Edit Watch on YouTube
Freedom is Scary No. 5 - Update on the AR-15 Open Carry Battle
Freedom is Scary No. 5 - Update on the AR-15 Open Carry Battle

The Civil Rights Lawyer  |  2020-08-14

1,278
70
38
1:03:03
ID: ccadCr5zi0I
Definition: hd
Dimension: 2d
Language: en
Description

In episode 5 of Freedom is Scary, an impromptu update on the late-night progress of our legal battle against Putnam County, West Virginia, in their attempts at overturning the Fourth Circuit decision in U.S. v. Black from 2013 protecting open carry rights in open carry legal states, such as West Vir...

In episode 5 of Freedom is Scary, an impromptu update on the late-night progress of our legal battle against Putnam County, West Virginia, in their attempts at overturning the Fourth Circuit decision in U.S. v. Black from 2013 protecting open carry rights in open carry legal states, such as West Virginia. Read more about the Walker v. Putnam County case here: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2020/03/02/federal-court-rules-against-us-in-the-walker-case-let-the-appeal-begin/ Watch the original famous Youtube video of the encounter, here: https://youtu.be/FidBe0w0dCU https://thecivilrightslawyer.com ETA: I discussed the Robinson case. This is it: U.S. v. Robinson (2017): a Fourth Circuit case holding that being an occupant in a car, with a gun, makes you “armed and dangerous” as a matter of law We can really skip ahead a few decades in the endless litigation of reasonable suspicion and Terry v. Ohio and arrive at the current predicament upon which we’ve arrived. In 2017, the Fourth Circuit took a giant chunk out of gun rights, by issuing the “en banc” opinion (which means the entire court of appellate judges on the Fourth Circuit, rather than the usual random three judge panel) of U.S. v. Robinson, 846 F.3d 694 (4th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The majority opinion concluded categorically that the presence of a firearm on a subject, or within reach of the subject, makes that person dangerous, by virtue of being armed with a dangerous weapon. This applies objectively, and does not require any articulable facts by the police officer of some other reason why the person was dangerous. Robinson, 846 F.3d at 699. This is also one of those cases where the separate opinions are perhaps just as important as the majority opinion. For West Virginians specifically, and probably those in North Carolina, Judge Black specifically discusses in his dissent, the potential danger of the majority’s reasoning for Fourth Amendment violations in open carry states. https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/what-are-your-second-amendment-rights-updated-feb-2020/ The other case I confused it with, was another equally bad 4th Circuit gun case: the Kolbe case: https://reason.com/2017/02/22/4th-circuit-upholds-marylands-assault-we/

Transcripts
Add
No transcripts available
Resources
Add
No resources available
Characters
Add
No characters available
Notes
Add
No notes available
Event Details
Edit
No event details available
Stats History
Date Views Likes
2026-10-17 1,278 70
Danger Zone

These actions cannot be undone.