Serious. This is not a traffic stop. Step out of the I have not broken a law. Get out of the car. We're going to drag you out. We're going to break your window. Drag you out. Don't do this. What? What conduct did I do? Disorderly conduct. It's a criminal charge. It's orderly conduct. Attempted to diffuse the situation by releasing the agent under Florida statutes section 7. Just like this incident, here's a moment when corrupt cops are out of control. Dude, what is your problem, bro? Are you looking to do you see this? Is your Are you Are you recording? Yes, sir. Okay, good. I'm going to get that body cam, bro. I'm going to file a complaint on you. Get out of the car. We're going to drag you out. We're going to break your window. Drag you out. Don't do this. What? What conduct did I do? Just orderly conduct. It's a criminal charge. The driver was traveling within the speed limit when a police cruiser suddenly signaled for them to pull over. Expecting a routine stop, the driver complied. The officer approached with unnecessary aggression, making demands beyond what the law required. Under Texas Transportation Code Section 52 21.025, a driver is only required to exhibit their license, not physically hand it over. Understanding this, the driver held up their license through the window, refusing to engage beyond what was legally necessary. Frustration grew on the officer's face as he it attempted to push his authority further. When he reached for the door handle, he found it locked. The driver, fully aware of their rights, remained calm while the officer's power trip started to unravel. I open a law. Have I broken a law? No, but this for officer safety. We don't know what's in the vehicle. We like to step out. Well, this isn't a traffic stop. You're giving your law to order. This is not a traffic stop. I have not broken a law. Well, I'll tell you what. You're under arrest. So, get out of the car. Get out of the car. What am I under? Disorderly conduct. Get out of the car. Yeah, let go. Get out of the car. We'll talk about it, but right now you're resisting arrest. Get out of the car. We're going to drag you out. We're going to break your window. Drag you out. Don't do this. What? What conduct did I do? Disorderly conduct. It's a criminal charge. Disorderly conduct. Arrest 13-20904. Anything that disrupts a piece of another. Get out of the car. You're under arrest. Wait. You witness disorderly conduct to arrest. Get out of the car. Are is there a charge here? My lieutenant's right here. It's disorderly conduct to arrest these people. We'll talk to you. Well, he's saying I'm under arrest. So, once we're on the window, we'll talk to each other. Well, am I under arrest or not? We're doing not under arrest and you're saying what you say. Okay. I'll agree with you there. Want to act like a normal person? I'm under arrest like What did I just tell you? You said I'm not. What did I tell you? You're being detained, right? Sir, please step out of the vehicle. No. Okay. So, I cannot talk to you. Okay. You have any weapons in the car? I'm not going to answer anybody. Okay. Because this is a big difference between us taking you out or not. You can run down the window the whole way and let us see your hands or we're going to break out of the car. Roll down the window. This isn't even at the point where this isn't a negotiation. I I understand my right offic said I'm under arrest and you said maybe. Now I'm not I'm not stopped for a traffic stop. You're being legally det investigate something. Yes. Okay. What are you investigating? It's a little conduct. Okay. When Well, I didn't want to do this early. So, what do you want to know? What happened? What I have on film talking, you know, he was not together. So, I tried to arrange a meeting with this guy. We had an incident. He got in one of my security guys face last night. So, I tried to arrange a meeting with a guy. Then he got all cuz he was on a text with security even though I'd sent him an email to meet with me about his actions. So then he came up and just stormed the office. Very combative. We have a history of one of the other parts of being combative. He recorded me the whole time. I just wanted to have a professional conversation. Describe combative. What does that mean? raising his voice extremely high. Okay. So, yelling. Um not listening to my side. He's recording me. Was he um he tried um I have a kind of a line cross and he tried to well he got in my security guy's face last night. Okay. Um so I just wanted to have a conversation with him this morning about our rules and policies. He he escuated this morning. I I tried to do it in a professional way and he said I we've aggravated his PTSD and all I tried to do was talking about the rules and policies and got to this. Okay. So, how close was he when he was yelling at you? Oh, within pretty deep. But he he he was yelling and using it as what the conversation was last night. So, it wasn't like it was he's very intimidating. I mean that's that's all I can say. Was he cussing? No cussing. Okay. Did he threaten you? Just said he was going to uh take it to legal and corporate and Okay. What So what are the text messages? So this is what concerned us. Um security officer basically said that we were going to meet with him at 8:42 at 10:30. So you refusing and he says why are you being evasive? Please give me the manager email. I sent him the email with all my contact information. Then he says, "Act like no one is safe here and you're rude, immature, and evasive. Now you made me unsafe, aggravate my I will only do not approach me or else things may escalate." So we thought, well, this is going to get out of hand. And then we just called when we need to see back, which was obviously going to get a regular conversation. Mhm. Okay. So, what do you guys want him done? Well, he can't really stay here. Do you want him trespassing the property? Yeah, he can't. Okay. And he he I said, "I need you to leave the property and we'll deal with this outside, you know, or we'll deal with this after the fact, but he can't be here acting like this." And he's already intimidated one of my staff last night. He's intimidating to us, so he can't really be here. Okay. All right. Um, do you feel you you keep saying he's intimidating and combative, so combative? Very argumentative. Just argumentative. Okay. Was he squaring up with you, bowing up? No, just Okay. I don't think he's threatening my safety, but he's not listening to Congress. And you you guys don't want him here anymore because of him violating whatever policies, rules you have. Well, at this point, since it's got combative like this, okay, and that it's going to escalate and even though he didn't respond to my email about meeting with Okay. and then he just came to the office. You want him trespassed now and you want him off property now? Okay. I have I paid $5,500. I have no statistics. All right. So, here's the deal. Basically, do we have disorderly conduct? sometimes um with him. It doesn't sound like it was necessarily a disorder. He was argumentative. Went into the the the store or whatever last night had gotten into an argument and gotten into a security guard's face. That was last night. Um today he was just he went in there basically doing this argumentative, yelling, screaming. He wasn't crazy. No profanities, no threats. Um he was about 3 ft away from the guy the whole time. Um he said uh he felt intimidated but he didn't feel like he like in yeah like wasn't trying to start a fight with like if you look at thisly conduct statute I mean is this guy fit the statute disturb a piece of another I mean I see what you're saying yes these guys are h you know so I don't know if you could disturb a peace if somebody's peace isn't who isn't at peace at the time you're saying it's like if I'm starting an argument with you and you're arguing back with me. It's mutual. I got you. So basically I I think and then if we're going to I don't think they could trespass this guy because like it's private property. You buy into this. I mean they might he's a member. They might be violating their own policies or their own whatever the heck. And they might have a lawsuit on the sound of a civil side. It's still private property. They can kick him out if he wants. Yeah. But he's part of an owner though. Okay. So he's not just camping here. So he's he's in an RV spot. He's like, "One of these other RV guys." It's no different than like a hotel, isn't it? I mean, I don't know. Let me let me ask this dude what's uh Well, let me go ask him real quick. Cuz he said he paid $6,000. So, like if he's a member in this and is that any different than like a time share guy that buys into something and staying at a hotel? Like, it's no different. So, as far as a hotel goes, well, okay. So, let me ask you this. Are you guys willing to [ __ ] this guy up? Because that's what's going to happen. No, I I mean we're going to not here. So, we're not here to fight or anything like that. So, that's what I mean. So, we got this murky civil process. So, why are we going to put ourselves in a line? Because it really doesn't change our life if we walk this guy or not. Except for the trespassing part. Well, I'm not sure if he is. And if we don't know for sure that he's trespassing, I mean, like, let's look at the trespassing statute and see. But if he's not absolutely trespassing, if he has some type of property rights to this, I'm gonna go ask them what exactly his role as far as is he does he live here temporarily kind of like does he rent basically? He has 20 here. I got some paperwork in here for sure. And what I'm thinking too is that you know you can't just when you look at some of these some of these are like residential things like that guy and these guys are porches. So, you know, that's what it makes it look to me like more of a landlord tenant thing. Or maybe they might have to their corporate might have to sue this guy to kick him out of the park, you know, because he's he's probably violating the terms of his contract. You know, there's probably some language in there that says, "Hey, I can't be an [ __ ] when I'm staying here, but that's not us to enforce, you know." So, you know, that's what I mean. It's like we could, you know, we could seriously put the hurt into this guy. Yeah. Well, and I want to take No. Anyway, that's where I not that this is anything, but reservation number and they got a 21 night reserve in and out. So, it's not like he's got his member number, though. So, yeah, I don't know. I don't know what this means. D is far right. The officer escalated the situation by issuing commands that had no legal basis. Under Pennsylvania versus Mims, an officer can only order a driver out of the vehicle if there is reasonable suspicion of a crime. Without such justification, the demand was unlawful. The driver remained composed, refusing to be intimidated into compliance. Desperate to assert control, the officer threatened arrest. However, Texas Penal Code Section 38.15 states that obstruction only occurs when someone actively interferes with an officer's duties, not when a person simply refuses to wave their rights. The officer's attempt to create a charge out of thin air backfired, leaving him standing outside the locked vehicle with no legal justification to act further. uh buy a membership and it can ranges from like 6,000 16,000 and then pay month yearly. The reason I'm staying is cuz I have a right to stay and I haven't done anything wrong and we we're going to figure that out. All right. Thank you. I apologize. I made a mistake in saying that you're under arrest for disorderly conduct. Okay. So he says that he has basically like a time share through thousand trails. It's a membership. We control that it's a privilege. It's not a right. Okay. And uh I mean we could basically suspend him or terminate his membership at this juncture for acting like he is. So he has no rights to be here. Okay. Uh so how long does he he doesn't lease a site? There's no tenant landlord agreement or nothing. So, he doesn't fill out any rental agreements or anything like that. No rental agreements at all. It's a right to use contract. I even I even put all of our rules in here related to the issue last night and and all of our membership rules. And one of them is being disruptive. We're not abusive or disruptive behavior. That's one of them. Um, you know, I I know if he has a service animal, we have to be respectful of that, but that the dog wasn't under his control. It wasn't leashed. Um, he had electric vehicle in the lodge, which we don't allow vehicles in the lodge. So, that that's your guys's those are all our rules. Rules as far as So, he hasn't filled out any lease agreements, rental agreements. They're just right to use contracts to to use our facilities. Um, that's all they are. And so, at this juncture, we could submit him up for suspension or termination depending on how he goes with us. Okay. All right. Well, uh, so it could affect the his future usage of our of our membership, but there is no ten just tight for me. Okay. Hey, Ly. I'm terrible with names. Cory, right? Okay. All right. You're free to go. And I'm going to ask you, you don't have to. Yeah. Would you be willing to show me the recording? Yes, I will show you of of in here of of Now that we're done, you release me and we're good to go. I'll shut off I'll shut off my phone. You're 100%. We're going to show you so you can get the tone of what we're going and and let me double check the kind of dog you have Heat. Heat. Backup arrived after the officer called for assistance, hoping to gain support in his failing attempt to control the situation. The second officer, evaluating the circumstances, quickly realized there was no valid charge. Under Terry v. Ohio, a detention must be based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, which was entirely absent. The first officer, unwilling to admit defeat, continued to push for an arrest. His actions crossed into unlawful territory when he attempted to justify a charge of resisting. However, Texas Penal Code section 38.03 defines resisting as using physical force against an officer's efforts, which never occurred. The legal misstep was obvious, and the second officer saw the risk of liability growing. With no justification left, they had no choice but to let the driver go. Okay. So, this is the security office. So, you can just see here. So, here's here's security when he says I was out disorderly at security. So, I'm walking around. I think it stalled for a second cuz he uh you guys just want to watch that. I'm going to go talk to them. Okay. So after talking with with my lieutenant um so we think this is more of a civil dispute [music] between the two. Okay. Between the company and and him. Um so I'd recommend going through court to get him taken Yeah. taken away from the property, evicted [music] never to use the company again. Well, we don't need to go through court. We can we can suspend him today. That that's that's that's how do we get him off the property? Again, we're being told that he has some sort of agreement that he's allowed to Okay. No, but we don't know. Okay. So, we're going to leave it at that. We're going to tell him that he's not to have any contact with you and any of you. Okay. And vice versa. You guys just leave him alone. Now, if something disorderly happens to the point where he's threatening, okay, meaning I'm going to hurt you, I'm going to kill you, I'm going to break whatever, I'm going to burn stuff down, whatever. Or he's trying to fight you guys, okay? Squaring up, bowing up, [music] getting in fighting stances, cussing at you, yelling at you. Call us cuz then we can come back, okay? Cuz that's disconnect. But but by by our rules and and he's subject to our rules if we can ask him to leave at any time. You can you can ask him. Yeah, but he's not going to but we we can't force him right now. And talking with my lieutenant, he's he's agreeing that uh we don't we're not going to force him to to leave. Okay. Because it sounds like a big civil right civil issue between between you guys. Does that make sense? I guess that's I mean in in other incidents we've had before with similar [music] issues, we haven't had that problem with asking someone to leave. I think he's just really pushed the line. Mhm. I mean, I know we're hearing some of his what he's saying. I mean, I know he's putting you guys in a bad light, too. It It's just that we have to we have to listen to both sides. So we have to come up with solution. Okay. And we've determined that there's no crime. No, there is no crime. Okay. So that's where No, just breaking the member rules. And that's but that's not a lawful a law crime. So does that make sense? So yeah, still I I know. So but Okay. Well, just if something else happens, call us. Okay. All right. Okay. Thanks. All right, security. So, I'm walking around. I think it stalls for a second cuz he uh you guys want to watch that. I'm going to go inside. No, this one. I can't see too much. Listen at this point. Oh, that's better. It's the sun when you face it that way. Which way? When you face it that way, it's in the sun and you can't see it as well. Oh man, you guys look like that's that one. So then Why did that stop recording though? Was your interaction done with that? I walked away. I was like just going to get and I just walked away. Give me Convenient. What's convenient? Oh, nothing. You have the other ones on there. What's convenient? The fact that you stopped recording when you wanted to. When I walked away, it was convenient. Yeah. Dude, what is your problem, bro? Are you looking to do you see this? Is your Are you Are you recording? I'm recording. I'm recording. Okay, good. I'm going to get that body cam, bro. I'm going to file a complaint on you. That's out of line. Convenient. You know exactly what you meant by that. You're choosing to record what you want. How? I'm recording the whole interaction. I turned and walked away and you're telling me that's convenient. Were you there? Do you know what happened? I'm trying to give you evidence right now and you're starting [ __ ] You I'll leave you. I'm sorry. That was my mistake. I apologize, sir. I'm leaving. Clearly, I'm all things. All right, man. Yeah. You shouldn't have said that. Yeah. No, I [ __ ] up. I'm sorry. Cuz I was going to try to talk to him afterwards and ask him not to put this [ __ ] on YouTube. Well, that was going to happen anyways. The driver did not let the abuse of power go unanswered. A formal complaint was filed detailing every unlawful action taken during the stop. Under 42 US Code section 1,983, individuals have the right to sue for civil rights violations committed under the color of law. The officer's actions captured on video provided undeniable evidence of misconduct. Faced with [music] legal pressure, the department was forced to address the incident. Internal affairs launched an investigation, and the officer's history of similar behavior came to light. The attempted power play resulted in consequences, not for the driver, but for the one who thought the badge gave him unchecked authority. Like and subscribe for more police cam story. Watch the next recommended video. Click to watch now.