When Charlie Kirk was shot and killed in Utah, millions were quick to call it a tragedy of political violence. >> I hate Charlie Kirk. I hate him. I hate him. I hate him. I hate him. >> But here's the controversial question nobody wants to touch. Did his own rhetoric play a role in his fate? >> Kirk made a career out of confrontation. >> You are a self-described feminist. What is a woman? From calling out professors on his watch list to telling young women careers don't matter as much as family, his words hit hard and divided audiences. Supporters say he was just telling the truth. Critics argue he fueled the same culture of anger that eventually turned on him. So, was he simply a victim of hate? Or did the fire he spread come back to burn him? Love him or hate him, Charlie Kirk's death forces us to ask, where does free speech end and where does dangerous rhetoric begin?