Husband's Mental Breakdown After Wife's Affair | Fresno Police Shooting Analysis | Legal Analysis CONTENT WARNING: This video contains analysis of an officer-involved shooting resulting in death. Graphic content has been blurred but the incident involves use of deadly force. Viewer discretion is strongly advised. This content is intended for educational purposes regarding law enforcement procedures and legal standards. On November 7, 2023, officers from the Fresno Police Department responded to a mental health crisis call in Northwest Fresno, California. What began as a welfare check on a suicidal individual escalated into a confrontation involving assault with a deadly weapon, extended crisis intervention attempts, and ultimately the use of deadly force. This video provides comprehensive legal analysis of the incident, examining: - Fourth Amendment use of force standards (Graham v. Connor) - California's AB 392 deadly force law (stricter "necessary" standard) - Crisis intervention and de-escalation obligations - The "suicide by cop" phenomenon - Mental health crisis response protocols - Officer safety considerations with edged weapons - The limits of de-escalation when subjects force deadly confrontations We analyze the officers' extended de-escalation attempts over 12+ minutes, the tactical challenges of armed subjects in mental health crisis, and the legal standards governing use of deadly force. The subject was pronounced deceased at the hospital following the incident. Grades: Officers: B- Department: C+ Subject: Not graded (mental health crisis) This incident highlights the critical need for enhanced mental health crisis response resources including co-responder programs, specialized crisis negotiators, and accessible mental health services to prevent such tragic outcomes. SOURCES: - Fresno Police Department Body Camera Footage (Public Record) - Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) - Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) - California Penal Code Section 835a (AB 392) - California Welfare & Institutions Code Section 5150 - Deorle v. Rutherford, 272 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir. 2001) - Hayes v. County of San Diego, 736 F.3d 1223 (9th Cir. 2013) DISCLAIMER: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal standards vary by jurisdiction and case-specific facts. Views expressed are analytical opinions based on available footage and public information. If you or someone you know is experiencing a mental health crisis: - National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: 988 - Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741 - NAMI Helpline: 1-800-950-NAMI (6264) #UseOfForce #PoliceAccountability #MentalHealthCrisis #LegalAnalysis #GrahamVConnor #BodyCam #CrisisIntervention #FresnoPD #OfficerInvolvedShooting #AB392

police bodycam officer involved shooting use of force mental health crisis suicide by cop Fresno Police Department legal analysis Graham v Connor California AB 392 crisis intervention de-escalation deadly force police accountability law enforcement Fourth Amendment CIT training mental health response police shooting analysis bodycam footage tactical analysis officer safety edged weapon police procedures suicide prevention mental health awareness