If you support what I'm doing here & wanna help me produce more content: ✅ https://cash.app/$HighImpactDonate ☕️ Buy me a coffee or two: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/HighImpactFlix ⭐ SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/highimpactflix 🔴 Grab a Hard-Hitting Original Design: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlix-Merch 📬 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 1454 Tahlequah, Ok 74465 📬 ⭐ SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/highimpactflix 🔵 Private Email List: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial (don't forget to CONFIRM) 🔵 Email: contact@HighImpactFlix.com **Paul's channel: https://www.youtube.com/@PaulUnslaved Paul actually gets the cops to admit that they don't give a damn about the Constitution and that they have MORE RIGHTS than the rest of us!! It's very rare to get a cop to admit that. ***IMPORTANT*** Thanks to Sean Keenan for dropping this info: In case anyone is curious as to the statutory laws the auditor was referring to, here is one…. "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment... In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed... Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it... A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution JTM) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." "Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void." Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60, - "The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution." Reid v Covert 354 US l, 1957. - "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice."- Davis v. Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22, 24. Another consideration from Randy WIlliams: All police in our country are trained to hate the people and to think of us as nothing but animals. The following is how they're trained and I call it = Our Police State and Police Brutality How about a dose of truth about US Law Enforcement: 1) The Supreme Court has said that the police have NO DUTY to protect the public. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html https://mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-you-federal-court-affirms-yet-again#.XFYYw3iiU6Q.facebook 2) The Supreme Court has said that the police do not have to understand the laws they are sworn to protect; https://www.mintpressnews.com/court-rules-police-dont-need-know-laws-enforce/217236/ https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/heien-v-north-carolina/ 3) The Supreme Court has said that the police are allowed to make "reasonable mistakes" even to the point of killing someone; Shoot first, think later= https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-467_bqm1.pdf 4) The Supreme Court has said that police are allowed to lie and be deceptive; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazier_v._Cupp https://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/05/jn This video is intended for educational and entertainment purposes ONLY and is in no way meant to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. Nothing in this video should be considered a "call to action." It was created to educate individuals on constitutionally protected activities, case law and individual rights and emphasize the important roll legal action plays in constitutional activism as well as the importance of constitutional awareness. With this in mind, the facts presented in my videos are not necessarily indicative of my personal opinion in all cases, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. None of my videos be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them. FAIR USE This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Educational 1st Amendment 1st amendment Audit Auditors Freedom james Freeman Amagansett transparency Jake Paul San Joaquin Valley Transparency Bay Area Transparency Audit the Audit Oklahoma news now News now journalist independent media first amendment audit Police activity police accountability film in public audit police film police lack luster lack luster audit audit Constitution Bill of Rights 2nd amendment second amendment