On September 7, 2023, a traffic stop in Roland Park, Baltimore escalated into a DUI arrest after a driver failed the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test with a perfect score of six out of six clues — the maximum indicator of impairment. This video breaks down every legal decision made by both the officers and the driver. This video provides legal and tactical analysis of body camera footage from September 7, 2023 in Roland Park, Baltimore, Maryland. ⚖️ Legal Analysis Includes: - Fourth Amendment traffic stop standards (Terry v. Ohio, 1968) - Pennsylvania v. Mimms — authority to order driver from vehicle - NHTSA Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test — scoring and admissibility - Schmerber v. California (1966) — physiological evidence and probable cause - Illinois v. Gates (1983) — totality of circumstances - Maryland open container and DUI statutes - Fifth Amendment — what drivers are and are not required to say 📋 Case Outcome: Unknown at time of analysis. 🎓 Educational Purpose: This content is presented under Fair Use (17 U.S.C. § 107) for commentary, criticism, and education. 📺 Subscribe for more legal analysis of police interactions. --- Fair Use Notice: This video contains body camera footage used under Fair Use for purposes of commentary, criticism, education, and news reporting. The footage is transformative, containing substantial original analysis. No copyright infringement intended. #Bodycam #Police #LegalAnalysis #DUI #FourthAmendment #FifthAmendment #Maryland #Baltimore #FieldSobriety #HGN #Educational #Documentary #TerryVOhio #ProbableCause #TrafficStop

bodycam body camera police DUI DWI field sobriety test HGN horizontal gaze nystagmus legal analysis law constitutional law fourth amendment fifth amendment probable cause Terry v Ohio Illinois v Gates Schmerber v California Pennsylvania v Mimms NHTSA open container Maryland Baltimore Roland Park traffic stop DUI arrest documentary educational audit the audit police accountability driver rights