This incident exposes blatant police overreach when a man is detained for legally filming on a public sidewalk. Officers demand ID based on a vague belief, not lawful suspicion, until his calm, firm pushback leaves them with no choice but to back down in embarrassment. Okay, where do the state grounds start? I'm not sure, but I know you're on them. Okay, so publicly accessible sidewalk in a publicly accessible area. There's no signs that says it's state grounds anywhere. If you're asking me to leave, I will leave. Do you have any identification? Uh, have I committed a crime? I'm a civil rights activist. Okay, I'm not going to I'm not going to let somebody trump on my civil rights. I have not committed a crime, so I don't have to show ID. You have to articulate a reasonable suspicion of a crime. I believe you're on parole and you're in possession of a firearm. I am not. And but but your belief is not a crime. >> ID so that I can So your belief is not a crime. We can't let you leave the property without knowing your name and address. Okay, I'll walk off property. I have not committed a crime. I do not have to show ID because I have not committed a crime, nor am I in suspicion of committing a crime. Just cuz you believe >> a suspect. Belief is not a crime. Okay, so there is no reason for me to present you with an ID. It's because I'm hiding anything, it's because of the fact that I'm not going to let my rights be trumped. I fought and died for my So I'm going to proceed off property like I've been told to. Gentlemen, have a nice day. You, too.