A police chief stopped a man accusing him of vandalism just for placing signs on DOT land and demanded his license to issue a citation. When he refused, the chief threatened arrest for obstruction. But once the truth came out that the landowner had placed the signs, the case collapsed, exposing the chief's baseless power trip. >> I need your driver's license cuz I'm going to make a report. >> But I don't have a driver's license on me. I'm just working here, man. I'm doing my job. >> You put your signs up? >> I did not put the signs up, but I'm here for the signs. If there's an investigation, I'm not I'm not willing to cooperate with you. >> If you don't start giving me some information, I'll hook you up and take you downtown for resistant lay obstruct my investigation. All I need is a name. Hold on. It's that simple. >> If if you're investigating me, don't I have the right to remain silent? >> I haven't read you your rights. You told me, did you put the signs up? You said yes and started recording on your phone. You told me that you just admitted to printing the signs on DOT. >> And now I'm trying to correct that by saying I misunderstood your question. >> I need to know who put them up. >> That was the property owner. >> Okay. Where are they at? >> They just rand out to their home and they will be back in 15 minutes. >> Then who is it? >> The signs. >> Do you have your driver's license? >> I do. >> Okay. >> I got a call. >> Okay, I will. I appreciate it.