Police confronted a man over nothing more than a neighbor's complaint, demanding ID without any sign of a crime. When he invoked his constitutional rights and refused, officers escalated with threats of arrest, forcing him to comply under duress and exposing their abuse of power. >> Trying to investigate this this complaint that happened, right? >> You got called here. We need to identify people and make sure nothing happened. Okay. >> But there's no crime committed. I do not need to identify. This is not identifiable. State. This is a police investigation and that doesn't matter involved in I can pull up the case law right now if you want. >> You have to identify yourself if you're involved in something. >> No. If I commit a crime, it's not interfering if I didn't do anything physical. >> Need your name and your date of birth. >> No, you don't. >> And if you were some random person not involved in this, you don't have to give us your name. That is correct. However, you're involved in some sort of incident that we're investigating. Therefore, you need to provide your name. That's how it works. Otherwise, it's you interfering with our investigation. >> Interference is a physical act. That's not true. >> No, he called and I came down and I didn't commit a crime. >> Don't identify yourself. You're going to jail. I'm getting my ID under threat of arrest.