Orig vid (set to private): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSBkv1ytaEE Jeff's upload: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMRHJ2bY0bg 18 USC 245: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/245 Poly Audis channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8WMJsIjGGdBbaA1Jep0qCQ In my opinion, what this boils down to is a DEMAND, under color of "law" (namely 18 USC 245, as cited by Poly Audis) to be served and a THREAT that, if they don't have their demands met, they will call for the violence of the state to force the cookie shop owner into compliance. Further, in my estimation, Poly Audis violated the shop owners right to be secure in her business. This seems like a clear interference with someone's life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. If we aren't free to deny business to WHOMEVER we choose and for WHATEVER reason, then we aren't free. Yes, discrimination is ugly and senseless. Support the work: 🔴 http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlix-Merch 📬 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 1454 Tahlequah, Ok 74465 📬 ✅ Patreon: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlix-Patreon ☑️ SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/highimpactflix 🔵 Private Email List: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial (don't forget to CONFIRM) 🔵 Email: contact@HighImpactFlix.com This video is intended for educational and entertainment purposes ONLY and is in no way meant to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. Nothing in this video should be considered a "call to action." It was created to educate individuals on constitutionally protected activities, case law and individual rights and emphasize the important roll legal action plays in constitutional activism as well as the importance of constitutional awareness. With this in mind, the facts presented in my videos are not necessarily indicative of my personal opinion in all cases, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. None of my videos be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them. FAIR USE This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Educational 1st Amendment 1st amendment Audit Auditors Freedom james Freeman Amagansett transparency Jake Paul San Joaquin Valley Transparency Bay Area Transparency Audit the Audit Oklahoma news now News now journalist independent media first amendment audit Police activity police accountability film in public audit police film police lack luster lack luster audit audit