actually been fatal um this individual that that they found he was in custody the police were able to arrest him based on the surveillance video um they do have many costumes obviously you know he's been arrested like you know 200 times this is a career Criminal Who we can all objectively you know not even looking at what he looks like or anything like that just read the list of crimes he's been charged with and convict of and say yeah this person should not be in society with everybody else that's this guy um so luckily he didn't kill this individual but it's a scary thing to be pushed in front of a subway car um so I and that leads me to just a couple things so I talked about public policy earlier and how public policy especially when it comes to criminal justice and crime just has very predictable results so one of the things that New York City did is they implemented broken windows back in the 90s now broken windows was a crime control theory that was created by someone named James Q Wilson in 1982 and just the base level what it is is that minor signs of social Decay like broken windows minor signs of social Decay and disorder can contribute to an atmosphere where crime is allowed and happens um that's basically what it is no other way to phrase it is if you if you enforce and take care of the Small Things the big things will take care of of themselves and the best way that I can describe this and the best example is New York City under Rudy Giuliani you know before he was working for Trump and had the the hair dye running down his face and he was silly um when Rudy Giuliani was like you know a very serious person as the mayor of New York he hired a really smart guy Bill Bratton as the chief of police and between 1990 and 1996 they ran this broken windows they ran this broken windows type crime and they went after what they call quality of life crime so especially in the subway system people who were jumping turnstiles so just not paying to get in and just jumping through drinking in public urinating in public disorderly conduct so all of these that I guess we would consider smaller crimes quality of life crimes the enforcement on that was ramped up if they saw you doing it it was like everybody gets arrested there are no there are no Second Chances we catch you jump in a turnstile you're going to jail now that might sound sound harsh but what they found you know basically the data through seven years of doing this what they found is that the end it's really difficult for police officers to catch someone right before or prevent right before someone pushes someone to a subway tracks or before someone is robbed at gunpoint or before there there's a violin assault it's really difficult because if people see police officers they're not going to do those kinds of things right in front of them so it's really difficult for police officers to catch people committing these violent felonies but what they found is that well it really isn't that important to catch people doing the violent felonies as long as we get those people into custody for something and they found that the same people shockingly the same people who were committing the violent offenses were the exact same group of people who were committing these minor offenses so anytime someone jumped to turnstile and the police called him immediately they were arrested and went to jail these are called quality of life issues and crimes that were enforced to an unbelievable degree so the case that I talked about um this past week that happened in New York city so the one or the ways the individual and I'm not saying that this would have absolutely prevented it but right before the individual pushed the guy onto the tracks he jumped the turnstile in order to get in so that's pretty much just an example of that now it's so okay so and we talk about these are the policies that were that were put in place but what were the results well from 1990 to 1996 when broken windows was implemented and chief Bill Bratton was in New York City implementing these these um this crime control really heavy Crackdown on small minor quality of life crimes violent crimes and felonies went down 40 percent and the murder rate was cut in half here's what I mean by that in the year 1990 there were just over 2 600 murders in New York City by 1996 when Bill Bratton retired there were just over 1300 murders literally the murder rate was caught cut in half now the correlation isn't always causation so I'm not saying it was just broken windows but really it's a set of multiple different policies the main one the base level Theory and philosophy being broken windows of why this occurred so you know we I've talked before about black lives matter and I think black lives do man better every life matters we should want to save as many people as possible so if we look at the numbers in New York City on a yearly basis who are the victims of who are the murder victims so who's actually being killed in New York City and even though African Americans only make up about 15 percent of the population in New York City they represent 67 percent of people who are the victims of homicide in New York city so if we take the number from 1990 to uh to um uh 1996. you know 1300 people 1300 lives every year were saved well 67 percent of that is 838 so essentially this broken windows policy every year that it was implemented it saved over 800 black lives and it just seems like if we really care about saving people this is the kind of thing that we should be doing and the kind of policies that we should be implementing because in every city and every population there are predators and there are criminals we need to take those criminals out of society throw them in jail so the other 99 of us can just live normal lives and we can go into Walgreens and we can go to the subway without having to worry about being pushed in or being robbed in the subway uh let's see Duke City gaming where is all the money they made uh well they're a black lives matter um is being investigated by um all kinds of attorney generals um and this uh there's going to be some criminal charges coming down absolutely uh let's see they've also made some uh they've also bought uh several different uh multi-million dollar Mansions um so that's those are the main cases that I want to talk about let's see uh any other comments any other comments here let's see no other comments so those were the cases that I uh let's see talk about the lieutenant being reinstated uh after Okay um so don't have any other comments or any other questions um let's see no nothing else so I mean those are the cases that I want to go over it's a really interesting week for crime like I said the main story was that Paul Pelosi's story so um you know we'll definitely track that one as it goes on and um yeah that's gonna just about wrap it up for today so please make sure if you haven't already to subscribe to Cops and cons TV also if you want to go ahead and follow me on police law news I also started writing on substack at police law newsletter if you want to go ahead and subscribe there but I hope everyone has a great and safe weekend thanks very much
Danger Zone
This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.