Edit Watch on YouTube
'That's My Car Actually'   Ownership Claim During Drug Trafficking Investigation
'That's My Car Actually' Ownership Claim During Drug Trafficking Investigation

Eye on Patrol  |  2025-05-15

766
21
1
2:50
ID: vFtZcGuT-sE
Definition: hd
Dimension: 2d
Language: en-US
Description

REAL POLICE BODYCAM footage captures a dramatic daytime encounter when officers question a woman who claims ownership of a vehicle abandoned during a drug trafficking pursuit in La Crosse. This bodycam video documents her contradictory statements as she attempts to explain her presence at the scene ...

REAL POLICE BODYCAM footage captures a dramatic daytime encounter when officers question a woman who claims ownership of a vehicle abandoned during a drug trafficking pursuit in La Crosse. This bodycam video documents her contradictory statements as she attempts to explain her presence at the scene while denying knowledge of the fleeing suspect. In this police bodycam footage, officers report the initial contact over radio: "144, I got her out of the car." The questioning begins directly: "You, you don't know who this was?" When she responds "No," the officer asks about her suspicious behavior: "Okay. Why, why would you go and move the car?" This opening exchange, captured on the bodycam, immediately highlights the improbable nature of her actions. The woman makes a significant claim: "Well though that's my car actually." The officer seeks clarification: "It's your car? But yeah." After requesting identification, the investigation takes a curious turn when the officer asks about the suspect: "first is Daeshawn." The woman responds with extreme denial: "Copy first of Daeshawn. I have no fucking clue." This emphatic statement, recorded on police bodycam, directly contradicts both her claim of ownership and her later admissions. The officer confirms her ownership claim: "This is your car?" She responds affirmatively: "Yes," then adds: "Okay. Well it's gonna be uh—" Before she can complete her thought, the officer radios: "144 out of 27." She continues explaining her partial registration: "I have the title to register it. I obviously haven't registered it as you see I don't have plates on it." When questioned about her relationship with the suspect, she denies being in the vehicle: "How did... Were you in the car with him? No." She then provides an alternative explanation: "I was um over on the north side his sister's house. She lives over here um that way." The officer seeks clarification: "Okay. And he was over here?" Her story expands: "Well he had called me and told me that something was going on and so I was driving up and down the streets and I saw you guys' sirens and saw the car in the middle of the street and literally pulled up and drove it." As the officer checks her name—"144 last is King Ida Boy Lincoln Edward Robert first of or first is spelled Sam Henry Adam Nora Tom Young Lincoln Lincoln Edward Middle initial L Lincoln"—she preemptively challenges her own credibility: "If you even wanna believe me." The officer responds professionally: "Okay, I'm just trying to." The conversation returns to the central contradiction: "I get it's your car but obviously we were just chasing this car." She acknowledges this reality: "And I know that and I just moved it up the middle of the street." This admission, documented on bodycam, reveals her awareness of the vehicle's involvement in the pursuit despite her earlier denial of knowing the suspect. When checking her driving status—"Are you valid to drive and everything?"—she displays confidence: "Yeah. You could check me. Okay. Run me whatever you want." The questioning returns to the suspect's whereabouts: "You don't know where he went?" She remains firm in her denial: "I swear to god I really don't. I literally pulled up and saw the car. Sorry I'm cold. Saw the car in the middle of the road and saw that there's nobody in it." She emphasizes her limited knowledge: "I didn't see him jump out. The car was literally already there parked." The investigation continues with location questions, but is interrupted when another officer inquires: "Do you guys need anything from her? She's the owner of the car. She's saying she just seen the car here so she got out and drove it here but—" A phone conversation becomes evident, and the officer directs: "Can you hang the phone up please?" She complies: "Sure." According to police reports, this February 3, 2023 incident involved 43-year-old Drae Shaun Broadnax fleeing from police during a high-risk traffic stop arranged after an inmate informant provided information about methamphetamine trafficking. When officers searched the abandoned vehicle, they discovered 56.4 grams of methamphetamine, 7.5 grams of cocaine, 5.3 grams of marijuana, and seized $1,896 in cash from the woman, who was described as a potential co-defendant in court documents. This police bodycam footage highlights the complex web of contradictions officers must navigate when questioning individuals with apparent connections to drug trafficking operations, demonstrating how claims of coincidental presence often unravel through persistent questioning. Subscribe for more police bodycam footage showing real-life law enforcement situations. New videos uploaded weekly! #policebodycam #drugtrafficking #lacrossecounty

Tags
police bodycam vehicle ownership drug trafficking La Crosse County contradictory statements +7 more
police bodycam vehicle ownership drug trafficking La Crosse County contradictory statements Drae Shaun Broadnax methamphetamine investigation suspect flight eyewitness questioning abandoned vehicle accomplice questioning daytime pursuit
Transcripts
Add
en Auto
2025-06-29
Resources
Add
No resources available
Characters
Add
No characters available
Notes
Add
No notes available
Event Details
Edit
No event details available
Stats History
Date Views Likes
2025-06-28 766 21
Danger Zone

These actions cannot be undone.