A Newport, Florida police officer observes a vehicle repeatedly drifting across lane markers at well below the speed limit late at night. What follows is one of the most comprehensive DUI field sobriety testing sequences captured on bodycam — including all three NHTSA-validated tests, a controversial non-standardized exercise, and breath test results that came back at 0.185 and 0.179 — more than twice Florida's legal limit of 0.08. In this video, we break down: - The legal standard for DUI traffic stops under Terry v. Ohio - How Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus, Walk and Turn, and One Leg Stand tests work — and their NHTSA-validated accuracy rates - Why the non-standardized third test creates legal risk for prosecutors - Florida's Implied Consent Law (§ 316.1932) and what happens when you refuse - The resisting without violence charge (§ 843.02) and whether it will survive - Full grades for both officers and the driver Charges: DUI (Fla. Stat. § 316.193) + Resisting Officer Without Violence (§ 843.02). Case status: Open at time of analysis. All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This video is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. All information is based on publicly available bodycam footage and applicable law as of the date of analysis. #DUIBodycam #BodycamFootage #DUIArrest #FloridaDUI #FieldSobrietyTest #SFSTAnalysis #HGNTest #WalkAndTurn #OneLegStand #DUILaw

DUI bodycam Florida DUI arrest field sobriety test NHTSA SFST horizontal gaze nystagmus walk and turn test one leg stand test DUI bodycam footage implied consent Florida resisting officer without violence Florida statute 316.193 DUI legal analysis police bodycam 2026 legal breakdown bodycam analysis DUI traffic stop breath test BAC 0.185 BAC police procedure Fourth Amendment Terry v Ohio Graham v Connor audit the audit style DUI arrest Florida 2026