No alleged victim's name appears in this video. The provided video features courtroom testimony regarding the investigation of a case involving an alleged victim and the defendant, Parker. The testimony covers the following key stages of the investigation: Preliminary Investigation and Interviews The detective initiated the investigation after a non-emergency call was received on May 21st. The detective was officially assigned to the case on May 27th and scheduled a forensic interview for June 3rd, 2025, conducted by a forensic interviewer named Cassidy Rally. During this interview, the alleged victim’s roommate and best friend was present. The detective performed a short, roughly two-minute interview with this friend. Later in the case, after charges were filed and the defendant was arrested, the detective re-interviewed the roommate. During this second interview, it was learned that the alleged victim had gone into the roommate's bedroom on the night of the event, but the roommate indicated the alleged victim did not disclose any information about the event at that time. Evidence Gathering and Search Warrants The detective confirmed they never visited the scene of the alleged incident, meaning no photos, measurements, or layout records were collected. The investigation experienced a pause while waiting for DNA results. The detective eventually obtained a search warrant for the defendant's cell phone on November 19th. The detective explained the delay was due to a personal process of wanting DNA results before taking further steps, noting this was not discussed with prosecutors. The detective never examined the alleged victim's phone, explaining they believed communication occurred exclusively via Snapchat and that the search warrant for the defendant's phone was intended to find messages from other applications. Interactions with the Alleged Victim and Defendant The detective testified that the alleged victim expressed concerns about media involvement during her interview, mentioning a teammate of the defendant. The detective stated they were initially unaware of the defendant's identity as a BYU football player, which influenced their early reassurances to the alleged victim that the case would not attract media attention. The detective conducted a lengthy, 47-minute interview with the defendant at his attorney's office, during which the defendant maintained that the sexual activity was consensual and answered questions regarding his upcoming engagement. The detective received results from the sexual assault nurse exam from the crime lab on November 13th. FILENAME: 1E0A9141 Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOdH5V1hktXOmjh3q-pK3vQ/join