Channel operation
- Elapsed time
- 0s
- Estimated remaining
- Estimating…
No changes saved yet.
Keep this page open while work is running. Estimates change with channel size; leaving may interrupt unsaved work.
View results
Tulsa Oklahoma Officer's Power Move Backfires Instantly
Crimes to Courts | 2026-06-14
Description
first amendment audit, police accountability, know your rights, bodycam, cops, police encounter, cop watch, audit the police, law enforcement, police overreach, tyrant cop, public filming, civil rights, obstruction, code enforcement, Tulsa Oklahoma USA, Oklahoma news, crime and court, constitutional...
first amendment audit, police accountability, know your rights, bodycam, cops, police encounter, cop watch, audit the police, law enforcement, police overreach, tyrant cop, public filming, civil rights, obstruction, code enforcement, Tulsa Oklahoma USA, Oklahoma news, crime and court, constitutional rights, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, qualified immunity, lawsuit update This police encounter happened in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, during a City of Tulsa neighborhood code enforcement visit at a residential property in Northeast Tulsa. The situation started over a camper or RV, city zoning rules, utilities, property maintenance, and a complaint based inspection. City officials discussed Tulsa Title 42 zoning and whether the camper could remain on the property, whether it could be connected to utilities, and whether it had to be moved to the backyard on an approved parking surface. The citizen recording the encounter identifies himself in the footage as William Kendrick. He questions the city workers about the ordinance, public access to private property, public servant accountability, and whether government employees can avoid being recorded while working in public. The interaction grows more tense when the citizen checks the tires on a city vehicle and city workers request police assistance. Tulsa Police then arrive at the scene. Officer Bigelow identifies himself in the video with badge number 2185. During the police encounter, the officer tells the citizen to go away and stop talking while city workers continue their enforcement discussion. The citizen argues that filming, speaking, and standing in public are protected by the First Amendment, while officers mention interference and obstruction. The moment that made this video spread across the cop audit and police accountability community is when Officer Bigelow pulls his Taser during the confrontation, then puts it away after the citizen challenges the escalation. This video raises major questions about public recording, First Amendment rights, obstruction claims, code enforcement authority, police response, law enforcement training, and how government employees should deal with citizens who know their rights. It also connects to broader USA audit topics seen in police bodycam, cop watch, 1st Amendment audit, sheriff deputy encounters, traffic stop videos, city hall audits, courthouse audits, and public servant accountability videos from places like Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Denver, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Miami, and Las Vegas. As of 2026, there is no verified public record found showing a confirmed lawsuit settlement, cash payout, civil judgment, or court award connected specifically to this Tulsa Oklahoma encounter involving Officer Bigelow and the citizen seen in this footage. No confirmed public update shows that the citizen received lawsuit money from this incident. Based on the publicly available video history, the main aftermath appears to be public attention, online discussion, criticism, commentary, and continued debate about police overreach, First Amendment auditing, citizen recording, and government accountability in Tulsa, Oklahoma. This upload is presented by Crimes to Courts for commentary, criticism, education, public interest review, and news reporting. The purpose is to examine the actions shown on video, discuss constitutional rights, and encourage peaceful awareness of how citizens and public officials should handle police encounters. If you follow first amendment audit videos, bodycam footage, police misconduct reviews, cop watch channels, crime and court updates, know your rights content, law enforcement accountability, qualified immunity debates, civil rights cases, and public official transparency, this Tulsa Oklahoma case is one to watch closely. Disclaimer: This video is for educational, documentary, commentary, criticism, review, and news reporting purposes only. Crimes to Courts does not encourage harassment, threats, violence, doxxing, or unwanted contact toward any person, officer, agency, city employee, or private individual shown or discussed. All people shown are presumed innocent unless proven otherwise in a court of law. The opinions expressed are based on the publicly available footage and are intended for lawful public discussion. Notice: This video uses material under fair use for criticism, comment, review, and news reporting as per Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. #firstamendmentaudit #policeaccountability #knowyourrights #auditthepolice #tyrantcop #policemisconduct #bodycam #copaudit #policeoverreach #copwatch #firstamendment #1stamendment
Tags
Transcripts
AddResources
AddCharacters
AddNotes
AddQuick Actions
Generate Transcript Not implemented
View Analytics Not implemented
Event Details
EditStats History
Latest 30 snapshots in save order, oldest saved to newest saved.
Older entries with no recorded time zone are shown as recorded and marked unknown.
| Date & time | Views | Likes | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-17 04:23:04 (zone unknown) | 54,150 | 1,752 | 42 |
| 2026-10-22 14:09:19 EDT | 54,152 | 1,752 | 42 |
Danger Zone
These actions cannot be undone.