Use code civil at https://incogni.com/civil to get an exclusive 60% off an Incogni plan. DONATE to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/ In 2017, Trina Martin and her son Gabe were living at the home of her then-boyfriend Toi Cliatt. Early in the morning, an FBI SWAT team battered down their door, detonated a flash-bang grenade, and swept through the home with assault rifles. Toi rushed Trina to a closet while Gabe was alone in his bedroom. When agents discovered Toi and Trina, they handcuffed Toi and started to interrogate him. It was only when Toi stated his address that the agents realized they were in the wrong place. The SWAT team left the home and went to the address of the house they had a warrant for. The lead agent later returned and left a card for Toi to reach out to about compensation. But the federal government refused to compensate them for anything, even though the raid led to lost wages and therapy bills. The three sued the FBI but their case was dismissed first by a federal district court and then the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. More about Martin v. United States: https://ij.org/case/martin-v-united-states/listeners-guide-to-martin-v-us/ Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967 MERCH: https://tcrl.creator-spring.com For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer #lawenforcement #bodycam #lawyer #police #law #legaleducation FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. NOTE: We don't condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system. NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.