MediaMatrix
Home
Channels
Videos
YouTube
Import New Channel
Update Existing Channel
Update All Channel Videos
Import Missing Videos
YouTube API Settings
API Docs
Quick Actions
Add Channel
Add Video
YouTube
Import New Channel
Update Channel Videos
Update All Channel Videos
Home
Edit Transcript - Legal Expert/Cop Breaks Down Recent Police Cases Across the Country
Home
Videos
Legal Expert/Cop Breaks Down Recent Police Cases Across the Country
Edit Transcript
Edit Transcript
Language
Format
Source
Auto-generated
Yes
Confidence
Content
good afternoon this is Daniel here with Copwatch TV and I am the host of the live show and what we're going to do today is we're going to go over and break down some of the most interesting and important cases that happened in policing over the last couple weeks so just a little bit of a road map of where we're going today the first couple cases that we're going to cover involve chief of police so typically when we talk about you know controversial officer involved shooting or you know something interesting that happens in the world of policing usually it doesn't include a chief of police because typically a chief of police isn't going to be out there on the street taking calls for service but there's been a couple different incidents around the country that involve a chief of police that we're going to talk about first and you know also we're going to talk about this we're also going to see you know what what kind of a role does the chief of police play you know incidents like this do they hurt morale in a department or even more importantly to ask is there something good that can come out of this uh again if you haven't already please go ahead and subscribe to the channel over here at cop watch TV and make sure you go ahead and share it with friends and family just so we can get as many people as possible into these live shows know we typically do this on Friday around lunchtime usually just after noon Mountain Time really curious to see where everybody is watching from today we got Gary from Indiana how's it going autistic shill hey how's it going we have Jason from Georgia and uh we have Vicky from Massachusetts uh uh Mr shill is from Winnipeg and uh let's see bears and cigars uh looks like bears and cigars has an emblem of the Chicago Bears so um you know I'm going to be I'm be real honest I'm pretty biased towards that because I'm from the south side of Chicago I'm a huge bear fan my dad had season tickets to the Bears um my entire time growing up so um pretty excited about that bears and cigars we got Bas from Oregon sheep dog from Pennsylvania it's good to see everybody and we got James is from San Jose California it's good to see everybody in just like we do every week while I'm going through some of these cas if you have any interesting comments or context or even if you disagree with me on some of these cases go ahead and put it in the chat one of my favorite things to do while I'm doing this show is to kind of go back and forth and you know answer questions or you know maybe your opinion is is you know more educated than mine on something so I definitely like to hear it um besides talking about the besides talking about the uh besides talking about the two cases that involve police Chiefs we're going to talk about two controversial officer involve shootings one them is a little funny and and I because no one was injured I I do I I want to say that it's funny and the last one is going to be a controversial officer involved shooting where the police officers might get charged it's that kind of a case um Ben Crump is involved so we'll be interested to to kind of see um what happens in that case and also again like my name is Daniel you can go ahead and follow me everywhere over at police law news over on uh Twitter or X Instagram everywhere um I do content pretty much um throughout the day on those other channels all right so the first case that we're going going talk about today this happened in Albuquerque New Mexico and you know like I've said before I recently retired from the Albuquerque Police Department so um you know I I do want to let you know that I know just about everybody involved in this case even though there's only one person who was involved in this case so let me go ahead and explain what happened so the chief of police in Albuquerque New Mexico his name is Harold Medina um he's been our chief in Albuquerque for probably about four or five years or so and um he was going to a press conference last Saturday um in an area in an area of the city now um I I I want to say that this area of the city it's not it's not a it's not a it's not a good area of the city it's a pretty high crime area of the city um when I started it was called the war zone now that wasn't the official title of it but a few years ago well maybe a decade ago or so the politicians who run the city said we're no longer going to call this place the war zone we're going to call it the International District so you know it that makes it seem nicer but here's the problem so so you don't do anything to really you know stop the crime or to stop the crime in the area so it's no longer called The War Zone it's called The International District again changing the name really doesn't change exactly what what happened um what what what happened there but it does seem like you know some scenes that we've seen recently from Palestine and Syria and Iraq because this is one of the highest crime places in the city so the chief of police on a Saturday he was actually heading up there to do a press conference with the mayor and what I can say on behalf of the chief is you know this is a Saturday morning and here he is spending his time um doing a press conference talk about crime in a high crime area this is absolutely the kind of thing that we want to see a chief of police do and that that's what a chief Medina did while he was on his way up there he was headed to the headed to the press conference and um he was with his his wife was in the car and I'll get to that in a second that we do have a policy um that you know police officers can take um uh spouses wives uh spouses wives um children you know in in their police car they they can go ahead and take them with them you know in the car you know if it's for a legitimate reason you know picking up to and from you know there really isn't any any policy against that you know one of the reasons why the Albuquerque Police Department did that is essentially the best way I can describe it is to kind of give it a perk um it's one of the things that Chief Medina has been uh in favor of which I think is a good thing um so as the chief was headed up there with his wife in the car um They Came Upon um on on Central Avenue they came which is a big Street in Albuquerque They Came Upon you know basically a homeless Camp kind of on the side of the road that chief stopped um to kind of see what was going on with this homeless camp that was essentially kind of spilling out o over and into the sidewalk where there are businesses there and what the chief said he was going to do is he was going to go ahead and give a call to the area commander um give them a call and basically have some officers come out there and talk to the individual see if they needed any help or if they were committing any crimes um however while the chief was doing that you know kind of stopped there on scene um two of the individuals two of the bums got into a bum fight like right there um the chief's wife said hey look these two guys are are are are you know I I call it a bum fight I'm guessing that the the the chief's wife um didn't call it a bum fight but you know she let the chief know hey there's two individuals who are fighting right there it was at that point that one of the individuals pulled out a gun and the way that this was was structured is that essentially the gun was fa fa pointed in the direction of the vehicle that the chief and his wife were in um it was at that point that a shot was fired as soon as that happened the chief basically you know the best way that I can describe it and what I see in the video evidence he basically hit the gas he hit the gas he got out of there he he ran a red light and um as he ran a red light there was a classic Mustang vehicle uh the I mean full send it right there was a classic Mustang vehicle um that was essentially going the other way on the street with a green light the chief ended up smashing into that car um total the classic Mustang the driver of that car he did sustain some pretty serious injuries um so so that that's what happened in in Albuquerque New New Mexico um you know it was a a uh the individual was it was a critical transport to the hospital my understanding the individual Wills Will Survive but he does have some pretty serious injuries now as you can imagine when this happened in a he's going to have to have 10 plus surgeries of the victim of this you know you can imagine that when this you can imagine that when this happens in a city like Albuquerque that has you know 600,000 people a thousand person Police Department when the chief of police is involved in a crash like this you know there's going to be a lot of questions that are asked you know one of them is you know because Albuquerque police officers have body cameras you know this the police department was one of the very first large police departments that this Police Department was one of the very first large police departments um in order to um have in order to have um uh body cameras that basically all officers have to wear um there's a body camera policy that basically says that you know anytime you get out of your card for a law enforcement contact that you have to turn on your body camera so one of the first questions is hey do we have any body camera footage of this and the answer is no um the chief did not have his body camera rolling again not in defense of the chief but just to say if the chief did something right here here's what he did right he he he basically said um that uh he basically said that you know admitted in public you know he admitted in public that he did not have his body camera running and he essentially referred himself to Internal Affairs um he turned on the body camera footage about four minutes later after the crash happened um so he did he did refer himself to to Internal Affairs um you know because his wife was in the car now there's been all kinds of different articles in the paper about hey like let's look at this policy about about allowing family members to ride in cars well again it's like just because the the chief of police was involved in an incident doesn't mean that it should be taken so I'm really curious about people who are police officers or retired police officers or former officers on here you know what kind of a policy do you have do you allow family members to ride with you in the car if you're going to and from someplace you know um I'm really curious about that to see what other people have to say I think it's a good policy because you can use the you can use the take-home car to pick up kids to and from school um you know you can drop your you can drop your your your wife off somewhere if you're you're on your way to work um you know I think it's a good policy um so you know that's that's one of the things that I want to talk about this you know I guess my main takeaway from this case because a lot of times we talk about these cases but you know there are some you know pretty important takeaways from a lot of these cases and and please put in the chat if you disagree or if you have something else my biggest Takeaway on this case is basically like a lot of times police officers I know that when I was in the field working you know and I would be frustrated I would go to Internal Affairs or I would have something something happen where a supervisor didn't like what I did or you know I I did something and then you know four months later some supervisor four or five levels up you know you know would would would discipline an officer for that not even me you know was an officer that I was working with I would be frustrated and I would say something something to the effect of you know like you know well like they should be the brass the people who run the police department you know I'd like to see them take a call for service I would like to see them how would they they haven't been in the field for so long I'd be really interested to see how do they handle it in a in a dynamic situation that's dangerous you know how would they act in a situation like this it's real easy to sit back here not just on the show or me now cuz I'm retired me at my house watching body camera footage there's a luxury there's a privilege to being able to sit back and just watch what other people do but when you're in the moment and it's stressful how do you act and you know that's something that a lot of police officers around the country want for their supervisors well now we know now we know now we see this is what happened when the chief of police was put in in and again a situation that he didn't cause he didn't cause the fight he didn't cause the gun but it's a situation that he didn't cause that really through no fault of his own was a an immediate dangerous situation and he was just thrown into it and I think we have to acknowledge and you know the good here's the good the good that I hope comes out of this is that the not just the the the chief of police in Albuquerque but you know essentially the people who run this police department and hopefully other police leaders around the country just to have some acknowledgement just kind of remember hey this is what it's actually like when you're in the field when something happen s again to to the chief's credit on on this one he did say in the media you know this s he said something to the effect of that I I I thought was good he basically said something to the effect of you know now I now it's it's been a while since I've been on patrol now I can remember what it's like to be that first line officer to be right there when something happens um so that's the good that I I hope comes out of this is that you know a lot of times humans no matter what your training is no matter what your experience is when you have a natural human response when you are put in a in a in a stressful situation that you that is dynamic and you didn't expect to happen this is how the chief of police he has over 30 year years of experience this is how he acted this is how he responded and that humans no matter if you're the chief of police or you're one month out of the police academy you may not react perfect and when we discipline officers or we fire officers we should do it all within that context that you know sometimes humans make mistakes it doesn't mean that that they're a bad person it doesn't mean that they were trying to harm anyone obviously the chief of police his intention I always talk about intention on the show and when I write articles on my substack I always talk about how important that you know I admittedly use someone's intent I maybe put too much weight on that what someone was trying to do you know I I almost I almost um I almost put too much emphasis on intent um de Porter just gave us a Super Chat hey there love your channel uh the first video I watched of yours was the one of the New Mexico cop driving drunk and killed two people very sad deported that was aad case um we do try to cover um cases like that all over not just in new new New Mexico but also all across the country um dter really appreciate uh the uh support um thank you so much for that Super Chat really really appreciate it um Steve Ladner says where was the good officer that we always hear about well Stevie you don't really hear about it because it happen so much um but one thing Dorter um so the individual in the case that we're talking about just to give you an update um the in that officer on that case he was actually sentenced to 20 years in prison um for what he did um on that particular crash um and uh uh you know I I I I I should just say that um uh law enforcement um uh was taken and removed from the okay and um okay so so you know I I not everyone is going to act perfect in a situation that is a dynamic and stressful situation so if anything comes out of this like I said I hope that the individual that I'm talking about intent let me let me finish that up real quick so so it's like I always look at intent so what was the intent of the chief the intent of the chief was to attend a press conference at 10:00 in the morning in order to highlight a dangerous area of the city that's a good thing and then on his way there he wasn't just a lazy Chief right he on his way there he saw a problem that he was going to try to address there's no ill intent there anything that goes in the category that goes into the bucket of hey he's actually trying to do something to make the city a little bit better he saw a problem and he was going to contact someone to do it now yes of course driving away kind of in a reckless manner injuring someone that's not good but again the chief in this situation didn't have bad intent and all that we can hope for is that you know if he does go through the internal affairs process that essentially he will get any discipline than any other officer would and then to kind of keep in mind that you know officers aren't perfect and as long as they have good intent and it it's a it's a there's some kind of mistake that happens in the moment just to keep that in mind um when it comes to not just watching body camera videos but for people who are actually leading police departments to kind of keep that in mind that you know this job isn't as easy as it might seem watching body camera video from the safety of your own house okay so that was the first uh the first uh uh that was the first um uh case involving a a chief of police I want to talk about and there was another one it's actually body camera footage um that I found actually found the I saw the footage yesterday I put up a little video of it uh on my Instagram before I got here today it was at to about 200,000 views so it is something that so people do think that this case is pretty interesting and I'm not the only one who's getting a whole bunch of views on on this particular case but but but essentially this happened in Bradley Beach New Jersey now I've never been to New Jersey and doing some research it sounds like this is kind of the area of like the Jersey Shore um so you know basically um there was a a sergeant his name is Sergeant William major and he was on a call for service it was essentially a crash it was a multi-vehicle crash that involved injuries and there was also one of the individuals was a possibly a drunk driver so he was a sergeant on scene basically trying to manage a multi crash and also a drunk driver so you know he had officers doing those things but as the supervisor on scene you know you want to make sure that those things are being done so again yes and his car was actually helping to block um one of the officers who is doing a DWI investigation you know basically so all that stuff could be done safely so while this was happening an individual walks up to him and at first unless you were local there you really wouldn't know who this individual was um he was you know a 50s something year old white guy who was not dressed in any kind of a uniform um he was in street clothes essentially and from the first word out of his mouth you could tell that he was drunk I mean me watching the body camera video it's very obvious that this person is intoxicated and you know pretty quickly into the into the body camera footage you know uh sergeant major refers to this guy's Chief and this ends up being the chief of police so again now I think police Chiefs have it in their contract that essentially they work 247 meaning like if something happens at 2:00 in the morning they may have to go out so I'm going to use the words off the clock not because and and I get the argument on the other side can be well a chief again a chief is Never Off the Clock they're compensated usually pretty well but again they may have to respond all the time but since this guy was you know it appears to be intoxicated I'm going to say that he was off the clock he wasn't doing a police related activity before this right so he basically walks up to the sergeant you know drunk out of his mind and he starts giving the sergeant about what kind of a jacket he's wearing so the sergeant is wearing some kind of a jacket and because this is body camera footage from the sergeant you really can't tell exactly like what's on the back of the jacket but you know the chief basically says that like you know it says police or or something on on the back of his jacket and it's faded so the chief is giving him about you know wearing that jacket and the sergeant goes hey you know Chief we can go ahead and talk about this later like I'm trying to trying to work here and the chief just won't let it go he keeps bugging him he walks up to him multiple times and finally the sergeant just says Like Chief we can I don't have time to talk about the jacket you know I'm dealing with a crash with injuries and a drunk driving investigation like we can talk about this later which you know is a pretty reasonable thing even though there's a chain of command and the chief is in charge you know it's it's a pretty reasonable thing for the sergeant to say and the sergeant you know he's actually at the beginning of the video it seems like he's trying to cover for the chief because the chief is saying things obviously drunk that are obviously idiotic and the sergeant kind of lowers his voice he's kind of like yeah oh oh okay chief oh okay chief we can go ahead and talk about this later so it seemed like he was trying to deescalate the situation and work pretty much at the same time um and uh and what uh and and and what happened is that at some point the chief wouldn't let it go so Not only was he kind of yelling at the sergeant from the sidewalk he walks up to the sergeant and he he walks up to the sergeant and he grabbed him he grabbed him by the arm um and and as soon as he did that the sergeant responded pretty much immediately he pushed the chief back he said don't touch me and he pushed him onto the hood of the car the chief starts yelling so the kind sergeant and the Chief stands up and the sergeant kind of pushes him and you know anyone who's watched this video I mean to me there is no question that the sergeant was in the right on this because right after that the chief tells the other officers on scene he points the sergeant he goes in his drunk voice he goes take him in take him in basically trying to get the officers to arrest the sergeant for what just happened obviously the officers didn't try to arrest the sergeant but it's um uh yeah it's uh it's it's it's pretty it's pretty it's pretty interesting it goes on for a while and then after that the the chief keeps saying the keep Chiefs the keep Chief the chief keeps saying things like I I I I love you and and all that all that kind of stuff like I love you you know you're your sergeant here like you know you could tell that their relationship that maybe there's something there but it's like it's weird for the chief to act like this but then like drunkenly say that he he loves the guy and he keeps trying to pull the sergeant off the scene he's like you have to meet me back at back at my office you are suspended right now you have to meet me back at the office and the sergeant is was like well like if you want me if I'm suspended I'm going to go home I'm not going back to the office right now so I don't think the sergeant did anything wrong I mean in fact I think the sergeant acted you know pretty pretty good here um uh referen the um uh reference the uh uh uh situation um you know that was dealing with I should say that the sergeant was also a k9 Sergeant so you know it's reasonable to ask does the K9 get uh suspended too um but you know what ended up happening so here's was basically the Fallout from that so you know both individuals were put on leave while there was some kind of Investigation the sergeant actually went back to work pretty quickly we which is a good thing um which is a good thing um and Sergeant went back to work the chief who makes I think $175,000 a year he was put on administrative leave you know as far as I know he's still on administrative leave they have an acting Chief in there so it looks like you know when this actually got to investigators or people to actually look at this you know it's pretty it's uh pretty um it's pretty interesting to see that um uh it's pretty interesting to see that you know I think this went the right way that the chief was clearly in the wrong the Sergeant's back at work and looks like the chief is going to lose his job or he should lose his job because this isn't the kind of thing that a chief of police should be doing one he's he's intoxicated he shouldn't be doing anything law enforcement related but even if he was sober can you imagine working for a chief here you are on a crash trying to manage a crash make sure everybody's save and Mak sure officers do a d uh driveing while intoxicated investigation to do all that and you have a chief of police yelling at at you about the wrong jacket obviously if you're wearing the wrong jacket you could have a wardrobe conversation later this isn't the time or place no reasonable supervisor or chief of police would have a conversation about that right then um so uh cjun Randy says once he was told he was suspended he should have went immediately home I agree cjun Randy he should have said um it seemed like the sergeant was like well I still want to at least finish up this call because like my car is literally blocking where there you know where there's a crash car so I'm kind of helping so it seemed like he kind of um uh you know wanted to at least finish that call and do the right thing but kjun and Randy I agree and again it's like also the chief is drunk so you know like what's you know what what happens then and you know because the chief put his hands on him is there going to be some kind of a criminal investigation so again the idea that the sergeant is going to stay on scene like I get it but um so yeah it's a it's a an interesting conversation Steve Ladner says the chief will be rewarded with retirement anyone else would be fired and in jail yeah Steve so looks like he does he's not going to be the chief anymore so he's lost his job but Steve most of the time when you reach the level of chief of police you're already eligible to retire um so you know so I you know the the 20 years I was with uh hey Ethan how's it going the 20 years I was with the the the police department you know I think I had like four or five different Chiefs of police um they were all retired you know had they all had retired and had come back to work so again so say Steve lad say he's rewarded with retirement well again it's likely this Chief was already you know El ible to retire so yes he get he get he gets to retire that's what happens anyone else would be fired and in jail I I don't I don't know about that Steve I mean if you work for Walmart and um if you put your hand on a on a police officer is Walmart going to fire you I'm I'm going to say probably not um and I'm not trying to defend this Chief uh this Chief Steve because I think the chief was in the wrong but again the chief lost his job over this when you know in almost any other industry if you acted like this you wouldn't lose your job I do think the chief should lose his job because I think that police offer officers especially a chief of police should be held to a higher standard but again in most injuries if you worked in the tech sector and this happened um yeah you couldn't um do that um Steve lader can you draw a full retirement if you get fired oh Steve that's such a good question so it's gonna DET it's gonna vary state by state but Steve in general yes yes you can um typically you can so the way that retirement works again in most places someone correct me if I'm wrong is that the way that you get to retirement is you have to work so many years so you have to worked so many years in some places like so like the the place that I worked I had to work 20 years if you work 20 years then you get a pension right so let's say an officer uh in other places like Indiana it's this weird math problem cops are terrible at math so this makes no sense in some places like Indiana it's some kind of a math problem it's like you have to work this many years and you have to be this old this many years old and it has to equal 75 and it's like it's a math problem to determine when you can retire um so so Steve I guess I'm going with this let's say you know it's it's a 20-year retirement let's say you're the chief of police and you've worked 22 years and you mess up like this Chief did um yeah I mean you've already met what's required to um uh to to retire so just because you get fired or you uh resign under bad circumstances you typically don't lose your pension the way that you would lose a pension Steve and again I'm going to say typically in Most states is if you do something Criminal on duty um so uh do you guys remember the case I'm not going to remember his name off top of my head um but uh the guy the police sergeant in Bowling Brook Illinois uh Drew um uh you guys help me out Drew uh I can't remember Sergeant Bowling Brook Illinois um he killed um he was convicted of killing his ex-wife and then uh Peterson Drew Peterson in Illinois retired police sergeant from Bowling there we go retired police sergeant from Bowling Brook Illinois he was convicted of killing his second wife and then his third wife actually went missing and and they never found her um he's in prison for that so while he was while Drew Peterson was in prison they actually because he had earned his time to retire he they actually went back and they were able to um basically um you know through the state of Illinois um they were able to basically pull his pension or get his pension taken away because he committed you know crimes on duty so that's typically the way it goes otherwise um as long as you meet whatever time there um to get a pension you typically get a pension hope I answered your questions Steve um all right let's see if we have any other questions um let's see James eeko won't be the first time a chief got into with one of his officers I agree James it's not we've showed other videos like this before but uh this was interesting mostly because of the intoxication level of the sergeant and um yeah but we have played uh we have played videos like this before JS says the higher they go up the more they cover up does this include stitching people up um uh yeah so I mean this is just one of those things um you know with with body camera you know any of the the corruption stuff like that hopefully the the the the more we have body cameras hopefully the less of that kind of stuff we have and not being able to to cover things up um but uh so now I'm going to talk about a couple officer involved shootings you know they're both they're both I I guess I would say I always use the word controversial but the first one really isn't controversial um it's kind of funny the second one is controversial and I know we're going to have a difference of opinion about whether or not the police officers should be charged with crimes but but this one I'm going to talk about it's basically the acorn case if you haven't seen the memes on the acorn case like I'm kind of glad this happened just for the memes like this this thing is is absolutely ridiculous um there's a couple people that I I I really like um I I I follow them both um uh Drew Breezy um he's over at what say drew over on Instagram he's a retired lieutenant from Florida and he runs the com Center podcast another individual I follow um he's from Columbus Ohio uh thoughts of a police officer with officer Ben and um uh you know they they they've gotten to a pretty heated spat over this um over this case on the last couple days um and I like them both so I'd like to see them reconcile um but you know so I can see even people who are pro police in the police World kind of you know have some disagreement over this or at least how this should be covered you know I'm I'm I'm basically taking it that like you know sometimes funny things happen in policing even if it's over a shooting as long as no one gets injured it's okay to laugh about it it just is you know a lot of this job in being a police officer is having a dark sense of humor and when someone does something something stupid you should be able to say it this guy did something stupid this happened in akaloa akaloa County Florida um and and essentially you know basically what happened is the officer mistook I'll get into the details here in a second but the officer mistook oh hey Britney how's it going um the officer mistook uh the officer mistook an acorn falling on him for gunshots and he ended up firing an entire magazine into his own patrol car I know that sounds crazy I'm going to explain what happened because if you just hear it there it sounds crazy now I'm going to try to I'm going to try to explain it it's still going to sound crazy but maybe it'll make a little bit more sense and again the memes on this um are keeping this thing alive um which it absolutely should because this is this is this is this is absolutely hilarious so basically what happened is um here here in uh so this officer I think he had 13 months on um he had 13 months on um so basically you they usually do a year um he he basically uh you do a year of probation um and then and then you're you're basically off off probation so this guy had this guy had 13 months on um his his history is that um he went to West Point so he was in the military um I think he was deployed to Afghanistan twice but he wasn't in the combat zone um so he wasn't in any kind of a combat zone but he was deployed twice so he does have you know at least some military training and Military experience he had 13 months um on the police department and um uh and he um uh so uh I'm being told that he's what a military guys call a fobit um I don't know what that is but I'm not a military guy but that's what I am being told um uh I'm being told uh uh and James S says yeah apparently he got a squirrel he did uh uh forward operating base person who doesn't go into combat okay uh so so so basically what um what happened was is they arrested an individual for stealing a car so they have this guy in custody for stealing a car um he's in handcuffs he's in the back seat of the police vehicle and while they're doing the investigation somehow they get some information either it's it's someone on scene or it's it's an investigator somehow they find that you know basically right before they arrested this guy that he had posted a picture or shared a picture of him in the car holding a gun basically pointing a gun in the car so now police officer are thinking okay so we have this guy who's under arrest for stealing a car and you know here's a picture of him literally just a few minutes before holding a gun in that car and when they searched him they couldn't find a gun so now police officer thinking okay so so there's probably a gun somewhere and they search the car the gun's done the car so now the officers are kind of thinking okay did he conceal the gun on him now I know this sounds silly I get it but it actually has happened before it absolutely has happened before where someone was able to hide a gun conceal a gun a police officer just didn't do a good enough job searching the individual and that the individual is actually able to shoot the the police officer so again it doesn't happen very often thankfully but it's not impossible it actually does happen before I retired from the Albuquerque Police Department I was teaching a class called AEL active bystanders ship in law enforcement in that class we actually cover one of those cases that actually happened this way that an officer didn't do a search um as good as they should the guy went into another person's car that officer didn't do a search even though they were supposed to and as the officer who was a father of three kids as he was driving he didn't have anything to do didn't have anything to do with with this guy's arrest he was just the transport officer as he was transporting uh the officer transporting the guy to Jail the guy was able to um take out a concealed gun that he had even though he was in handcuffs he actually shot the officer and killed him um very sad so again not doesn't happen often very rare but still possible so so let's go with this in a situation like this like is it reasonable that you would search this guy a second time just to make sure knowing that there's some evidence that he had a gun yes that's not unreasonable and yes of course I'm going to say just like everybody is is probably shouting at that shouting at their screen right now well it's their responsibility to search him really good before you put him inside the car I agree with you 100% so that's kind of the mindset of the police officer is basically he's walking back to his car thinking this guy may have a concealed gun on him that's what he's thinking as he's walking as he's walking back to the car um you spelled Karma wrong there right Camera Action as he's walking back to the car um he basically acorns from a tree above acorns are start coming down from the tree above one of the acorns hits the car one of the acorns hits the officer's leg and for whatever reason he doesn't say hey um uh there's acorns falling on me that's kind of funny for whatever reason he starts to think that that the person in the backseat of the car is shooting at him and he acts in pretty much the most ridiculous way possible he basically he hits the ground he starts rolling around he says shots fired and then he starts yelling I've been hits and you he basically creates distance as he's doing these crazy bar barrel rolls um he has medical blue gloves on for some reason I don't know what kind of a search he was thinking he was going to do on this guy um but you know basically what he does is he starts firing rounds at the back of his patrol car um he empties an entire magazine he reloads and he starts firing more there's a sergeant who's you know basically on the other side of the car his grouping was all over the place a terrible shot placement which is probably a good thing for the guy in the back of the car right um so the the there there was a a female sergeant on scene who sees this and you know as he's yelling shots fired she starts shooting into the car too you know I'm going to be honest I actually have more of a problem with with her actions than I do with his actions um because in order for police officers to legally lawfully within policy fire their weapons they can't just shoot their guns and fire their weapons uh because that guy is doing it or because that officer is doing it no you have to have you have to be able to articulate an independent threat so here's my question to that female sergeant what was the independent threat that you saw what was the independent threat that you saw that you end up firing your weapon none basically she was shooting because he was shooting um the good news is that somehow um the guy in the back seat was not hit he was not injured that that is a good thing that is 100% good thing um so the he was he was not injured um obviously dur during the there's going to be an internal investigation on this for a situation like this I would expect I was expect a uh police officer to I was I would expect a police officer to you know for sure be um I would expect a police officer uh to sure for sure be terminated you know fired um and maybe even charged with a crime um yeah I I would I would you know maybe even be charged with a crime I would I would think that um but however that's uh that's not what that's not that's not what happened um the officer um uh the officer basically um during the internal investigation um he the officer resigned um during the internal investigation so he resigned um obviously he's not going to be picked up as a police officer anymore but he's also not going to be criminally charged um you know I could I could see a situation where the officer would be criminally charged and you know essentially what we what what we would have to do in a situation like that is you know the officer would basically have to say you know why he reason reasonably thought it was a threat and I don't see how you get there because again it was an acorn so I'm not saying this officer was a bad guy but he made a mistake and it's an it's absolutely ridiculous so the memes of you know cop shooting at acorns is a is a hilarious Meme and um uh yeah so and it's because no one was injured that we can go ahead and laugh about it Steve lader says fast food workers are held to higher standards I don't know Steve I mean this guy uh so Steve I would I obviously what you said is silly um but you know I would you know if this guy kept his job I'd be like ah yeah you got me St but no I mean he resigned and uh and uh again um if uh uh he he resigned and um you know uh if if if that wouldn't have been the case um I would I would see it um uh yeah I mean there's always an argument that people who do hair have more um professional hours than Police Academy I've debunked that multiple times that isn't true um and uh so yeah that's that's that case it's absolutely it's absolutely a a ridiculous thing and uh uh you know the the the dispute between um you know thoughts of a police officer and then then my friend Drew Breezy um over at what say drew their dispute was basically about you know thoughts of a police officer officer Ben you know he was basically joking about it sharing the memes and the other side Drew Breezy was saying that you know we should we should take this a little more seriously um I love them both but no when cops do ridiculous I think it's impossible I think it's important to talk about how ridiculous it is um uh yeah and again to me the most concerning thing is that the unene also began to fire her weapon um because that was absolutely insane doesn't doesn't doesn't make any sense um all right so this last officer uh involved shooting that we're we're going to go ahead and talk about this is a controversial officer involved shooting Ben Crump is actually involved representing of the woman who was shot by police officers um so this isn't a funny case this is this is a Ser this is a serious case um so you know we're going to go ahead and talk about it and I'm really curious to see um what anybody else uh what anybody else thinks about it um one more comment from Steve cupman San Antonio beat up a handcuff pregnant woman and was rehired and rewarded with back pay fast food workers are held to higher standards uh yeah I don't know Steve U you put the name of the person in there um uh so just really quick on Steve's comment so Steve basically says that a th Antonio cop did something wrong uh he was rehired and rewarded with backpay let me just break that down a little bit so when he said rewarded um or when he says rehired to me that seems like the police department fired the indivi individual so it seems like you know whatever the officer did in that situ Steve C if I'm wrong whatever the officer did he was fired by the city which again if a cop messes up I think we all agree they should be fired right or does something you know criminal or something egregious they should be fired so we have um uh so we have the individual who was uh so we have the individual the officer was fired and then you know when it says rehired to me that seems like that was per the order of a court so my guess is he was fired then he challenged the termination basically a court told um told told the police department that they had to rehire him with with with with back pay so again if we're going to put you know we're going to so who would be to blame on that would it be to blame the police department who fired the guy and was forced to rehire him no I guess we have to blame the the the court system which again you know there's not a lot we can do about the court system so um the fact that the court system you know made the police department hire and back to me makes it seem like it's not as simple as you put in there that that's just my opinion uh rights Camera Action good to see you LPD shot a man holding a plastic fork yes rights Camera Action that was absolutely a legal lawful reasonable officer involved shooting I covered it um over on my channel um police law news um over on Twitter and Instagram I do think that was a legal and reasonable officer involved shooting and um uh I can cover that case next week um I can cover that case next week wres camera action and explain why and we can go back and forth and have a good time with it um so this case basically happened on February 3rd in Harris County Texas um you know basically police officers fired at a woman who was was walking towards the door with a gun um so you know a lot of these a lot of these different cases have questions so the question that I'm going to ask which is I think is the important question to ask is that here's whether or not this shooting was within policy or within the law you know objectively reasonable we have to ask was it reasonable for the officers to believe that the woman approaching the door with a gun was an armed burglar so did cops have a reason to think that this woman was was a burglar um and you know how long should cops wait to fire their guns let me tell you what happen so police officers or deputies I guess in Harris County Texas were dispatched to a call at an apartment complex um yes Steve Ben crumps on this case um so uh police officers were dispatched to a call in an apartment complex I think the call was for residential burglary so police officers go to the call and they talked to the person and it turns out whatever they were there for didn't really happen so there wasn't a burglary or wasn't a Tres but whatever it was it ended up being nothing but cops are talking to you know one of the witnesses and they said hey you know what happened uh up above me I think there was actually another burglary that happened and cops are kind of like well hang on what and they're like yeah we heard like um like like a glass break and crash and we heard someone walking around up there and yeah there's a lady who lives up there but like we think her house is like being burglarized you know a couple minutes ago and the cops are like all right okay let's let's deal with it right so so the police do basically what they're supposed to do they go ahead and investigate it and when it comes to tactics I'm going to disagree on what they did and I'll tell you about that at the end let me tell you what they did do so basically it was two female police officers and they walk up the stairs to the apartment and you know so when you're on a call for service a lot of times what people tell you isn't exactly what's correct you know because again people aren't trained Witnesses and you know a lot of times they only have hear something so a lot of times when Witnesses tell a police officer something it's not always accurate it's not correct or there's some context that's missing so a lot of times when a police officer hears something like that the first thing they do is they kind of go and check it out and they go well does the evidence match what I'm being told and if so okay then maybe we have something here I that's a reasonable thing for a police officer to do so the officers walk up the stairs and they see a couple things they see that there's a screen that had been basically moved away from the M the window was um resting on the other side of the wall and they see Glass Broken they see a broken window with glass broken okay so they have a witness who again is you independent witness and shouldn't have any skin in the game to try to get anybody in trouble you have a witness again who lives underneath who lives you know right below they should have an idea of what's happening in their building so you have a witness who says hey there was a burglary then the cops go upstairs and they see evidence of a burglary right so now they're both the cops are both thinking okay we probably have a residential burglary now it's at this point I would have done something a little bit different than the police officers did I'll tell you that in a second but here's what they did do they basically walked up and um you know one of the officers um was pretty much holding on the window CU they they could look through the window and see what was going on inside and another officer basically walked up right to the front door knocked rang the doorbell knocked and yelled Sheriff's Department Sheriff's Department um so you know basically to let them know what was what was going on and um basically what happened is there was a woman Inside and um the woman uh Miss pouncy ebony pouncy is her name and Miss pouncy was inside the residence um she grabs a firearm and she starts approaching the front door with a a firearm in her hand okay and it's as she's approaching the front door it's at that point that both police officers basically unload on her um they go through a couple different magazines and they shoot her a bunch of times I believe she shot five different times somehow and thankfully Miss pouncy survives now let's break this down a little bit so so who is Miss pouncy so let's talk about it from her perspective so miss pouncy is a friend of the woman who owns the apartment well miss pouncy essentially got permission to go over to the friend's apartment but the friend didn't have a key so the friend told Miss pouncy hey you can go ahead and break the window to get in so from her perspective from her point of view she's not doing anything wrong she's not doing anything illegal she had permission to be there and the friend who owned the apartment or you know was the was the tenant of the apartment gave her permission to break the window in order to get in so miss pouncy from her perspective she didn't do anything wrong she's a normal person living her day and she had total permission to do what she did now look let's look at it from the point of police officers police officers weren't just you know run around harassing people or saying hey let's let's ring doorbells and and screw with people no police officers were specifically told hey I think there was a residential burglary up there and then they walk up and they see evidence that anybody would think is evidence of a residential burglary so as Miss and again they didn't just weren't just like creeping around the apartment or the house like a Steven Perkins case right what they did is they knocked on the door and they said Sheriff's Department we know this because it's on body camera video I love body camera video because otherwise the Ben Crump would would lie and say the police officers never identified themselves like they lied about that in the bana Taylor case right but we know that the police officers knocked and said sh yelled Sheriff's Department okay so it's now police officers at this point they think that they have a residential burglary they've announce themselves loudly as police right there there's no question this is the the reality the objective reality of what happened now you have someone inside the residence is it re now here's my question is it reasonable for the police officers to believe that Miss pouncy is a residential burglary which which is a felon that she had just committed the felony of residential burglary like is it reasonable for the police officers to think that well yeah it is it doesn't mean that miss pouncy is guilty Beyond A Reasonable Doubt but in the moment when you only have like one or two seconds to say hey this person in there like what do I think they are anybody would think that yeah that's a it's a reasonable thing so now you have someone who you reasonably believe just committed a felony you've already announced police now they're walking to the door with a gun what are you thinking as a police officer you're thinking this person just committed a felony they know that I'm a police officer cuz I yelled sheriff's department and they're approaching the door with a gun so that's what the police officers were thinking in the moment and I'm telling you yes they weren't right but I'm telling you that is not an unreasonable thing for those officers to think so as Miss poun is about to open the door the police officer shoot her again it ends up being that you know that she was the friend and obviously it's a tragedy because we didn't want this to happen so earlier I said I would have done something different what would I have done different not just what I have done different let's talk about best practices what should police departments what should training acmy what should instructors what should police leaders what should we tell police officers to do in a situation like this and I said this a lot of times police officers are really good at following instructions what I mean is you write a policy and then you train them how to do something most of the time they're going to do that not all the time but most of the time they're going to do that so what so let's talk about this and please put in the comments if you disagree with me or if you have any any idea um or if you have any idea what police officer should do so here's my opinion here here's my opinion of uh you know what the officer should have done so I think that they they they took the report or they had the information that there was a burglary and they went up and they looked around and they checked I think that was the right thing to do right now once they checked and they saw the evidence of the burglary they saw the screen move they saw the broken glass to me at that point that's pretty good evidence that they have a residential burglary now there could be someone inside my guess is that the SOP the training I don't know any police training that would say hey if you think you have a felon inside of a place like a residential Burgery you just knock on the door and ring the doorbell and yell police that's probably not the right thing to do what I would do is I would have and I think what what you know basically policy and tactic should be is the officer should have got in the radio and say hey hey you know what we're actually we think we have a residential burglary here's what the apartment number is going to be can we get two officers on the south side of the house one officer on the north side of the house can we get a sergeant and a CIT if that stuff is available you set up a perimeter around the house you go back from a place of cover right so either either downstairs or behind and you try to go to a place of cover and that's how you try to make contact and you give very clear instructions this is the Harris County Sheriff's Department apartment 2B can we please have all occupants exit with your hands up and empty you know and you try to go about that while you're trying to give commands you also have dispatch try to reach the owner of the house house right because police officers have unbelievable databases right or you try to get a hold of the apartment manager police officers basically police officers basically yeah rights Camera Action yes surround the place police officers basically have access to managers of Apartments like their personal cell phone numbers a lot of the times or they could go ahead and give a call you know maybe take it would take five or so you have the place surrounded and you have one officer doing some research right so you have one officer do doing some research that says hey now we're going to contact the apartment manager then you go ahead and you get the and again no cops are cops aren't paid like by they're paid by the hour but it's like there's no hurry there's no hurry there's no reason to rush this right um there's no reason to rush any of this take your time especially if it's a possible felony so you contact the apartment manager then you contact the owner of the house hey I'm officer I'm officer Daniel with the Harris County Sheriff's department and Hey listen looks like someone knocked out the window of your house just making sure is anybody supposed to be there was it like that when you left then you would have had the woman say oh yeah you know actually my friend Ebony she's in the house I told her to do that there's no there is no burglary right so it's like these are the kinds of things that police officers can do on the front and and here's what I'm going to say is that really the fix to this if we want police officers to be better because as I've said before the goal of this the goal of this show the goal of my contact the goal of the goal of the articles I write the goal is basically to make it so there's less so there's less so there's less violence between citizens and police and a lot of times we have to really examine policies and training and practice of police and then on the other side we also have to you know a lot of times if you know people just didn't resist arrest and fight with cops that this would all be avoided but this is a situation where I honestly think that a different policy a different training different tactics could have avoided this um so so you know in a situation like this once here's what I'm going to say is like you know once all of the the way to fix this it's all in the front end it's all in how police respond to an incident like this on the front end the steps that I said about making sure the place is surrounded doing a little bit of research and using a real-time crime Center or or the police databases to try to get some more information before you just go knock on the door that's where the fix to this is because here's the thing once you're in a situation where you honestly believe that there's a felon inside the building and that felon is walking towards the door with the gun expecting police officers to be perfect in that moment that is not the fix to this you know we're always going to have trouble if that's where we get to um that you know because then you have to ask yourself okay you're police officer who honestly believes that someone who committed a felony is approaching the door with a gun the question is how long do you wait do you wait until the person has the door open do you wait until the person till the gun is pointed at you do you wait until your partner is dead like that that's a that's a tough that's a tough question to ask and it's for that reason I do think that this shooting was you know objectively reasonable it was within the law um I I I do think that the shooting was within the law because again if if the police officers had a reasonable belief that she was a residential burglary burglar which they do um and she's walking towards the door with a gun um so now they have someone who they honestly believe and reasonably like like an independent reasonable person in that situation would say yeah that's uh okay someone who committed a felony is now approaching the door with a gun you know that's the question how long do you wait if there is training or policy or law that tells a police officer exactly when they could fire please put it in the chat I'm real curious because I'm telling you there isn't it the standard is what is objectively reasonable Can the police officers articulate an imminent threat and in this case they did and the reason why I'm saying that and harping on this because I want situations like this to happen less that's the goal but the fix again is not when the police officer is they already at the door and Miss pouncy is coming to the door with a gun and police officers have 34s of a second to make a decision if you think that situations like this like are going to be fixed if you wait until then it's not anything the officers can do it's all on the front end to slow down to involve a sergeant to use your resources and it's all of this deescalation and resources on the front and that's how we fix this rights camera action it's called backing up I agree 100% um so yeah let me see the some of the comments uh here uh let's see um Steve says using your logic if a nosy neighbor is sitting in one of his homes cleaning his guns you can call police to take him out um uh yeah I don't know Steve I mean again like the the police officers in a situation like this had evidence of a residential burglary um again I think that that's objective you know that's not that's not me being biased anyone in that situation would think it's a residential burglary my issue with what the officers did is that once they had very good evidence of a residential burglary is that they didn't do anything else they didn't back up they didn't set a perimeter they didn't try to get a hold of the owner they didn't they didn't contact a sergeant they didn't do all of these other things on the front end and here's the thing what if this and I don't know anything about Harris County Texas I know Harris County I think is near in the Houston area so my guess is a pretty big sheriff's department but I don't know how big it is you know what if those deputies the thing I'm very simple things I'm saying now what if they never had that training what if they never had that education what if you know this wasn't the the standard operating procedure what if the way they did it is exactly what they've been told to do well then it's really difficult to blame the police officers and we have to blame the politicians who run the police department and you are both supposed to be the ones who are in charge of putting training like this together um it's one of my problems with the defund the the police movement is that when you defund police you do things where you take away resources you take away not having a real-time crime Center not having enough officers to where hey maybe those two officers were the only probably not in Harris County but what if it's a it's it's more of a rural place and you have a situation like this what if these are the only two deputies that are working that night and there is no backup it's only them again like these things that we want police offic to do to avoid situations like this it might not be possible so you know when you when you do things like defund police you take away the the different resources and you know the different trainers to come in to talk about this kind of stuff and um again I want less officer involved shootings um and I'm telling you in this case um what I think the police officers could have done differently to avoid it um again that being said I I do think it was a legal reasonable officer involved shooting I don't think that the I don't think that uh I don't think the police officers should be criminally charged and um uh yeah I don't think that they should be fired I think what they did in the moment was objectively reasonable um pulling the trigger in the moment they did like I I get why they did it um unless they violated some policy before they got there was their policy in place that they were supposed to notify sergeant that they were supposed to set a perimeter is there some training or policy that they violated I think that's where the that's where the the fix is um also you know when you defund the the police we got to talk about mental health um as well um you're going to have more mental health crisises um you know if if police departments and cities don't put um some emphasis on that as well uh JS says police are framing people for making charges for some people ah I don't know Jay um so Jay so um the kind of the way that I run this show and um you know really all the content I do is I like to I like specific things I think it's very easy to say that oh the the police frame people the police are racist the police are this and just H like BJ that just isn't very interesting so if you have a specific case like hey here's one one case here's two cases where the police did this hey Dan can you go ahead and talk about this yeah let's talk about it and if the cops messed up I'll tell you they messed up if the cops committed a crime I'll say yeah they should probably be be prosecuted for that um and Jay one of the things on the show is that um even after the show ends if you put a case in the chat I pretty much check it throughout the week and you know I probably will go ahead and cover it next week if you have any ideas for us um so um so all right so that's going to be the end of the show that was the last case that we were going to cover today um again I want to thank everybody for being a part of it we got some really good really good questions um um in here and I really like the I really like and enjoy the back and forth um so I think that the the next one of the next cases that uh I'm going to go ahead and uh uh one of the next cases uh Miguel I did I talked about the acorn case um go ahead and uh uh rewatch The Show Miguel the acorn case was the first officer involved shooting case that I uh covered it was about 20 minutes into the show Miguel so go ahead go ahead and watch it put your comments in the chat Jay thank you so much um again um definitely go ahead and uh subscribe to the channel and um uh uh sub subscribe to the channel if you haven't already make sure that that you that you share it and um you know we like to affect change on this channel so um definitely go ahead and call your lawmaker to make sure that Acorn laws uh Acorn laws are in place and that acorns are are are regulated they aren't for for everybody's use some we see what could happen when there are rogue acorns all right again my name is uh Daniel uh go ahead and follow me over at police law news everywhere um hope everyone has a great and safe weekend and we will see you next week thanks
Cancel
Save Changes