An officer stopped a man, accusing him of unsafe passing without clear evidence. When the driver calmly demanded proof, the cop grew hostile and even cursed at him. But moments later, the tables turned. The man exposed the officer's lack of professionalism and proved what the law actually says. >> You said, "I've been detained. You need to articulate to me what it is the law that I violated." Sir, >> it's an unsafe pass to the left. It may not feel unsafe to you, but the person you pass that didn't see you coming, it might be unsafe to them, causing them. So now, so now the law is is subjective to the to the to the observer. >> No, it's >> that's exactly what you just said, sir. You said it might not be unsafe to you, but it's safe to someone else. That's called relative not safe to you. In your perception, it might not be >> Exactly. So it's subjective to somebody's perception. >> You're not the only one driving out here. There are more drivers than >> So the law is now subjective to perception of the individual. I passed at 5 mph. I had plenty of room to shoot lane share. Okay. >> And I was within the confines of the lane. I wasn't anywhere near the edge of the left. I completely disagree with you, sir. >> I don't want to see it again. You're free to go. >> I would Can you apologize to me for cursing at me, too? Do you even care that you're violating people's constitutional rights?