On August 25, 2022, a sheriff's deputy stopped a 20-year-old driver at about 1:00 a.m. on suspicion of driving under the influence. Over about twenty minutes, the deputy refused every alternative to driving home, ran four roadside exercises, and made an arrest. One of those exercises was called "standardized." Was it? This video provides legal analysis of the body camera footage: whether the stop and exit order were lawful, whether the roadside exercises were voluntary, whether the tests were administered correctly, and how the arrest and the handcuffing hold up under Graham v. Connor. Legal Analysis Includes: - Terry v. Ohio, Pennsylvania v. Mimms, Rodriguez v. United States, Berkemer v. McCarty - The three NHTSA standardized field sobriety tests, and why finger-to-nose is not one of them - Graham v. Connor and the force used during handcuffing Fair Use Notice: This video contains body camera footage used under Fair Use for commentary, criticism, education and news reporting. The footage is transformative and contains substantial original analysis. Content Advisory: This video contains profanity and a physical arrest. Viewer discretion is advised. Subscribe for more legal analysis of police interactions. #Bodycam #PoliceBodycam #DUI #FieldSobrietyTest #LegalAnalysis #FourthAmendment #TrafficStop

bodycam police bodycam body camera DUI stop field sobriety test legal analysis traffic stop Fourth Amendment drunk driving arrest bodycam legal analysis body cam