show me your hands you better not show me your hands you better not okay don't be reaching move don't you don't be stepping up on me get away from me sir don't touch me the interaction began with an officer detaining a citizen filming a public area near a police station the officer physically grabbed the individual's arm despite repeated objections and requests to stop under terv Ohio an officer may only detain someone if there is reasonable suspicion of a specific crime filming in public as reaffirmed Med in Glick versus auni is not a crime and is protected under the First Amendment the officer however insisted the detention was lawful citing suspicious Behavior though no evidence of a crime was presented why because I asked you to okay are please don't touch me I asked you to have a seat please don't touch me sir I asked you to have a seat please have a seat are you stopping me for some reason yes I am for what reason because you guys are photographing the police department okay is that a crime I want to find out what's going on please get that out why are you detaining me well please stop touching my arm okay I asked you to help right now you are assaulting me I'm not assaulting you you are assaulting me you're touching my arm and you're not allowed to please have a seat why are you assaulting me right now please have a seat why are you assaulting me right now why are you assaulting me right now what is your name I'm asking you to have a seat I'm asking you for your name that wasn't me please get your hand off of me sir right now this is a I've asked you to stop several times you can be arrested right now hold on one stay right now I'm being assaulted can we can we talk you're not being assaulted we can absolutely talk as soon as I am not being assaulted by this man please tell him to get his hand off of me listen to me I would be happy listen to me first am to you are not free to go you are being detain this officer is giving you a lawful command please just listen what's the big deal sit down right um this is also being in video so please yeah he said we're not free to go please please listen to his please do not touch me okay sir do are you making sir you're being detained and I'm not sure why yet I don't officer is given you a lawful command he's detaining you are you making are you making a legal determination that you have the authority to do this right now sir sir I'm asking you politely to please comply why am I being forced to comply I'm on a public sidewalk being detained do you have any of what you call probable cause hey Tom Tom yes do you want this guy sitting okay sir you being detain I don't know let's figure that out is there any CA being given a command a lawful command to comply and what is your evidence of jurisdiction to give me a lawful order sir you are being detained are people not allowed to be on this please do not touch me come on I will sit down if you get your hand off of me down you haven't sat down yet get the camera out of my face and sit down stop assaulting me sit down stop assaulting me hold on stop assaulting I was fine and no I would like you to not touch me we'll talk over here the situation escalated when officers physically forced the individual to comply with one officer grabbing the person's arm and another threatening arrest for non-compliance under Graham versus Connor the use of force by law enforcement must be objectively reasonable based on the situation here the individual was not resisting or threatening the officers but was repeatedly assaulted and coerced into sitting down the officer's actions disregarded legal stand standards with one admitting they were acting on suspicious circumstances rather than lawful grounds okay I would like to not be assaulted you feel safer if he stayed with us I want to know I want to know first off why are you telling me that I'm not free to go hold on I'm sorry let me let me interrupt real quick go ahead talk to me I want to know why are you why are you telling me that I am not free to go what is what is your supposed probable cause and are you making a legal determination that you have theur to order me to do something sir the problem we have is that we have uh suspicious circumstances where we got we got people you know uh recording vehicles in our parking lot so um it is it is all we want to know is find out you know what what's going on here and what your your purpose is that's all it is um my purpose is to photograph if and if you don't want to sit down you don't have to sit down okay great so I want to know why I'm being assaulted and threatened by people no I have been assaulted twice and I'm going to let you know that your police training your so-called training should prevent you from assaulting people who are not being accused of a crime okay so like I said the only concern we have is that it's kind of suspicious kind of odd uh walking up to our police department and uh up directly up to our gate and taking video and pictures of our vehicles and equipment and our Police Department in general I understand that it is not against the law I understand that it may be unusual okay however that is not my concern my concern is merely to go about my business and I am not here to answer questions I am not being detained under any supposed law that is being broken and all I want to do is talk to you about what's going on that's all it is Sir okay well all I want to do you're not any trouble or anything like that but all I want to do I want to make sure that that uh there is no uh if you have any concerns I also want to make sure that that we're going to be safe that's my concern is that you have two officers that assaulted me sir we also have the right to talk to you you don't have the right to assault me do you mind if uh if I if I can see your ID sir I'm not here to answer any questions I'm not going to testify okay all right hold on the officer's justifications for their actions highlighted a lack of understanding of lawful detention suspicious Behavior alone does not meet the probable cause standard required under the fourth amend Amendment as established in Illinois versus Gates when pressed for evidence of probable cause the officers failed to articulate any specific legal violation instead deflecting to claims of Duty and security concerns their inability to provide a clear legal basis undermined their Authority and exposed their misconduct T pay is the man who assaulted me we're allowed to film in public aren't we this man also assaulted me what is your name Bishop Bishop Bishop did Bishop assault you yes are you guys recording body [Music] cam hello my name is Sergeant clug can I talk to you real quick without a camera in my face please the camera will be staying on you can keep it on I don't care just not write up in my face what's your first name I'm not here to answer questions sir okay well you're free to go at this point I apologize if you feel that you were treated on properly but my officers do have a duty to do their job and to find out what's going on there's you know there's a lot of Terror ISM in this in the country right now that we're concerned with we don't know that you're involved with terrorism so that's why we we contacted you and had a chat with you okay I would like to know why this person assaulted me I have no idea well I I would Poss because you weren't being cooperative and we have a right to detain people when we see suspicious circumstances we deemed this suspicious circumstances you were detained so it's a legal detention if you don't think it was legal detention feel free to get an attorney and talk to him well I just want to ask you are your officers making legal determinations in the field that they have have the authority to order people absolutely okay and how are they able to make that legal determination are they using factual evidence years of training no I'm I'm asking you are they your attorney are they using I want to know are these people using answer your you're not going to talk to me I don't have to talk to you I'm talking to you right now and I'm asking you a question well you just had this person assault me so I'm trying to this this is now a part of my investigation so I would like I would like know has nothing to do with an attorney you have yourself a nice I would like to know why man assaulted me you guys can get up a sergeant arrived on the scene and dismissed concerns of assault stating that officers are trained to make legal determinations in the field however under monel venter's Department of Social Services municipalities can be held liable for constitutional violations resulting from inadequate training or supervision the Sergeant's refusal to investigate the assault and his justification of unlawful detention highlighted systemic issues within the department just like this incident here is a terrifying encounter with some crazy cops show me your hands you better not show me your hands you better not okay don't be reaching the encounter began with an officer approaching an individual for standing near a public area demanding identification and acting aggressively under hiel 6th Judicial District Court of Nevada law enforcement can only require identification if there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity despite this the officer failed to articulate any crime the individual was suspected of committing and continued to demand identification when the individual cited Terry V Ohio regarding the need for reasonable suspicion the officer dismissed the explanation and escalated the situation tell me what's going on you keep your hands out your pockets keep your hands out your pockets keep your hands out of your pockets what's going on keep your hands on your pockets keep your hands on your pockets stop get away what's going [Music] on keep your [Applause] hands you want to talk to me tell you what's going on can you keep your hands on your pockets for me [Music] going on [Music] Parker what's going on what's Happening you have any ID on you hey don't be reaching like that I'm telling you don't he acting really strange you sir show me your hands you better not show me your hands you better not okay don't be reaching move don't you don't be stepping up on me get away from me sir don't touch me don't touch me sir what are you doing move what are you doing don't touch me don't be pulling your stuff on me well I don't know what you got behind you you keep reaching behind you what are we doing here [Music] what are we doing what's your name you just talk to us tell us what's going on what's your name and bass number sir pardon me what is your name and bass number Zigman 42 yo what's your name what's your name don't come up on me like that I don't come up on me what's your what's your name I gave you my name what's your name okay Dexter v64 don't reach don't be reach like that what's your name you wanted my name I gave you mine what's [Music] yours the officer surrounded the individual accusing them of acting suspiciously and making vague claims about safety concerns when the individual refused to provide ID one officer repeatedly reached towards their firearm threatening Force Under Tennessee V Garner the use of deadly force is only permissible when there is a clear and immediate threat the individual who was unarmed and not aggressive posed no such threat the officer's actions violated constitutional protections and demonstrated a gross misuse of authority intended to intimidate you going to show me your Ida or what do you got behind none of your business what I can't hear you none of your business sir don't don't pull that gun sir it's not worth it show me your hand keep your hands away don't do it what you got behind your bucket it's not worth it yeah you think you slick I'm not worried about your gun dude I'm worried about your hand all right well you know what go mind your business what's that mind your business sir okay go back in the car now who is since since you came out yourself first police department what's your name I you want my name I I gave it to you now what's your name what's your name what's your name sir what's your name I'm going to cross the street what's that I don't feel safe with you right here okay but what's your name I gave you mine all right well we're going to cross the street what's your name sir [Music] let me see so you're failing to identify yourself to me I'm asking what your name is yeah just small down now sir by law I'm legally here I'm asking you to identify yourself what is your name don't step up on them don't don't step back step back step back step back step back oh [ __ ] call my phone your hand out your phone hey supervisor keep your distance from me because it's co thing what's your name sir do not reach behind your back do not reach behind your back [Music] sir I'm asking you to identify yourself what is your name what is your name sir what is your name four okay cool what is your name don't worry about it well you want to know mine what is your name I'm here legally you're by law you have to identify yourself the officer's incorrectly claimed that refusing to provide identification was a crime despite the individual being under no legal obligation to do so without Reasonable Suspicion of a specific offense as clarified in Brown versus Texas requiring ID without cause violates the Fourth Amendment the individual emphasized this by requesting a supervisor only for the officers to refuse and justify their unlawful demands with fabricated legal interpretations further undermining their credibility I'm here legally you're by law you have to identify yourself fa you failure to do so is a misdemeanor charge secondary yes secondary what secondary offense no it I know what the laws is Sir okay not worried about what your crimes or what you think it is I know what the law actually is okay so so you failing the IDE ify yourself is breaking the law no it's not unless I'm suspected of a crime ter Ohio says You must have reasonable AR ticketable suspicion of a crime through ID I've done nothing illegal that's it you need to suspend me of a crime first that's why it's called a secondary charge no it's like resisting the you know what you need to do get to supervisor out here now no you're not so if I request supervisor you're not going to give it I don't have a supervisor available well you better give one no I need to see your commander who's above you who's above you then the sheriff well get the get he not available well I don't know what to tell you then am I be detain am I free to go I'd like to know who you are you know who I am you don't I'm going to ask one more time am I being detained or am I free to go I'm asking you for your name you didn't say I detained byebye have a good day you're free to go go ahead what was that guy I don't see might be on the cover sir you can go I can also stay you to leave I can also stay sir okay then identify yourself I don't have to do that I need to go back go to the next call manil [Music] now next time I ask for your ID you give it that's understand you understand what I'm saying do you understand me sir I already gave you my information that's right I I should only have to ask once okay sure well have a long about your day and have a good one all right have a good day guys you to stay safe look at this dude the encounter ended with officers threatening the individual stating next time I ask for your ID you give it this attempt to enforce compliance through intimidation violated United States veren Hall which prohibits coercion during interactions with law enforcement the officers then dispersed without providing a valid legal reason for the stop the incident highlighted the failure of multiple officers to adhere to basic legal standards as their unlawful demand and intimidation tactics reflected systemic issues of accountability and training within the department like And subscribe for more police camp stories watch the next recommended video click to watch now