Channel operation
Preparing…
Starting…
- Elapsed time
- 0s
- Estimated remaining
- Estimating…
No changes saved yet.
Keep this page open while work is running. Estimates change with channel size; leaving may interrupt unsaved work.
View resultsTranscript Details
- Language
- en
- Format
- text
- Source
- scrappa
- Auto-generated
- Yes
- Confidence
- N/A
- Created
- 2026-10-22 15:58
Transcript Content
Watch as this cop pulled him over on a vague claim and immediately started fishing. But unfortunately for him, he picked the wrong guy who knew the law better than he thought. >> What' you pull me over for? >> Just curious. I saw you behind me. I couldn't tell. >> You turned your emergency lights on and pulled me over because you were curious. What statute is that? >> Suspicious activity, sir. >> What was the suspicious activity? >> I asked what you were doing out there, sir. >> I'm not going to answer any questions. >> So, why are you asking me questions? >> Because you're a public servant. Why did you pull me over? Cuz I took your picture. >> I couldn't tell what you were doing, sir. Well, then you pulled me over because you couldn't tell what I was doing. >> Because it was suspicious activity. I asked to talk to a supervisor. >> Yeah, this guy pulled me over for suspicious activity. What statute is that? >> It's not a statute, sir. It's a >> So, he's pulling me over for a nonviolation. >> Well, when you're in an area where an officer is conducting a traffic stop and you have something in your hand, it's kind of a dangerous world we live in right now. It's certainly within the law of film. You just have to do it in a way that isn't going to cause concern with regards to an officer's safety. >> No. Supreme Court already ruled on this. It doesn't interfere with officer safety. Okay, we don't have anything else right
Danger Zone
This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.