Hoosier HyperWatch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYl36iTVDPA Watkins v. Miller: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/92/824/2529668/ Submit your video for me to review: Lack@LackLusterVideo.com Or through Facebook Messenger: https://www.facebook.com/LackLusterVideos OR at https://lacklustervideo.com/videos ---Gear Recommendations--- Body Cam: https://amzn.to/2W5cEBh Gimbal: https://amzn.to/2KkCmiM GoPro: https://amzn.to/2W7UC1b Radar/Laser Detector $$$: https://amzn.to/37LtQC2 Radar/Laser Detector $$: https://amzn.to/3bGyZfQ Radar/Laser Detector $: https://amzn.to/3qVIiPz DashCam $$$: https://amzn.to/3aHL5pO DashCam $$: https://amzn.to/3mueNBv DashCam $: https://amzn.to/37uQkaW ---Social Media--- https://wlo.link/@LackLuster Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LackLusterVideos/ BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/lackluster/ DISCORD: https://discord.gg/DCzTq4x Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaleHillerYT Instagram: lackluster_media 2nd Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w Live Streams: https://www.twitch.tv/lacklusterlive IOS MEMBERSHIPS: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbEPXqDvej-3mciZxwYmdew/join ---Channel Members--- Tony Routledge Dennis Anderson Shane Bushta david cat & bus JILL REITER Bill B. James B. R and R Dwaine Miller Witch Hunt Charles Clarke Ken Hogg Keiran Tibbits Bob Lau laura miller Candie Anderson Bob Balue Annie V Lynne Huffman Ron Maguire Wally Lumpkin Justin Stringfield Christa C Martin Whalley madcat61207 Bowen Deming Karl P Lori Miller H HAMMOUD Tiffany LaBeauv FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. Disclaimer: NONE of my videos should be considered a "call to action." The content is created to be educational or is newsworthy and of interest to the public. I am not an attorney. My videos should not be construed as legal advice. You should seek legal counsel if you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct. The facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos shown are designed to be educational, and informative. They should never serve as legal advice under any circumstances. The content provided is in no way intended to provoke, incite or shock the viewer. My content was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, and civilian rights, and to emphasize the importance of constitutional awareness. All claims made are alleged. Initially, the incident seems to be going well, with a pleasant wave from the officer. It seems as though the officer has entered the establishment to solicit a trespass. If you were to ask whether they are allowed to do that, the short answer would be no, however some properties have a No Trespassing Letter on file with the local sheriff's office which would allow Law enforcement to act as an authorized representative for the property and to trespass whomever they wish. On July 19, 2019, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided Watkins v. Miller, in which the court examined whether, in response to an anonymous 911 call regarding a man in a parking lot, an officer violated the Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment when he stopped Watkins, issued him a trespass warning, and threatened to arrest him if he did not leave the private parking lot. Watkins argued the officer’s authority and told the officers to check if there was a No trespass letter filed with the sheriff’s office. There wasn’t, nor were there any no trespassing signs. Eventually Watkins left the property to avoid arrest. Regarding the claims the court stated: That a Fourth Amendment seizure occurs when an officer, through physical force or show of authority, terminates or restrains a person’s freedom of movement. However, given that Watkins left of his own free will, he would have believed that he was free to leave, and there was no seizure under the Fourth Amendment. They also stated that His 14th amendment rights were not violated because Watkins did not allege any specific inadequate process that occurred. There is a good argument for deprivation of rights under the color of law, but that would have to be argued to the courts. To date, there is no law, and doubtful are there any department policies that make soliciting a trespass illegal, and we can only argue the ethics. #1stAmendment #Audit #CopsOwned

lackluster lacklusterlive 1st amendment audit first amendment audit 1st amendment audit fail first amendment audit fail 1st amendment audit 2020 1st amendment audit arrest first amendment first amendment audit arrest first amendment audit tyrant 1st amendment activist first amendment audit assault tyrant alert CSPD audit 1a audit 2a audit police fails tyrant bodycam body cam id refusal bad cops owned settlement lawsuit cops owned cop fails police owned