I need to determine who you are, so I can call a property owner and find out if you're allowed to be here. >> How would you know who the property owner is? >> I can call the county and find out who owns the property. >> Why don't you do that? >> I need to identify you first. >> I'm on private property. >> You know what? And you're going to see me. You've just looked at my minivan. Now you're going to see me on this street and I know you're going to give me a ticket, you dumb you dumb You know why I'm in this country? Cuz you're a mother with a gun, right? And we got to [ __ ] up your Did you guys get to become doctors? >> This encounter started when an officer approached a man on private property and immediately began demanding answers about why he was there. The officer claimed he needed to identify him before determining whether he even had a right to be on the property. And when the man refused to play along, the situation quickly turned into a heated confrontation over property rights and police authority. The legal dispute centered on whether the officer had any legitimate reason to demand identification or continue investigating without evidence that a crime had occurred. But as the conversation continued, the officer kept making assumptions that would come back to haunt him. What he didn't realize was that he had picked the absolute worst person to challenge that day. And by the time the truth came out, the entire encounter had completely flipped on its head. >> This young gentleman Go ahead, ask the question. >> Do you have permission to be on the property? >> And what would you do if I don't answer that question? You You What did you just say? You have the right to do what? >> I have the right to investigate further whether or not you belong on this property. >> And how would you do that? >> I would contact the property owner. >> Why don't you do that? >> I will. >> Thank you. >> But first of all, I need you to identify yourself as part of the investigation. >> This is private property. >> Yes, it is and you're on it. >> What's your badge number, sir? >> 160 >> 160 >> Yes. >> Okay, so 911 call is irrelevant because I didn't call 911, okay? >> No, it's irrelevant cuz I'm here and now you're here and I don't know if you have the right to be on this property. It's a house under construction. Are you Do you belong to this house? >> Why don't you call the property owner? >> I need to determine who you are, so I can call the property owner and find out if you're allowed to be here or not. >> How would you know who the property owner is? >> I can call the county and find out who owns the property. >> Why don't you do that? >> I need to identify you first. >> I'm on private property. >> Okay. You should And if you shouldn't be on private property, then you're trespassing. >> Thank you. So, why don't you determine that? >> Well, I can determine >> There's If you call the property owner. >> Okay. Well, then I need to detain you then. >> The property owner, is that correct? >> rights to be on the property. >> So, you're going to You're going to first identify me? >> Yes. >> So, So, you are going to first identify me? >> Yes. >> Right? And then what do you plan to do? This is a This is a private This is private property, sir. I I would like you to leave. >> Do you own the property? >> I would This is This is private What did you just say? >> You You don't own this property. >> And what did you say to that answer of that question that you just answered yourself? >> What? >> You just answered that question yourself. >> leaving the property. >> You need to get off my property, sir. >> What? >> You need to get off my property. >> No, I'm not. >> You need to get off my property. >> No, I'm not. >> You need to get off my property. Why are you not getting off my property? Let's go, bro. Let's go inside my house. Let's go inside. >> Cuz all I needed was for you to confirm that. >> And I know you're both people are going to come back here. Get the off my land. Okay? >> I I just >> And I told you to get the >> But I didn't know whether or not you belonged here, and then you confirmed that. >> You didn't have to do that before you called. >> it was somebody else on your property? What if it was somebody else that was on your property? >> You are such a loser. Nobody gives a about you, okay? Nobody and I feel threatened. My my civil rights are threatened by the state of California by this Who's shocked at look at him. Look at you. I'm not calming down. You know what? And you're going to see me. You've just looked at my minivan that you're going to see me on this street and I know you're going to give me a ticket, you dumb You dumb You know why I'm in this country? Cuz you're a mother with a gun, right? And we got to [ __ ] up your cuz you guys can't become doctors and with that money we buy your land back. And I'll tell you what I'm souped up on. You I'm going to go show you my van, too. Okay, so you can inspect it, okay? >> So this is what? >> This is the we got here. >> This is the 911 call. >> You should have seen my son when the when the Russians came on. He said, "Get off my land." It was hilarious. And the guy and the guy ran off. >> Yeah. >> All right. All right, now let's let's go inside. I'll show you why I'm so souped up, okay? Let's go. Let's go, okay? Let's go into my van. Let's go. Let's go. No, let's go. I want this on the video. No, no, it's going to be hilarious. No, I I'm going to make more fun of you. Come on, let's go. You know what it is, dude? It's 500 calories of M&M's, dude. Get the off this land. You come again, I'm calling the police, okay? There's a man with a gun who has a right to call more white men with a gun on land that has been seceded from this great state of California. This is our Das Acres land and this mother going to get off. Okay? Sayonara. >> The biggest problem in this encounter was that the officer appeared more interested in identifying the man than verifying the basic facts. If ownership was the key issue, checking property records or contacting the owner before escalating the situation would have been the logical first step. Instead, the The treated the homeowner as a potential trespasser while standing on the homeowner's own property. Based on the facts, the homeowner was exercising his property rights and repeatedly challenged the officer to verify ownership through available records. Once the officer learned he was dealing with the actual owner, the justification for continuing the confrontation largely disappeared. Rather than conducting a thorough investigation first, the officer seemed to work backward from the assumption that the man needed to prove himself. By the end, that approach completely backfired, leaving the homeowner in control of the encounter and the officer looking unprepared and embarrassed.