DONATE to the Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/ In the blink of an eye, a peaceful day of yardwork for Penny McCarthy turned into a nightmare. She was on her driveway in Phoenix, Arizona, in a sleeveless shirt, shorts, and slippers, when a team of United States Marshals pulled up in unmarked vehicles and aimed firearms at her. Penny—who is a 67-year-old grandmother—was clearly at their mercy. And yet, the officers threatened to “hit” her, frisked her, placed her in handcuffs and ankle shackles, and drove her away from home. The officers did not so much as check Penny’s driver’s license or run any other basic checks on her identity before violently arresting her. The whole time, Penny calmly but persistently insisted that there must be a mistake. The officers claimed that she was Carole Rozak, for whom they had an arrest warrant. But Penny was not Rozak, and Penny had no connection to Rozak. The officers had made a huge, inexcusable error. Details/ Full Lawsuit: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/2025/06/24/grandmother-arrested-on-25-year-old-warrant-for-someone-else-lawsuit-filed/ Details from the IJ: https://ij.org/case/arizona-mistaken-identity-arrest/ Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967 MERCH: https://tcrl.creator-spring.com For business inquiries: civilrightslawyer@ellify.com Blog: https://thecivilrightslawyer.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/johnbryanesq Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JohnBryanLaw Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/johnbryanesq/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer #lawenforcement #bodycam #lawyer #police #law #legaleducation FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. NOTE: We don't condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system. NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.