Edit Watch on YouTube
(In)accuracy Visualized: The Hollywood Sharpshooter Myth
(In)accuracy Visualized: The Hollywood Sharpshooter Myth

Real World Police  |  2019-10-12

300,707
5,520
1,025
11:10
ID: u6pUpSSqOsA
Definition: hd
Dimension: 2d
Language: en
Description

An unfortunate reality is that police officer shooting accuracy is nothing like what Hollywood depicts. According to a 2008 RAND Corporation study evaluating the New York Police Department’s firearm training and performance, between 1998 and 2006, the department's average hit rate during gunfights*...

An unfortunate reality is that police officer shooting accuracy is nothing like what Hollywood depicts. According to a 2008 RAND Corporation study evaluating the New York Police Department’s firearm training and performance, between 1998 and 2006, the department's average hit rate during gunfights* was 18 percent. When suspects did not return fire, officer accuracy increased dramatically... to 30%. What makes that particularly unfortunate is the reality that all fired bullets have to go somewhere. Inaccurate shooting has innocent victims. Statistics from the Metro-Dade Police Department from 1988-1994 published in a Police Policy Studies Council report indicate that officers had fired approximately 1,300 rounds at suspects during that period, missing more than 1,100 times. Their hit rate was a hair over 15%, most of those shots from very close distance. For the Los Angeles Police Department, in 2016 the total number of rounds fired compared to total number of rounds which struck their intended targets resulted in a hit ratio of 48%. This was a 10 percentage point increase compared to 38% in 2015. Context, however, is important: the LAPD's 2012 through 2015 aggregate hit ratio was just 28%. The devil is in the details whenever you are examining data. Here are two examples relating to officer accuracy figures: Example #1: The statistics above don't account for lighting conditions. Indeed, there are some indications that officer accuracy is significantly higher in adequate lighting. Example #2: The number of officers present has an enormous correlation with shooting accuracy. Data from Los Angeles County (sourced between 1998 - 2002) indicate that officer accuracy drops from ~50% when one officer is present to an astonishing low of 9% when more than two officers are involved. Meanwhile, the average number of shots fired per officer was 3.59 when a single officer was involved, and increased to 6.48 when more than two officers were involved! Michael D. White of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice examined what he called "the well-documented inaccuracy of police officers who use deadly force" in a 2006 paper titled "Hitting the Target (Or Not): Comparing Characteristics of Fatal, Injurious, and Noninjurious Police Shootings." His conclusion: "A number of factors emerge as predictors of shooting accuracy including distance, suspect actions, and officer approach and preparedness. Alternatively, a number of seemingly important factors appear unrelated to shooting accuracy including lighting conditions, use of cover, and gun type." So... it's complicated. Another surprising non-correlation? A 1988 -1994 dataset from Metro-Dade Police showed no significant correlation between officer range scores and officer accuracy in the field. More recent data indicate no significant change. A 2018 study of the Dallas Police Department published by the Force Science Institute found that the department's overall hit rate was in line with all of the other research. Researchers analyzed 149 real-life OIS incidents over a 15-year period. In nearly half of these encounters, officers firing at a single suspect missed the target entirely. In the 134 cases where researchers could establish the number of shots fired, they calculated the hit rate at 35 percent. The authors of that research caution their reader that the “generalizability of findings” from a single department “may be limited" and urge that future research “investigate shooting accuracy in a more comprehensive model” to confirm that their findings are representative of law enforcement beyond Dallas Police Department. Unfortunately, it appears to be. This video provides a rare direct view of the (in)accuracy described above. SOURCES Rostker, Bernard D., Lawrence M. Hanser, William M. Hix, Carl Jensen, Andrew R. Morral, Greg Ridgeway, and Terry L. Schell, Evaluation of the New York City Police Department Firearm Training and Firearm-Discharge Review Process. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG717.html. Los Angeles Police Department, "Use of Force: 2016" White, M. D. (2006). Hitting the Target (or Not): Comparing Characteristics of Fatal, Injurious, and Noninjurious Police Shootings. Police Quarterly, 9(3), 303–330. Aveni, T.J. (2003). Officer-Involved Shootings: What We Didn’t Know Has Hurt Us. The Police Policy Studies Council https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/may/25/shannon-watts/do-more-7-10-police-bullets-miss-their-mark-gun-co/ *A gunfight was defined as a confrontation where the bad guy has a gun.

Tags
real world police rwp protect and serve body cam police footage +2 more
real world police rwp protect and serve body cam police footage dash cam bwc
skip_transcript skips transcripts. Blank clears.
Transcripts
Add
en Auto
2026-10-22
Resources
Add
No resources available
Characters
Add
No characters available
Notes
Add
No notes available
Quick Actions
Update Video Data
Generate Transcript Not implemented
Website transcript generation is not implemented yet. TODO: connect this action to a transcript workflow. Fetch transcripts through the existing Colab workflow, or add a transcript manually.
View Analytics Not implemented
Video analytics is not implemented yet. TODO: add video trends and charts. You can view saved statistics history on this page.
Event Details
Edit
No event details available
Stats History
Display time zone: America/New_York Whole website Change in Settings

Latest 30 snapshots in save order, oldest saved to newest saved.

Older entries with no recorded time zone are shown as recorded and marked unknown.

Date & time Views Likes Comments
2026-10-17 03:40:19 (zone unknown) 300,706 5,522 1,025
2026-10-22 14:06:11 EDT 300,707 5,520 1,025
Danger Zone

These actions cannot be undone.